TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Stack Overflow Inc. Fiasco: Timeline

516 pointsby SnarkAshover 5 years ago

56 comments

goostavosover 5 years ago
&quot;require use of preferred pronouns and avoiding them is forbidden&quot;<p>This line of thinking is so bizarre to me, but seems to be increasingly common (or at least loud enough in the right places to be noticed). There is a segment of the population that seems intent on being able assign and punish that assumed thought crime.<p>Now your lack of a specific behavior is suspect!
评论 #21175703 未加载
评论 #21175815 未加载
评论 #21174020 未加载
评论 #21173900 未加载
评论 #21186677 未加载
评论 #21173931 未加载
评论 #21175740 未加载
评论 #21183183 未加载
评论 #21173865 未加载
评论 #21173998 未加载
评论 #21173893 未加载
评论 #21174053 未加载
评论 #21174106 未加载
miopaover 5 years ago
This is getting quite ridiculous.<p>I don&#x27;t want to know your gender. I don&#x27;t care. It&#x27;s your thing. It&#x27;s non of my business, and it makes no difference to me whatsoever.<p>If I do want to know your gender, then things between us are starting to become intimate.<p>To sum things up: I would say it&#x27;s rude if someone shares his gender identity with me without being asked. On the same level as if someone shares his&#x2F;her dick size without being asked.
评论 #21174904 未加载
评论 #21174985 未加载
评论 #21248459 未加载
conradfrover 5 years ago
I&#x27;m appalled that moderators edit posts over pronouns. And not sure why the gender or sexual orientation of people matters on a site where you can basically be anonymous. I guess because I only read Stack Overflow questions from Google searches there&#x27;s a whole dimension of Stack Exchange that eludes me.<p>On Twitter I know not to engage with people that specify their pronouns on their bio, it&#x27;s just a waste of time even for trolling. I guess it&#x27;s something that I can extend to SE and elsewhere.<p>And to be clear I&#x27;ve no problem with trans people and calling them what they want, but sometimes it&#x27;s just difficult to remind it all (and confusing over different languages).<p>About CoCs: who would have thought? Well ...
评论 #21174080 未加载
marcinzmover 5 years ago
&gt;The employee did not stay to field questions, but came back a couple hours later to tell me &quot;we&#x27;ve been as clear as we can and your values are out of alignment&quot;.<p>The core issue as I see it isn&#x27;t CoC or gender pronouns. Stack Overflow is punishing people if their perceived internal views (ie: &quot;values&quot;) are not the same as a set of unwritten allowed views. So basically thought crime mixed with McCarthyism. Except without any specific clarify on what the allowed thoughts are.
评论 #21174142 未加载
评论 #21174032 未加载
评论 #21174303 未加载
anoncareer0212over 5 years ago
I&#x27;m mildly embarrassed to have written off critiques of the Great Awokening via CoCs a few years ago – after a few more years dealing with adult life, it&#x27;s pretty clear that two constants are A) people, universally, can be in a dark cloud where unrelated actions by unrelated people are a personal attack on their existence B) authority _hates_ dealing with issues, especially the more distant they are from you in the hierarchy, and will always choose the option that keeps the largest crowd aware of the situation the quietest.
wendyshuover 5 years ago
Stack Overflow hired a highly political, sanctimonious Community Manager and this is the result.<p>E.g. he suggested users who didn&#x27;t like the rules require therapy <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meta.stackoverflow.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;389935&#x2F;why-was-the-meta-room-frozen" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meta.stackoverflow.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;389935&#x2F;why-was-the-...</a> <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.li&#x2F;UGUNK" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.li&#x2F;UGUNK</a>
评论 #21174450 未加载
评论 #21174533 未加载
Wowfunhappyover 5 years ago
I was ready to be on Monica&#x27;s side until I found and read the leaked Teacher&#x27;s Lounge transcript. I&#x27;m now significantly more conflicted.<p>In the chat, Monica was asked many times, by <i>many</i> other moderators, to <i>please</i> use &quot;singular they&quot; for people who she actively knew preferred that pronoun. Monica flat out refused, saying it was confusing and grammatically incorrect. She said she&#x27;d be happy to use literally any other word, including &quot;new&quot; pronouns like &quot;Xe&quot;. She also suggested that she could avoid using pronouns altogether, either just for people who preferred singular they, or universally for everyone. (Other moderators said this last option likely <i>would have</i> been fine had Monica not made known her reason for doing so.)<p>Now, on a purely personal level, I <i>also</i> find singular they to be super confusing in conversation, at least when the subject is unambiguous. But the extent to which Monica refused to budge, <i>even after being told that she was making colleagues uncomfortable</i>, struck me as behavior that would need to be disciplined in any formal workplace.
