Is it possible to prevent the assister from actually executing the commands on your system?<p>I could use this in a lot more places if the assister could see my screen/output and propose commands for me to run, but I was still in control of what commands are executed. (i.e. if I could safely use this as part of the customer support process for my customers, I would be extremely willing to pay for it).
If you're working on the same machine (say via SSH) you can also share a session with tmux.<p><a href="https://www.hamvocke.com/blog/remote-pair-programming-with-tmux/" rel="nofollow">https://www.hamvocke.com/blog/remote-pair-programming-with-t...</a>
Why would I pay money for a thing that already exists and is free?<p><a href="https://tmate.io" rel="nofollow">https://tmate.io</a>
It's perhaps worth noting that the with the venerable GNU Screen, you can more or less achieve this by enabling multiuser mode and then doing screen -x.
Honest question:<p>What's the difference with tmate? I haven't seen a reference to it in the site and it looks pretty similar in purpose and usage from a quick look.
There isn't a link to terms of the subscription, at least I couldn't find one on mobile. Is the single user license for a single host or a single assister? Do both users need a license? Is it per device or per person?
Do you allow outright all and any commands in the terminal, sudo and all?<p>Does the data go through your pipes at all or strictly between assist clients?
$5/month/user seems high when you're not providing any hosting. Also you need at least $10/month to actually do anything which again seems high.<p>This type of software should really be something like $30-$60/license and $10-$20 upgrade fee for latest version.