TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Warning Signs That a Bubble Is About to Burst

90 pointsby samrohnalmost 6 years ago

23 comments

Moodlesalmost 6 years ago
I was expecting to see discussions of something like a yield curve in this article, not the fashion sense of CEOs...<p>Market timing is pretty much impossible for most people. So many people said we’re heading for a crash 3, 4, 5 years ago. They lost out on so many gains. We might crash tomorrow, or we might crash in 5 years. Nobody knows for sure. Market timing based on articles like this is a fool’s game.<p>I’d really love these people who constantly predict the crash to also predict when the market will pick up, but of course they never do. They just keep predicting a crash and eventually get lucky. And we only remember the correct predictions. Why don’t they put their money where their mouth is and actually show us all that they’re investing according to their predictions as well...
评论 #20049108 未加载
评论 #20049243 未加载
评论 #20049918 未加载
评论 #20049320 未加载
评论 #20049922 未加载
评论 #20050010 未加载
nostrademonsalmost 6 years ago
TBH I don&#x27;t see much of a bubble by these metrics. My indicators for &quot;not in a bubble&quot; are:<p>1. New grads are more interested in getting a job at a big company than in getting a job at a hot startup.<p>2. Fundraising requires revenue.<p>3. There is a constant negative press cycle around the industry.<p>4. People are moving out of Silicon Valley.<p>5. CEOs from the last bubble are getting indicted.<p>All of these are present today. Meanwhile, out of the article&#x27;s list, the only bubble indicator I see is that Apple, Facebook, Google, and Amazon have all built shiny new headquarters. Tech P&#x2F;Es are incredibly <i>low</i> compared to the general market (Apple is at 14 vs. the market&#x27;s 25 or so), and the market P&#x2F;E is not out of line with interest rates (P&#x2F;E of 25 implies a real rate of return of about 4%, vs. about 2% for Treasuries. Mark Zuckerburg and Larry Page are too busy raising kids to either attend to their companies or be celebrities, Tim Cook is busy running his company, and Jeff Bezos is busy getting divorced. Haven&#x27;t noticed any particular CEO fashion. People are looking to grey-haired figures for leadership, not young people. Six-figure tech salaries are just inflation: there&#x27;s money (<i>real</i> money, not bubble-money) in tech, and intense competition for employees, and so that filters down to wages.<p>If anything, the real tech bubble burst in 2015 with the unraveling of Theranos, Zenefits, and Uber, and we&#x27;ve been in tech recession since. 2015 also seemed to be peak Silicon Valley rent increases, and the last time you could raise capital on just an idea. There was a mini-bubble in crypto in 2017, but that also popped, and the dominant zeitgeist today is complaints about how shitty life is, how there&#x27;s no growth anywhere, and how we&#x27;re on the precipice of a revolution, civil war, environmental catastrophe, dictatorship, or all 4.
评论 #20049213 未加载
评论 #20050110 未加载
评论 #20051574 未加载
评论 #20049784 未加载
shucklesalmost 6 years ago
I&#x27;m aware of three indicators of bubbles:<p>1. Pricing anomalies where the price of two assets that have fundamental relation to each other violate that relation. For example, in the 1999 bubble, 3Com was a majority owner of Palm, but their market caps were inverted for almost two months.<p>2. Huge upward movements in price without any corresponding changes in fundamentals. NASDAQ doubled in 2000 without commensurate good news in the prospect of telecom and internet companies. Similar was Bitcoin&#x27;s tenfolding, or whatever, in 2018.<p>3. Huge downward movements in price without fundamental news. Again, NASDAQ decreased by 3&#x2F;4 of its value in a year and a half even though there was only a short recession, rates were low, and economic fundamentals like productivity were growing fast. Part of the reason I listed downwards movements as separate from upwards is that volatility in valuation is an important feature in and of itself.<p>I&#x27;m curious if anyone has indicators to add to the list or is able to apply these indicators to current events.<p>And as always, even if you have identified a bubble, trading profitably on this is subject to the efficient market hypothesis.
评论 #20049173 未加载
评论 #20049236 未加载
slimscsialmost 6 years ago
“Mediocrity + two years of tech experience = six figures. Kids who can code and are two years out of school, who are mediocre, are making $100,000-plus in the market. What’s worse is that they believe they’re worth it. If you can code, yay for you. But you have no real hard skills or management ability.“<p>So, when this bubble breaks, companies will lay off the coders and have a bunch of managers managing each other into profitability? Makes perfect sense.<p>Implying Management is a “hard skill” and coding isn’t Is disingenuous at best.
