I suggest changing the post URL to be the source ICANN post, <a href="https://www.icann.org/news/blog/org-update" rel="nofollow">https://www.icann.org/news/blog/org-update</a><p>The only content added by the original URL (<a href="https://domainnamewire.com/2019/12/10/icann-delays-org-sale-approval-calls-for-more-transparency/" rel="nofollow">https://domainnamewire.com/2019/12/10/icann-delays-org-sale-...</a>) is a link to the
webcast meeting referenced in the PDF letter linked in the ICANN blog. It is <a href="https://domainnamewire.com/2019/12/10/video-watch-the-qa-with-ethos-internet-society-and-pir/" rel="nofollow">https://domainnamewire.com/2019/12/10/video-watch-the-qa-wit...</a>
Now ICANN can show its true colors. Is this just more smoke and mirrors just so they can absolve themselves of responsibility while still sheepishly approving this heist when the drama has had time to die down? Or will they act and relieve PIR of the stewardship of the .org tld?