TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Roman Numerals

20 pointsby johndcookover 14 years ago

4 comments

jwsover 14 years ago
IIII persists on clocks. 7 of the 8 roman numeral clock faces I found in the house just now use IIII.<p>Unicode does not sanction it. There are unicode codes for digits 1 through 12, plus L, C, D, and M, but all my "ROMAN NUMERAL FOUR" (0x2163) are rendered as IV.
评论 #2059966 未加载
petercooperover 14 years ago
1999 would be MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII under the subtraction-less method. Ouch. Though it still ends up as MCMXCIX doing it the "proper" way despite IM being a cute workaround ;-)
wallflowerover 14 years ago
Related - I've searched for an authoritative voice on why the letter 'V' was used in place of 'U'. Does anyone know? I do like the story about U with its round curves being too hard to chisel, and I've not found anything besides opinion and speculation out there.
评论 #2059700 未加载
评论 #2059449 未加载
评论 #2059498 未加载
2bitover 14 years ago
You can still find IIII on many grandfather clocks: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IIII#IIII_and_IV" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IIII#IIII_and_IV</a>