评论 #20054733 未加载
ng12almost 6 years ago
&gt; Mediocrity + two years of tech experience = six figures. Kids who can code and are two years out of school, who are mediocre, are making $100,000-plus in the market<p>This has been true for almost a decade at this point.
评论 #20049139 未加载
评论 #20051259 未加载
评论 #20049606 未加载
评论 #20049413 未加载
评论 #20049395 未加载
评论 #20049302 未加载
friedman23almost 6 years ago
A website idea that I&#x27;ve had for a while now but haven&#x27;t gotten around to implementing is a website to track predictions by people and whether they ever come to pass. Fear mongering is very profitable and it is very damaging to society. We should track every doom sayer&#x27;s prediction so that when they inevitably make another we can see their track record.<p>&gt;Mediocrity + two years of tech experience = six figures. Kids who can code and are two years out of school, who are mediocre, are making $100,000-plus in the market. What’s worse is that they believe they’re worth it. If you can code, yay for you. But you have no real hard skills or management ability. Not recognizing that you’re overpaid means you won’t have the funds to avoid your parents’ basement when shit gets real.<p>Frankly, this person doesn&#x27;t seem to know what he is talking about. The most profitable companies in the world are software businesses. Why? Because software is a nearly infinite margin product. The marginal cost of software is so inexpensive that the most profitable companies in the world give it away for free.<p>Given that selling software is so profitable and is a skilled trade (limiting the supply of developers) it is logical that the compensation of software engineers is so high and it will remain high as long as logic and a technical understanding of computers is required to develop software. Software&#x27;s penetration into the economy is only just starting.
karmakazealmost 6 years ago
All this post says is how things were the last time a tech bubble burst. It doesn&#x27;t give any reasons why the timing should be the same for the next one.<p>When people say we&#x27;re in a bubble, what they&#x27;re implying is that the bubble is about to burst. Yes we&#x27;re in a tech bubble, this is how life is now and I don&#x27;t see it changing. If&#x2F;when it bursts, we&#x27;ll start growing into another one. No clear reason is given why the bubble we&#x27;re in now can&#x27;t keep growing for a while longer. If anything the trade war is deflating the bubble. At some point there will be an event or signal when the bubble pops if not sufficiently deflated. The post doesn&#x27;t mention anything to this effect in my reading.<p>I think it&#x27;s more interesting to consider the magnitude of the investors&#x27; and CEOs&#x27; filter bubble. Maybe that&#x27;s what the article is trying to get at, and that makes some sense. That bubble is larger and more self-sustaining than any earlier time. I think it&#x27;s going to take a steady series of failed unicorns to get that signal in.
baohaalmost 6 years ago
I&#x27;m not sure how a professor at a pretty good school like NYU has a blunt tone like this.<p>Beside personally criticizing people by their personal choice, which I found baseless, there is zero information here. There are people with that life style like that all the time, just because they happen to be tech CEO doesn&#x27;t mean it&#x27;s a sign to a macro thing like bubble.<p>One thing I&#x27;ve been regreting the most after 10 year living in the valley is that I shouldn&#x27;t have listened to the &#x27;tech bubble&#x27; propaganda back in 2016, nor delayed buying my first house, which should have saved me ton of cash.
bellBivDineshalmost 6 years ago
Coders aren&#x27;t safe because they don&#x27;t have hard skills like <i>management ability</i>.
评论 #20049434 未加载
Bombthecatalmost 6 years ago
The bubble is always almost bursting... And the next recession is always just around the corner...<p>If you predict often enough, one day you will be right...
