TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Contrapuntal Consciousness

3 pointsby mxcrossbalmost 6 years ago

1 comment

ksajalmost 6 years ago
Dumping on Hofstadter this way feels almost sacrilegious. Sometimes the writer sounds like they get what GEB is about, then follow up with statements that show they clearly do not.<p>I hope the writer doesn&#x27;t read Metamagical Themas (admittedly, a book I like more, but it reaches even further to the fringes). It&#x27;ll clearly go over their head in spectacular fashion, and would certainly fuel more of this kind of half-informed op ed.<p>Even worse, the writer dishes on terms like Molecular Canon. That&#x27;s not Hofstadter&#x27;s invention, and it is very not as stupid as the writer makes it out to be. Those who study Origins of Life are quite familiar with the concept.<p>Read any of good biology text, and you&#x27;ll become more than comfortable with the term and what it specifically means. Unsurprisingly you&#x27;ll discover it is exactly &quot;how ribosomes translate messenger RNA into proteins&quot; as Hofstadter describes.<p>A molecular canon (ribosome) literally splits DNA into codons (kinda like half-DNA in 3-nucleotide sets), which get transcribed into mRNA, shoots it through a ring of protein (the canon), where it fuses the resulting tRNA with material available at the exit. Now attach the result to an amino acid, fold, and voila, protein synthesis, and most importantly for this analogy - a solid copy of the original material. Reproduction 101.<p>Taken in the Hofstadter sense comparing that to Bach, themes are ripped apart, work their way through the cannon, mix with other themes until they eventually replicate a copy of the original theme. How isn&#x27;t that concept similar?<p>Even the idea that the canon ends an octave higher shows their ignorance, since a canon is played by multiple instruments, and those octaves do indeed resolve together. So the writer fails on both sides of their arguments.<p>I hate how this article is written in such a way it almost sounds like the writer knows what they are talking about, when they are snidely riffing it throughout. The writer repeatedly demonstrates they do not understand the subjects covered in GEB.