评论 #21175343 未加载
评论 #21175163 未加载
评论 #21175602 未加载
dmixover 5 years ago
One of the many reasons I&#x27;d never work at a big company.<p>I just want to build software. I don&#x27;t go to work to talk politics or have to keep track of every person&#x27;s political radicalism for fear of being fired.<p>I&#x27;d also prefer not to add even more social anxiety because I don&#x27;t keep up with the latest stuff on Twitter.
评论 #21174326 未加载
评论 #21174685 未加载
评论 #21175843 未加载
narratorover 5 years ago
I&#x27;d like to learn how to force cultural change on people who don&#x27;t want it and don&#x27;t care about it. It&#x27;s just a really cool society hacking technique.<p>So how does a bill become a law with regards to this pronoun stuff? Who were the people who initiated this policy? What motivated them to do it? Who influenced them? Who influenced them? Who funded the whole movement?<p>4chan has been doing research into this by doing enough trolling that they got the ok hand sign classified as a hate symbol. It seems, based on following the timeline on that phenomenon that a lot of what is considered forbidden in our culture is generated by certain 3 and 4 letter non-profits who feed that information to Google, Facebook, and others. That&#x27;s just the negative part of it all though: how behavior becomes forbidden.<p>I want to know how behavior, like the pronoun stuff, becomes prescribed. I want to use that machinery to get society to do strange stuff as civilization level performance art.
评论 #21178082 未加载
wozerover 5 years ago
Not directly related, but I&#x27;m a bit afraid that as someone who is not a native speaker of English, it becomes more and more difficult not to inadvertantly cause a shit storm on American websites. People seem to become incredibly sensitive to &quot;correct speech&quot;.
评论 #21174123 未加载
评论 #21173992 未加载
评论 #21174330 未加载
评论 #21178241 未加载
评论 #21173889 未加载
评论 #21174366 未加载
throwaway8451over 5 years ago
Might be a bit meta but could it be that there&#x27;s a pretty widespread attitude of &#x27;wanting to be offended&#x27; and black and white &#x27;with me or against me&#x27; thinking in America (sorry if over-generalizing here), judging from what I get to see on Twitter?<p>How&#x27;s a society supposed to work like this? Could it be that assuming good faith more often might be a starting point for a solution to a lot of problems, this one included?
评论 #21175248 未加载
Marazanover 5 years ago
This person seems to think using &#x27;they&#x27; as a singular is somehow wrong in English.<p>That&#x27;s not correct. It&#x27;s been used since the 1500s and it was only when the wave of idiot Victoria grammar prescriptivists started throwing weight around that there was any dispute at all.
评论 #21174110 未加载
评论 #21174382 未加载
评论 #21174613 未加载
评论 #21174109 未加载
评论 #21174116 未加载
评论 #21174855 未加载
评论 #21176685 未加载
mlthoughts2018over 5 years ago
This is a side question, but in regards to the actual gendered pronoun discussion that seems to be at the center of the policy debate, what even is the specific set of criteria being used?<p>It seems like someone is lobbying that moderators <i>must</i> refer to others with pronouns that the other person chooses. Doesn’t this obviously have unsolvable problems, in principle?<p>- most of the time, responses on a Stack Overflow site are content-specific (“clinical”) and should not necessarily make reference to another human at all (and probably should make efforts to avoid such references as often as possible, for writing clarity).<p>- when referencing another comment or answer or something, dry scientific writing that does so without attributable language attaching it to a person would be less controversial, more clear, and less likely to bring subjective opinions into a matter of reference.<p>- you could always make all references revert to a chosen username and restructure language to have no concept of gender, which for clinical writing is a huge positive aspect, and is in no way connected to the preferences of those being referred to (by matter of it being clinical, not by any matter of status of gender identity)<p>- even if you assume you did need to refer by pronoun, how could Person A know what pronoun Person B wishes to be referred by, unless explicitly stated somewhere?<p>- how could you prove negative intent when choosing not to use certain pronouns, as opposed to a mistake, or pronoun identity that was not publicly known, etc.?<p>I’m just curious how such a thing could ever conceivably be part of a policy that restricts or controls clinical writing style in the moderation of a forum. Regardless of all the moderator drama, it just appears to me like a type of policy that functionally cannot exist, regardless of whether a corporate entity declares it a policy or not.
