TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Slab – Team Wiki and Knowledge Base

14 pointsby utopian3over 5 years ago

5 comments

Nextgridover 5 years ago
I had the displeasure of using this at a previous client. It&#x27;s a good example of form over function. It looks decent, but is an absolute nightmare to use:<p>* No Markdown editing support, only wysiwyg. Certain Markdown control characters will start wysiwyg markup blocks but not stop them, overall making it terrible to use.<p>* Markdown imports are bad. Valid Markdown that renders fine in StackEdit has trouble when imported into Slab. Ended up using StackEdit to render to HTML and then pasting the HTML.<p>* No Markdown export, so you can&#x27;t export the existing text in Markdown so you can edit it in a decent editor instead of the shit wysiwyg.<p>* No &quot;save&quot; button. It&#x27;s supposed to save incrementally and I guess it also saves when you exit out of edit mode, but honestly I would not trust it on a flaky connection. Just give me a good old save button when I have real feedback when the document is saved in the form of a page reload.<p>* It lags. They have managed to make <i>text</i> lag. It&#x27;s a sad but nevertheless very impressive achievement. I wonder how many NPM packages they have in their dependency graph. The entire product just feels bloated and you start being scared to click anywhere because it&#x27;ll cause a good 1-second delay during which your CPU will be at 100%.<p>With these limitations I wouldn&#x27;t take it for free, let alone 35$&#x2F;month.
评论 #21960038 未加载
mooted1over 5 years ago
Disappointed to see the usual onslaught of HN cynicism.<p>&quot;Product doesn&#x27;t meet my narrow expectations; is bad product.&quot;<p>1. We use Slab. It&#x27;s a fairly ok product in a crowded space. Needs maturity. Far better than confluence.<p>2. I have had no experience with the lag that another commenter insists is a product killer, and I write and edit docs all day.<p>3. The niche this product and others like it solve is to keep your entire company&#x27;s docs <i>organized</i> and <i>discoverable</i>. Remembering to file things away correctly, share content, and do full text search on google drive is... not a good experience.<p>4. Editor is pretty solid and responsive. If you know markdown it&#x27;s a breeze. Literally can&#x27;t understand why you&#x27;d want to edit raw markdown when the WYSIWYG reflects markdown syntax as well as it does.
评论 #21961850 未加载
markdownover 5 years ago
No demo?
throwGuardianover 5 years ago
Can anybody familiar with this vertical comment on tends, leaders and&#x2F;or opportunities in this vertical (team wiki&#x2F;knowledge-base)<p>Per my research, this space is crawling with options:<p>1. Coda<p>2. Notion<p>3. Tettra<p>4. Wrike<p>5. Confluence<p>6. Box Notes<p>7. Dropbox Paper<p>8. Slab<p>9. Basecamp<p>10. MSFT Teams (in a way)<p>11. Click Up<p>12. MSFT SharePoint<p>13. Marvin<p>14. Monday.com<p>15. Many many smaller notes apps
datashowover 5 years ago
Curious to know why would anyone want to use this kind of service instead of the wiki &#x2F; discussion &#x2F; documentation &#x2F; issue tracking provided by the project management system? I know this service can &quot;integrate&quot; (mostly just links) with other system. I still don&#x27;t see what the value added of this system can overcome the pain of using two systems.<p>May be mostly for teams do not use project management?