This article states claims that it doesn't back up with any evidence. For example:<p>"The biggest reason for this consumer adoption is the robust developer adoption Android has engendered."<p>Really? So says an Android developer. Imagine that.<p>What about the fact that there are many different Android powered smartphones, available through many different carriers, available in a wide variety of hardware configurations (with/without keyboard, etc).<p>I don't have any proof to show that this is the driving factor behind Android's growth, but it sounds just as plausible to me. The problem comes when you state it as fact without any supporting evidence.