评论 #21174247 未加载
评论 #21173935 未加载
michannneover 5 years ago
&gt; An employee with a &quot;director&quot; title posted and pinned a message saying the company is changing the CoC to require use of preferred pronouns and avoiding them is forbidden. I asked questions, most importantly: would it now be a violation of this new policy to write in the gender-neutral way that I already use? And how are you judging &quot;avoiding&quot;, which requires knowledge of intent? Other people had questions and issues too. One moderator pointed out a problem with something I was proposing to do and I agreed after it was explained and said I wouldn&#x27;t do that. The employee did not stay to field questions, but came back a couple hours later to tell me &quot;we&#x27;ve been as clear as we can and your values are out of alignment&quot;.<p>In what world is this type of action supposed to be praised?
评论 #21174165 未加载
terfwarsover 5 years ago
I am left leaning and have actively supported the LGBT community, campaigned for marriage equality and helped raise someone who is LGBT and who suffered from brutal bullying in school.<p>I have moved away from actively supporting the LGBT community but I still support my friends and family. I did this because the toxicity and witch hunting has gotten out of hand. We all used to fight the good fight. But the community has transitioned into a culture that is creating an increasing number of rules and tribes in order to differentiate themselves from the rest of society and in order to &#x27;trap&#x27; outsiders into making a faux pas and then elevate themselves by pointing out the mistake. My sense is that this is a vocal minority in the LGBT community, but also highly influential, and that influence comes through fear of being called out.<p>If you&#x27;d like to see examples of some of the toxicity inside the LGBT community itself, just do a search on TERF (Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist) on Reddit: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;search&#x2F;?q=TERF" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;search&#x2F;?q=TERF</a><p>The LGBT community is managing to alienate those who used to vocally support them. I think all of us hoped that we would some day be one people. Instead there is a persecution underway of anyone who is not LGBT - and merely pointing this out will see me accused of engaging in hate speech.<p>As a side note: The comment thread here is a bloodbath, in case you hadn&#x27;t noticed. Massive swings up upvoted and downvoted posts. The LGBT community will no doubt explain this away as haters and extremists who waded in and downvoted anything supportive. In fact many of us are supporters of human equality. We just don&#x27;t support persecution, witch hunts and people who need to bring others down to elevate themselves.
评论 #21174596 未加载
评论 #21174433 未加载
wwarnerover 5 years ago
This is a case in which a Code of Conduct actually creates confusion instead of dispelling it. The more I think about it the sadder it is. It&#x27;s tragic when there should be a rule but when you reach for it you find instead there is an empty space surrounded by razor wire where a rule should be.
评论 #21175286 未加载
alexwennerbergover 5 years ago
I don&#x27;t find it to be unreasonable. If a trans person clearly states that her pronouns are &quot;she&#x2F;her&quot; and you twist your sentences around to avoid using pronouns at all, that could certainly give the impression that you don&#x27;t recognize her identity as valid. I am not saying OP did this or did this intentionally but it&#x27;s not an unreasonable policy. It sounds to me (without being intimately familiar with the situation) that OP has esoteric stylistic preferences that are not transphobic but happen to be consistent with the language that transphobic people will use.<p>Pronoun use is pretty straightforward. If someone says their pronouns, you use their pronouns to refer to them, just like you would anyone else. It may feel a little disorienting if you don&#x27;t talk to many trans people and, for example, they use singular &quot;they&quot; or have a pronoun that seems different than the one that you would naturally assign to them based on their appearance, but it&#x27;s not difficult and you can get used to it pretty quickly.<p>The reason that people are so sensitive and strict about this is because the stakes for trans people are very high -- some people don&#x27;t believe trans people exist, should exist, or should have the same rights as cis people. Refusing to use the right pronouns reveals either a benign misunderstanding about trans people or a willful hostility towards their existence. The latter is extremely common and can be both hurtful and often scary, as trans people, especially trans people of color, are often subject to violence because of their identities.
