TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Dead Simple VPN

148 pointsby stargravealmost 6 years ago

12 comments

TazeTSchnitzelalmost 6 years ago
If you already have OpenSSH installed, it has a built-in tunnel you can activate with a single command-line argument that exposes a SOCKS server on localhost.
评论 #20491836 未加载
评论 #20491756 未加载
majkealmost 6 years ago
I'm very impressed with the blog. At least one post a month for ten years? Whoa. Impressive.
regecksalmost 6 years ago
jedisct1 sure is prolific with all these lean and friendly crypto-related applications.<p>dnscrypt-proxy, libsodium, libhydrogen, minisign, dsvpn, probably others I&#x27;ve never heard of.
评论 #20491049 未加载
评论 #20490504 未加载
hoschiczalmost 6 years ago
This is exactly what I have been looking for. One executable, symmetric keys and any port I want.<p>TCP is sometimes a must (library Wi-Fi that supports only known ports). But UDP is (i think?) better for wrapping TCP traffic.
评论 #20491300 未加载
ahnickalmost 6 years ago
Does this provide some benefit over a Wireguard setup? (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wireguard.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wireguard.com&#x2F;</a>)
评论 #20490278 未加载
kbodyalmost 6 years ago
Even simpler for some use cases:<p>`ssh -D 1080 -C -q -N root@your-vps`
评论 #20491372 未加载
antoinealbalmost 6 years ago
So correct me if I am wrong but this is doing IP in TCP right ? Iirc, this is a big issue for tcp flow control, which relies on packet loss to detect congestion: as you encapsulate stuff in tcp stream, there will be no more packet loss and the tunelled tcp will not throttle correctly.<p>Did not read the code yet, so maybe there is something to simulate congestion packet loss.
评论 #20490550 未加载
评论 #20490565 未加载
galapagoalmost 6 years ago
Does this provide some benefit over Algo? (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;trailofbits&#x2F;algo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;trailofbits&#x2F;algo</a>)
评论 #20491555 未加载
grenoirealmost 6 years ago
Pretty damn cool, but I can&#x27;t see this giving you much in way of anonymity. Yet, should be all fine for getting through to region-locked DRM content.
评论 #20490105 未加载
评论 #20491056 未加载
acqqalmost 6 years ago
What are the implications of:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;eprint.iacr.org&#x2F;2019&#x2F;447" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;eprint.iacr.org&#x2F;2019&#x2F;447</a><p>&quot;Practical Key-recovery Attacks on Round-Reduced Ketje Jr, Xoodoo-AE and Xoodyak&quot;?<p>As far as I understand round-reduced doesn&#x27;t have to mean all rounds are broken, but it is still something to think about.
评论 #20494174 未加载
armitronalmost 6 years ago
DSVPN does not seem to support PFS [1] which would immediately disqualify for any purpose for me.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Forward_secrecy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Forward_secrecy</a>
评论 #20493585 未加载
评论 #20492837 未加载
tmd83almost 6 years ago
I don&#x27;t really understand network much. &gt; dsvpn server &#x2F;root&#x2F;vpn.key auto 443 auto 10.8.0.254 10.8.0.2<p>So what does those last two ip means? Similarly for the client.
评论 #20494252 未加载