It seems astonishing to me that the UK authorities let all 60 of these doctors perform an in depth medical assessment of Assange, but if that's the conclusion they came to, we should absolutely follow their advice.<p>>They based their assessment on "harrowing eyewitness accounts" of his October 21 court appearance in London and a November 1 report by Nils Melzer, the United Nations special rapporteur on torture.<p>Oh right, so actually these 60 doctors have put their name to a letter despite having never even spoken to or seen Assange, but instead have decided to just take a punt. I don't know why wikileaks keep pumping out such dross (I lie, I know exactly why).