评论 #21174030 未加载
评论 #21174766 未加载
评论 #21174016 未加载
评论 #21174867 未加载
ph33tover 5 years ago
In short ... too many people take themselves too seriously. too many people reading the intent to malign from internet postings made by people intending to help.
rjf72over 5 years ago
It seems all sites that rely on free labor for moderation end up with similar sorts of problems. Moderation is time consuming, tedious, and thankless work when done well. Who wants to spend hours doing this each day without any financial incentive? You end up getting folks attracted to having some degree of power over people, or ability to enforce or espouse their own views&#x2F;values&#x2F;ideologies, and so on. But all of these motivations are completely antithetical to what the position &#x27;ought&#x27; be about - which is essentially a digital janitor.<p>Pay moderators and the problem goes away since you now attract a pretty normal pool of people whose motivations might be earning a buck, or career advancement. I think we can see that clearly enough here where it&#x27;s self evident that the moderators are paid. The problem of course is imagine a larger site wants 100 moderators. OK, you can get 100 people who are going to do a mixed job at best, but for free. Or you can pay $3,000,000 a year for the same team. Most companies? Easy decision. That&#x27;s a $3 million executive bonus right there!
评论 #21175263 未加载
throws_genderover 5 years ago
This was touched on briefly in the article, but maybe someone else here can shed some light on this here.<p>Is it not super confusing for gender neutral to use the &#x27;they&#x27; pronoun? It&#x27;s already in use in the English language. Every time I&#x27;ve heard people try to use it in conversation it&#x27;s sounded like an Abbott and Costello routine.
评论 #21173877 未加载
评论 #21174044 未加载
评论 #21173982 未加载
评论 #21173980 未加载
评论 #21173897 未加载
评论 #21174252 未加载
评论 #21174021 未加载
评论 #21173942 未加载
评论 #21174312 未加载
评论 #21174217 未加载
reilly3000over 5 years ago
I know this isn&#x27;t what is at issue here, but I can&#x27;t help but feel it&#x27;s connected:<p>Gendered language runs deep, especially in languages like Spanish. Essentially anything ending in &#x27;a&#x27; is considered feminine, and anything ending in &#x27;o&#x27; is considered masculine. How could one hope to bring equality or neutrality to such language? It almost seems like a new language altogether would be easier than fighting to modify thousand-year histories and trillions of written words.<p>I&#x27;m all for healthy dialog that leads to ending oppressive norms, building compassion and inclusion. This situation feels like its own form of oppression, and as such ought to be questioned, if not resisted.<p>I honestly think everybody at the table here is trying to do the right thing as they see it, yet almost everyone is going to walk away hurt; there are no winners.
ng12over 5 years ago
I don&#x27;t understand why this has become such a common theme in the tech world. A small clique of non-binary&#x2F;LGBTQ+ people who wield undue amounts of soft power and use that soft power to fight pseudo-political internet battles. I&#x27;ve yet to experience this with any other subculture I&#x27;m involved in.
评论 #21175205 未加载
评论 #21174889 未加载
评论 #21175237 未加载
评论 #21176560 未加载
评论 #21174161 未加载
nabdabover 5 years ago
There is an awefull lot of gender neutral references in the CTO’s apology, even though it obviously knows that the fired moderators preferred pronouns are the female gendered ones. Someone should edit to remove all the gender neutral references to make a point how silly such a policy is.
vagab0ndover 5 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;08&#x2F;stick-figure-guide.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;08&#x2F;stick-figure-guide.html</a>
评论 #21174185 未加载
jumpingmiceover 5 years ago
I&#x27;ve seen first-hand people whining online that someone used the initialism &quot;LGBT&quot; which apparently can be considered exclusionary by some people. It seems that &quot;LGBTQIAGNC&quot; exists and may be more expansive, however I can&#x27;t rule out the existence of some person who objects to even this.
