Having seen many specialist/doctors I generally think they suck at diagnosing, unless its something you could literally discover yourself by a google search and access to a specific test. I don't think they are bad doctors, I just learned that sometimes diagnosis can be rather difficult.<p>Then, you have a computer, it can reference recent studies compare symptoms with hundreds of diseases and generate a test plan accordingly based on probability of a disease or urgency. Frankly, I am surprised not more work is being done with algorithms in medicine.<p>Humans are biased, egoistic and most don't like being told they are wrong.
Aren't these algorithms trained on expert-annotated data? If so how does it end up performing better than radiologists? Or are these radiologists only mediocre at detecting cancer?