TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Who vomited on Mashable's layout?

10 pointsby curiousepicover 14 years ago

8 comments

empire29over 14 years ago
Looking at the design my eyes wander, rather than being directed -- element are too stylistically similar. It doesn't help that the images are roughly the same size which prevents them from denoting relative importance. The constant use of blue is overwhelming as well.<p>I never thought i'd say this, but the new mashable makes TC's design look inspired. At least on TC its very easy to ignore the right column.
terryjsmithover 14 years ago
The single post page looks much better/more thought out than the front page. The front page lacks flow; there's no differentiation between the sidebar and the content and I'm not quite sure where to look first, next, etc.
wglbover 14 years ago
Kind of puts the "mash" into Mashable, don't you think?
bviover 14 years ago
Mashable has <i>always</i> had a pretty horribly layout. That's the main reason I never visit that site.
mnml_over 14 years ago
It was much better before
timepilotover 14 years ago
Front Page is horrible!
abrudtkuhlover 14 years ago
that's what happens when you design for advertising
rhizomeover 14 years ago
The front page design makes me think that they're going for <i>some</i> whitespace, but that you really can't click on the page without clicking on something. A blurring between ads and content that makes it more likely to accidentally click an ad, and that every click on a page should result in a pageload of some sort, even if the user was intending to click a blank area.<p>It's like 'horror vacui'[1] applied to web development.<p>[1]: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horror_vacui" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horror_vacui</a>