评论 #21174283 未加载
评论 #21173950 未加载
评论 #21174158 未加载
laurexover 5 years ago
At the risk of making mistakes here, where I&#x27;ve come to personally, in a journey to understand myself, is that the idea of gender seems artificial in general, for the most part. I&#x27;ve been in a relationship with someone who felt strongly about being identified &quot;correctly&quot; when they had transitioned, and also with people who absolutely assume they&#x27;ll be identified &quot;correctly,&quot; when they had never particularly explored an alternative to how they were designated at birth. For me, I&#x27;m not upset when gender pronouns are applied to me, but I&#x27;d prefer to not be identified this way, even though I often feel since identification with the cultural experience of being identified as gendered.<p>I&#x27;ve had some frustration that &quot;they&quot; has become the &quot;neutral&quot; pronoun, when earlier I felt more personally identified with pronouns that still disambiguated plural and singular more clearly, but a friend pointed out that if referring to an unidentified singular person, &quot;they&quot; is perfectly grammatical (i.e. &quot;did someone deliver the mail?&quot; &quot;Yes, they did.&quot;). I am concerned that so much of the focus is placed on the problem of the word, without acknowledging the more fundamental question of willingness to consider if gendered pronouns are necessary.<p>What seems problematic for me is trying to strike a balance between personal identity and &quot;correct&quot; speech. Most of the time, &quot;making sure&quot; that a gender is assigned in speech doesn&#x27;t feel relevant to actually understanding general meaning. I appreciate language that better avoids pronouns rather than uses them as a means to add clarity. It feels to me that is possible to respect gender identity without requiring language to be gendered in a general way. At the same time, I&#x27;ve myself tried to take gender out of my speech and I fall constantly.<p>Fundamentally, it feels like a cultural moment where it feels like we&#x27;re focusing on very black and white ideas and feeling that others are &quot;not listening,&quot; or on the other hand, &quot;forcing me to do something I feel uncomfortable about and lying in wait for me to make a mistake.&quot; When there&#x27;s a possiblity for openness, there&#x27;s also the possibility of vulnerability, whereas in a cultural context, it seems like we&#x27;re moving towards walls and fortification, which makes me pretty sad and concerned that there&#x27;s not space for nuance.
评论 #21174473 未加载
ben_jonesover 5 years ago
&gt; The tone of the answer was pretty combative and people downvoted for that reason (as noted in comments). OP interpreted downvotes as transphobia. There was another answer that said something like &quot;cultural awareness &#x2F; different cultures, as part of D&amp;I&quot; that was presented positively and got a lot of support. (I know gender != culture; I&#x27;m pointing out that another D&amp;I answer, presented constructively, was well-received.)<p>Seems like an age old tale of management assessing a situations potential liability as high, and promptly responding with a zero tolerance policy and throwing someone under the bus to protect themselves.
m-p-3over 5 years ago
What a mess of a slippery slope..
Lazareover 5 years ago
Stack Overflow has handled the communication and PR side of this about as badly as a company can, and I started - and still want to be - on the side of the moderators.<p>However, as near as I can tell from piecing together the different leaks, it turns out a core issue was that Monica Cellio refused to use the singular &quot;they&quot; construction, <i>including when she knew that was someone&#x27;s preferred pronoun</i>.<p>In my view she is 1) objectively grammatically wrong and 2) just being needlessly rude. And ultimately, I can&#x27;t bring myself to support this position at all. If you lost your moderator role because of a refusal to use a widely used and accepted English construction, even though you knew this refusal would hurt people, then uh, I hope you&#x27;re happy with your life choices, but I have no sympathy for you.
评论 #21198473 未加载
wolcoover 5 years ago
Isn&#x27;t a mod a volunteer position? Why waste years working for free without any control?
