TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

ZFS for Mac OS X Breaths New Life

70 pointsby nilioover 14 years ago
I'm not sure how many folks have been mourning the seeming loss of ZFS for Mac OS X for as long as I have... but I thought that this was not only great news, but a tremendous opportunity for folks to really pitch in and help a very worthwhile project for those who value their data!<p>Very exciting!

9 comments

ComputerGuruover 14 years ago
What I'm actually more interested in is what Apple is intending on using instead of ZFS.<p>All indications are that ZFS will <i>not</i> be the next filesystem for OS X, yet they'll need to replace HFS soon seeing as it's the worst-performing and fewest-featured filesystem in use with this generation of operating systems. HFS+ is showing its age in multiple places, and Apple could really take advantage of some of the newer features available in modern filesystems to make a huge difference and increase the power and performance behind some of the current features (a la Time Machine), with techniques such as snapshots, transactioned reads/writes, and more.
评论 #2087893 未加载
评论 #2087739 未加载
js2over 14 years ago
"Breaths new life" is a bit misleading' no? From the project page: "this code project will be used to record issues and ongoing development (if any) of this extension"<p>As well, only a single commit to the git repo since July. :(
评论 #2087696 未加载
评论 #2087779 未加载
评论 #2087440 未加载
melvinramover 14 years ago
For those (like me) who are clueless on what ZFS is, the wiki page has a good overview:<p><pre><code> In computing, ZFS is a combined file system and logical volume manager designed by Sun Microsystems. The features of ZFS include data integrity (protection against bit rot, etc), support for high storage capacities, integration of the concepts of filesystem and volume management, snapshots and copy-on-write clones, continuous integrity checking and automatic repair, RAID-Z and native NFSv4 ACLs. </code></pre> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS</a>
评论 #2087393 未加载
redialover 14 years ago
Does anyone know if Oracle is still developing ZFS, or just Btrfs? Has the situation changed so that Apple may include it on next iterations of OS X, or are we stuck with HSF+ forever?
评论 #2087570 未加载
评论 #2087733 未加载
nilioover 14 years ago
ZFS runs amazingly well on FreeBSD at the moment. Very, very stable and incredible. I love having to not worry about bad blocks / sectors anymore! I also love raid-z2 which allows 2 failed drives simultaneously. Just an amazing comfort. We can see this on Mac OS X with some effort!
joubertover 14 years ago
ZFS is fantastic; it was my file system when I ran Solarid on my Sun workstation (until I replaced it with Ubuntu).<p>I did get bitten once, wiping out a whole bunch of data very unexpectedly, which I thought was a great ZFS weakness - <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org/msg09919.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org/msg0...</a>
BonoboBonerover 14 years ago
What I am interested in is, are there any ZFS patents that Oracle could use to sue Apple once they eventually broadly ship ZFS?
评论 #2087878 未加载
评论 #2088675 未加载
zdwover 14 years ago
Does this support newer zfs and zpool versions? (newer version = more features)<p>Here's a list of where other platforms are at: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS#Comparisons" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS#Comparisons</a>
jmcnevinover 14 years ago
I'll be that guy.<p>breath = noun breathe = verb<p>"Breathes" New Life<p>That is all. :)