TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Arrow of time and its reversal on the IBM quantum computer

64 pointsby espeedalmost 6 years ago

5 comments

panicalmost 6 years ago
Previous discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=19378567" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=19378567</a>
stallmanitealmost 6 years ago
Always fun waiting for Scott Aaronson to explain why the latest QC paper is bullshit. Until then can any Quantum Information experts here provide some background? I read the paper but don’t trust my intuition with these kind of things.
评论 #20489670 未加载
评论 #20489639 未加载
inflatableDodoalmost 6 years ago
&gt;<i>The exemplary outcome probabilities 𝑃𝑖𝑗=|⟨𝑏𝑖𝑏𝑗|𝜓̃ 0⟩|2 and 𝑃𝑖𝑗𝑘=|⟨𝑏𝑖𝑏𝑗𝑏𝑘|𝜓̃ 0⟩|2, 𝑖,𝑗,𝑘=0,1 obtained in a real experiment for the 2- and 3-qubit models are shown on the Fig. 3E. One can see that the probability for observing the correct final state |0…0⟩ is less than 100% and for 2- and 3-qubit experiment are given by 85.3±0.4% and 49.1±0.6% correspondingly.</i><p>Does this mean that the 3 qubit model is predicted to only get the correct result for less than half the times it is asked?
devxpyalmost 6 years ago
Relevant data structures lecture :<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=T0yzrZL1py0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=T0yzrZL1py0</a>
meow_mixalmost 6 years ago
Can anyone break this down into something non-clickbaity?
评论 #20491309 未加载
评论 #20490122 未加载