评论 #21173875 未加载
评论 #21173926 未加载
评论 #21173949 未加载
评论 #21173854 未加载
评论 #21173852 未加载
评论 #21173879 未加载
评论 #21173844 未加载
rdiddlyover 5 years ago
If referring to someone by the correct pronoun is respectful, referring to them by their <i>name</i> is even more respectful in my book. Or avoid talking <i>about</i> them in the third person where possible and only talk <i>to</i> them, for example. These are among the ways of &quot;writing around&quot; the pronoun, and they&#x27;re both <i>more</i> respectful than using the pronoun. I suspect they&#x27;re more constructive and efficient in other ways too, but would have to pay attention to see whether that&#x27;s true. Anyway, if English is like code, all the pronoun solutions are currently hacks, so I&#x27;m all in favor of refactoring to avoid them.
评论 #21176744 未加载
throwaway8291over 5 years ago
Language is a sensible thing, and draws all kinds of demarcations. A single word can shift the perception of a person. A circle might identify an outlier by just a slip of tongue.<p>If you are from another socioeconomic stratum (or somewhere else in the capital quadrant), you might never learn a certain language, that provides a common ground. There are unspeakable things, I can think of, that I would never ever bring up in a conversation with a random person.<p>These exclusions and inclusion have already been there, it seems like some fights are more naked now, uncovered, harsh and sometimes meaningless to someone not involved.<p>I was a top SO contributor and very much enjoyed the site - and still enjoy finding answers. I fear, I will be policed at some point for something - but maybe not, because I am usually agreeable - but who knows: only time will tell.<p>Edit: I am usually not that impartial, but there is a discourse (where this particular thread might belong to), where I am not able to take sides - because my gut feeling says: you cannot shift the responsibility you have, when you interact with another person, to some abstract law, entity, or something else - it has to be you, to show respect and to allow for a common room for everyone - which does not mean, that the room is just there of one.
Waterluvianover 5 years ago
I identify as a gender akin to a math wizard. The correct pronoun is a newly discovered prime number, unique each time. You know my preferred pronoun so please don&#x27;t use &quot;they.&quot;<p>Now this seems absurd but dare you call me out on it and tell me I&#x27;m not actually who I am? Are we all entitled to commanding everyone&#x27;s use of the language by constructing and dictating pronoun usage?<p>I&#x27;ve had an easy time with gender issues in my life because I&#x27;m pretty carefree and accommodating. But I&#x27;m trying to understand where it goes from here.<p>I don&#x27;t see how we can go past he&#x2F;she&#x2F;they because it opens the floodgates to an infinite number of more pronouns, does it not? How does any group get to decide which new pronouns have enough subscribers to be added to the official list?<p>It feels like in a gender fluid model, pronouns just don&#x27;t work. &quot;He&quot; and &quot;she&quot; are legacy and &quot;they&quot; is the catch all. So I kind of get this idea of just not using them anymore. But does that feel manifestly absurd to anyone else?<p>This is also why I enjoy the internet so much. Gender doesn&#x27;t matter and I have mastered picturing everyone as a cat on a keyboard.
pkayeover 5 years ago
People are worried about pronouns meanwhile the supreme court is revisiting the LGBTQ workplace protections laws... <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.vox.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;10&#x2F;2&#x2F;20883827&#x2F;supreme-court-lgbtq-discrimination-title-vii-civil-rights-gay-trans-queer" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.vox.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;10&#x2F;2&#x2F;20883827&#x2F;supreme-court-lgbtq-d...</a>
einpoklumover 5 years ago
This storm is really _not_ about gender pronouns, nor about the use of singular &quot;they&quot;, nor about inclusivity.<p>It is all about how StackExchange Inc. is managing the StackExchange network; and the liberties it allows itself vis-a-vis individual moderators and the community at large.<p>The fiasco is that the answers to these two questions are really bad.
sawmuraiover 5 years ago
And that’s why I am not twitter anymore ^^ just one giant minefield
anm89over 5 years ago
I don&#x27;t think anybody is in the wrong here. These types of forums are communal in nature, they are the sum of the people who use them. There is really no right or wrong here, if a thing bothers enough people within a community for them to speak up then rule changes should be made if that is the consensus based o. The power structure. If those rule changes push community members away then that is a natural consequence.<p>But all of the above is why I feel that it is unwise to engage with these types of communities or at least that you need to be very selective when you do. It&#x27;s either a dictatorship or mob rule and if you buy into these communities as part of your identity with out being sure your values are aligned with it&#x27;s, you&#x27;re bound to end up frustrated.