shooalmost 6 years ago
Some other leading indicators of &quot;formal&quot; recessions [%]:<p>* as others mention, yield curve inversion. e.g: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;financial-charts.effingapp.com&#x2F;yield-curve" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;financial-charts.effingapp.com&#x2F;yield-curve</a><p>* unemployment rate climbing after hitting a local minima. e.g. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;financial-charts.effingapp.com&#x2F;usa-unemployment" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;financial-charts.effingapp.com&#x2F;usa-unemployment</a><p>Some other indicators that expected long-term stock market returns may be low:<p>* valuation ratios -- in terms of P&#x2F;B, P&#x2F;E, CA(P&#x2F;E), etc, are high [+], compared to historical norms. e.g. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.starcapital.de&#x2F;en&#x2F;research&#x2F;stock-market-expectations&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.starcapital.de&#x2F;en&#x2F;research&#x2F;stock-market-expectat...</a><p>* supply &amp; demand factors, in terms of how much the average investor has allocated to the stock market [@]. e.g. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;financial-charts.effingapp.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;financial-charts.effingapp.com&#x2F;</a><p>[%] periods when recessions occur tend to be formally defined after the fact, by economists looking backwards at historical data. this may not be particularly helpful for anyone trying to time the market before a crash. &quot;Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.&quot; -- Bohr.<p>[+] some people may push back on this, saying &quot;stocks are priced high relative to what alternatives?&quot; -- if all alternative asset classes are also &quot;overpriced&quot;, then maybe that just means there&#x27;s far too much cash floating about, and not many good investment opportunities remaining. but if all asset prices are &quot;overpriced&quot;, then nothing is, cash is just devalued...<p>[@] n.b. the blog post that this indicator is based on is intended as somewhat of a joke, as an example of how it is possible to construct rather arbitrary and misleading indicators that look good --- but it&#x27;s an interesting read: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.philosophicaleconomics.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;12&#x2F;the-single-greatest-predictor-of-future-stock-market-returns&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.philosophicaleconomics.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;12&#x2F;the-single-gre...</a>
评论 #20050104 未加载
评论 #20049287 未加载
评论 #20053421 未加载
acchowalmost 6 years ago
I like the behavioral signs pointed out in this article - of both people and organizations. The signs of a bubble are becoming much more pronounced than 3 or 4 years ago. Add to that the temporary yield curve inversion a few months ago, and again this week. Along with negative 10-year yields in Germany today...<p>I took a large hedge against a recession in my portfolio today because I think this one can be severe given the amount of QE.
chvidalmost 6 years ago
This sort of prediction: &quot;Things are going really well therefore they must be about to turn really bad.&quot; Has a certain emotional appeal but they are not a reliable indication of when a recession is about to occur.
bencollier49almost 6 years ago
The long hangover from 2008 has put the cycle out of whack, but I always remember a quote from - I thought it was someone like Soros - saying that the number cranes on the skyline was an indicator of an impending crash. Apparently there is something called the Skyscraper Index which makes largely the same point.<p>There are a lot of cranes in Manchester and London at the moment.
评论 #20049204 未加载
bubblewrapalmost 6 years ago
seem to remember reading that by now, internet companies have created more value than was destroyed in the dot com crash.<p>Maybe people are just speculating wildly because they stakes are high - maybe that&#x27;s not even wrong behavior?<p>Also interested in the &quot;giant penises&quot; description of high building. Isn&#x27;t it simply space efficient to build high rather than flat? At least if space is restricted, like on Manhattan Island, it makes sense. Maybe not so much if you are located in a desert with unlimited space in all directions.<p>Also, there is a signalling aspect to marketing. Being able to afford expensive marketing (including huge building, expensive ads) proves that you have at least some kind of success so that you were able to come up with the money.
j7akealmost 6 years ago
Talk is cheap. How much is he putting his own money on the line to support this bearish position?
justaaronalmost 6 years ago
Can we please have a moratorium on Medium articles? They are now a paywalled site and even content providers are invited to pay to view their bloated blog pages. The site itself offers nothing in addition to the content we freely provided them.
lapinotalmost 6 years ago
&gt; Warning Signs That a Bubble Is About to Burst<p>Multiplication of people writing frantic click bait articles about how bad the current state is.
davesquealmost 6 years ago
So there&#x27;s a bubble because some f<i></i>*boy didn&#x27;t get to buy himself a jet? Bad way to start an article.
roymurdockalmost 6 years ago
Author isn&#x27;t saying anything new or insightful<p>Until he can say when and how the debt collection chain will break down and spiral out of control, what types of non performing loans will spark a recession, and how he&#x27;s going to hedge and make money off that recession, not interested<p>Just product placement for his new book
userulluipestealmost 6 years ago
<i>&quot;too inexperienced to be running companies that hundreds or thousands of families depend on for their livelihood&quot;</i><p>Did the author just implied that one would start or&#x2F;and run a company out of some moral responsibility for others&#x27; families livelihood?
shooalmost 6 years ago
sing along: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=I6IQ_FOCE6I" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=I6IQ_FOCE6I</a>
irjustinalmost 6 years ago
This is probably the weakest &quot;why you should listen to me for timing the market&quot; post that I&#x27;ve seen in a while.<p>Markets crash based on fundamentals. The specific examples - Meyer, Holmes - are not indicative of market crashes let a lone direct signals or full on causes of them even when a few are grouped together.<p>Remember the time when people said Trump would kill the market? Dow 22k? I&#x27;m not saying it won&#x27;t eventually happen with the next correction, but if I listened to those guys then, I would&#x27;ve missed ~10%. We don &#x27;t know if that correction will be 5, 10, 50%.<p>Dave Ramsey - Don&#x27;t time the market. Buy Indicies.