TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Amazon’s Ring Is Putting Suspected Petty Thieves in Its Advertisements

112 pointsby nwrkalmost 6 years ago

15 comments

bdcravensalmost 6 years ago
On the Ring Neighbors app, you see all sorts of videos where the posters are making criminal accusations all the time. (usually it's a guy selling electricity door to door, but his skin tone is wrong, so they assume he's there to rob the house)
评论 #20128449 未加载
评论 #20128056 未加载
评论 #20125595 未加载
评论 #20129890 未加载
评论 #20126162 未加载
评论 #20125622 未加载
awinderalmost 6 years ago
<p><pre><code> In the video, the woman’s face is clearly visible and there is no obvious criminal activity taking place. The Facebook post shows her passing between two cars. She pulls the door handle of one of the cars, but it is locked. </code></pre> Yeah that&#x27;s pretty clearly attempting to steal vehicles &#x2F; contents of vehicles, that&#x27;s 100% what that looks like.
评论 #20127713 未加载
评论 #20128124 未加载
评论 #20129174 未加载
评论 #20127586 未加载
评论 #20127985 未加载
评论 #20127861 未加载
codezeroalmost 6 years ago
Can we talk about the fact that in the US you are granted no right to privacy in public spaces? I don’t think this is universally good. Companies have used this fact to build databases of license plate locations and much more. Our anger shouldn’t primarily be directed at Amazon, but rather at the acceptance of public surveillance.<p>Hopefully, events like this help bring more light to this kind of blanket acceptance.
rolltiidealmost 6 years ago
from linked tweet:<p>&gt; is it legal for ring&#x2F;amazon to use faces of people, suspected BY THEIR CUSTOMERS to have done crimes, in an advertisement? especially given they haven&#x27;t consented or been convicted or anything. seems uhhh not right<p>This really comes down to the consequences.<p>&quot;A calculated risk betting that the people shown allegedly committing crimes won&#x27;t risk identifying themselves to sue&quot;<p>or a paid actor.<p>generally a win for everyone
trhwayalmost 6 years ago
&gt;Amazon purchased Ring in 2018. The company sells surveillance camera systems, and recently filed two patent applications for facial recognition technology in its cameras that would automatically alert law enforcement to &quot;suspicious&quot; people.<p>next version will feature a drone quietly deployed to follow the &quot;suspicious&quot; person and to tazer the person upon the &quot;suspiciousness&quot; crossing the pre-determined threshold (established by the neighborhood).
schaeferalmost 6 years ago
What&#x27;s Amazon Ring selling? Fear? No thanks, I&#x27;ll pass.
评论 #20130396 未加载
man2525almost 6 years ago
The app itself is entertaining, but a lot of false alarms. My favorite so far was a county worker who tripped my camera with his...i want to say water collection tool...from off camera before hanging a doorknob sign warning of mosquitoes. I took a screen capture while at work and zoomed in on his shirt to see the familiar county symbol.<p>Most of the crimes are petty...the older generation doesn&#x27;t always lock their cars..., although one guy shot up a barbershop a mile or two away, killing several barbers. Good to know. Also, I know why that police chopper is circling or what caused that fire in the distance. My neighbors are pretty good at being on the DL, but this is a lot faster. Not as good as a scanner, but my local PD refuses to be on the internet scanner apps anyway.<p>Not to say that even the police reports get it right. Shoplifting and armed robbery aren&#x27;t the same.
ltc5505almost 6 years ago
Aren&#x27;t we at the stage where we can generate faces? Like the This Person Does Not Exist website?
kyleblarsonalmost 6 years ago
If only there were a way for her to not be put in this situation in the first place.
评论 #20129488 未加载
lacraig2almost 6 years ago
I honestly can&#x27;t see a problem with this so long as police posted a BOLO before ring.
mimixcoalmost 6 years ago
I smell a lawsuit coming. How can Amazon think it&#x27;s ok to use people&#x27;s faces in an advertisement when those people haven&#x27;t been convicted of a crime?<p>The case of Ring is particularly disturbing. When its inventor appeared on Shark Tank, he said he wanted to create a way to hear his doorbell from the garage. Since Amazon bought the company for $1B, it&#x27;s pivoted to a surveillance tool that&#x27;s being offered to police as a way to freely record and review neighborhood camera views.<p>It&#x27;s sad to see that unicorn companies today believe that surveillance capitalism is the way forward. Personally, I long for a return to old-fashioned values in business, namely making a product or service that people care about and want to pay for rather than pandering to fear and courting easy money from our soon-to-be robot overlords.
评论 #20125583 未加载
评论 #20130448 未加载
评论 #20125495 未加载
评论 #20125556 未加载
评论 #20125520 未加载
评论 #20127925 未加载
评论 #20127843 未加载
lern_too_spelalmost 6 years ago
I don&#x27;t see a problem. The police department posted the same video.
评论 #20125392 未加载
评论 #20125397 未加载
评论 #20128991 未加载
givinguflacalmost 6 years ago
Innocent until proven guilty.*<p>*or until public ads by Amazon sway the jury with video editing and accusations.
jmsflknralmost 6 years ago
Posted this yesterday with same source, same headline: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=20117905" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=20117905</a>
评论 #20125589 未加载
评论 #20125508 未加载
评论 #20125760 未加载
hn23almost 6 years ago
Somehow this reminds me of the &quot;Running Man&quot; movie. There was a comercial playing that said something like: &quot;Citizen, denounce your neighbor, and get some extra dollars&quot;...<p>There should have been more positive visions of the future. These idiot companies took the shit from the 80s as script it seems.