hirundoover 5 years ago
It&#x27;s hard to know what people want to be called, but there&#x27;s a technical fix for that: add keywords to comments, etc., so that Stack Overflow can know it for you. E.g.<p>&quot;%pronoun% was a legend in %possessive-pronoun%&#x27;s own mind.&quot;<p>Just another markup feature. Let people enter their pronouns in their profiles, and simply substitute them as needed. This at least relieves the burden of knowing the intimate preferences of strangers. Use something neutral, like xe, and xer, for the default, and let users choose their own defaults.<p>But if this is about something other than sparing people&#x27;s feelings then this wouldn&#x27;t help.
评论 #21175955 未加载
cryptozeusover 5 years ago
Disagreement between mod and policy makers is hardly a stack Overflow fiasco.
评论 #21174223 未加载
hendersoonover 5 years ago
The argument came down to &quot;call people what they want to be called&quot; vs. &quot;don&#x27;t call people what they don&#x27;t want to be called&quot;. The banned moderator preferred the latter. Either seems perfectly fine to me but I don&#x27;t belong to any of the impacted minorities myself.<p>Firing someone, even from a volunteer position, over that specific argument seems like a severe overreaction. Assuming we got the whole story, of course.<p>Internet drama. Tempest in a teapot.
RobertRobertsover 5 years ago
Compelled speech should be illegal.<p>What if my preferred pronoun is &quot;lordmasterofall&quot;? Can I call on the full force of the law to demand its use?
评论 #21175170 未加载
blondinover 5 years ago
tangent but, omg livejournal is back?!
评论 #21173834 未加载
sword_smithover 5 years ago
Seeing that the instigator&#x27;s post is the most downvoted I have ever come across on Stack Exchange, I thought of the saying &quot;the Revolution devours its children&quot;.
King-Aaronover 5 years ago
Personally, I go to stack overflow to find out about problems with my code, not about what set of genitals a person has.
Simulacraover 5 years ago
Shouldn&#x27;t the point be to reduce conflict and increase communication? I don&#x27;t see that here...
scarejunbaover 5 years ago
What happens to a sentence like &quot; Elle est intelligente&quot;. Do the conjugations change to be neuter?
评论 #21174624 未加载
Wowfunhappyover 5 years ago
Edit: Never mind
评论 #21174743 未加载
djsumdogover 5 years ago
This is a topic no one can talk about today. Previous discussions on this on HN quickly dropped off the page.<p>I&#x27;ve always found the concept of preferred gender pronouns to be problematic from a pure technical perspective. But I was so afraid of the stigma I haven&#x27;t really written about it. Recent events made me finally publish this last night:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;battlepenguin.com&#x2F;philosophy&#x2F;perspective&#x2F;preferred-gender-pronouns&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;battlepenguin.com&#x2F;philosophy&#x2F;perspective&#x2F;preferred-g...</a><p>The summary: pronouns reduce cognitive load, because you can refer to someone by a broad category. With custom pronouns, you now create a way to offend someone in the base language.
评论 #21174355 未加载
评论 #21174357 未加载
评论 #21174792 未加载
burneraccount12over 5 years ago
60 million starving children in Africa. Something like 25,000 people die every year to war. The US president, leader of the free world, is facing possible impeachment.<p>And what are we worried about? Pronoun use and codes of conduct on software Q&amp;A websites.<p>Give. Me. A. Break.<p>Almost 2,000 words on it, no less. Talk about 15 minutes of my life I&#x27;ll never have back.<p>I&#x27;m trying to think if there&#x27;s something dumber to argue about than this, but right now I can&#x27;t.<p>Not sure how the world will continue to spin on its axis what with the bloodbath of moderators on StackExchange but somehow the universe will find a way to carry on.
评论 #21175053 未加载
评论 #21175024 未加载
评论 #21175010 未加载
评论 #21177616 未加载
gcb0over 5 years ago
Is this the new hollywood black list&#x2F;red scare?<p>Tech behemoths, full of privileged people on top, use the false pretense of respecting pronouns or other minority demands, to actually oust people that care about such issues in the first place?
eej2ya1Kover 5 years ago
This is what happens when corporate codes meet kindergarten mindsets. The longer this continues, the worse the blowback is going to get - I&#x27;m just happy to be far enough away to not have to care (protip: get the fuck out of the anglosphere as soon as possible)
评论 #21173967 未加载
评论 #21174064 未加载
评论 #21174024 未加载
评论 #21173966 未加载
0x262dover 5 years ago
these comments are a cesspool
XPKBandMaidCzunover 5 years ago
I have a WIP theory about this type of person on social media.<p>This isn&#x27;t about validation or inclusion, if it was, it&#x27;d have been over <i>years</i> ago. We&#x27;re deep in malingering territory now.<p>1. Creating a divisive persona &#x2F; Integration<p>Their bio may mention their membership in an off topic, but sensitive, divisive and prickly issue. The goal is to draw attention to the sensitive issue in the next phases.<p>They join the group, sometimes not even in the actual working parts of it, but after party social&#x2F;meta scenes.<p>2. Exposure and Hijacking<p>They will tend to put themselves into conversation, conferences, etc. in preparation and in compulsion recreate the issue. The goal is to shift people focused diligently to shift their attention to being a caregiver not for their project or teammates, but to <i>them</i>.<p>3. Special VIP treatment<p>Then they get a big smirk when people when management get tongue tied trying to navigate it gracefully. We&#x27;ve seen many surprising public concessions to these types, sometimes based off very flimsy reasons. Which tends to <i>really annoy</i> people who just want to work.<p>Passerbys also unwittingly aid their endeavors, mistakenly believing they&#x27;re helping someone disenfranchised and in need.<p>4. Consolidating (destruction)<p>When they get the thumbs up on being VIP, they can now consolidate their gains and show what the world is like when only their feelings are cared for.<p>Cancel culture, trying to ruin people&#x27;s careers, get them banned, getting in fights with their bosses and chain of command etc. This way they can solidify their need for special treatment.<p>It&#x27;s a continual loop of positive reinforcement for them. Since people in power and passerby always cave to them, unwittingly creating more division in an already annoyed community.<p>5. Preservation &#x2F; Preemption<p>To draw the sting of critics, they beat them to the punch by calling <i>them</i> entitled and privileged. Further accuse critics can&#x27;t grasp and judge their unique plight and never can. Demonstrating evidence of hypocrisy simply validates their presupposition they&#x27;re underdogs being hounded. So they can repeat and get more concessions and attention.<p>Other facets: My original theory is it was validation based. It maybe play a role, it&#x27;s a multi-faceted thing, such as feeling ashamed of their activity some how and want to &quot;come out&quot; in public. But if it was <i>just</i> that, wouldn&#x27;t they get it off their chest and just over it?
busterarmover 5 years ago
SO seemed all crazypants to me years ago when all of the moderators started zealously closing down topics as off-topic or duplicate that the moderator had clearly misunderstood.<p>That desire to maintain some precious perfect garden of facts drove me to leave and never look back. Glad I did.
recycler02over 5 years ago
I&#x27;ve been watching Ken Burns&#x27; &quot;The Civil War&quot;. There was a bit that got me thinking about something which I&#x27;ve had trouble fully defining.<p>In one of the episodes, a historian talks about the simplicity of the values of the soldiers in that war. He marvels at how they were willing to march a mile and a half across an open field against a fortified enemy position. Think of the Union soldiers at Fredericksburg or the Confederate soldiers under Hood at Franklin. The historian also talks about how, were he in that situation, he feels like his response might have been &quot;Sir, I don&#x27;t believe that&#x27;s a good idea sir&quot; but how they bore it year after year and slaughter after slaughter.<p>Someone misgendering another person is a cruelty, just like any bully teasing a vulnerable person. There have always been cruel people though.<p>Juxtaposing that example of historical resilience against the increasingly baroque etiquette we require to insulate ourselves from experiencing garden variety cruelty, there&#x27;s an incongruency that bothers me. Why could they bear that but we cannot bear this?
paul7986over 5 years ago
Give it 20 to 30 years and he or she won&#x27;t be used anymore. It will become an HR issue.<p>Things change.
评论 #21173936 未加载
评论 #21174014 未加载
评论 #21174212 未加载