TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Life of a Data Byte

60 pointsby severineabout 5 years ago

6 comments

flohofwoeabout 5 years ago
&gt; UTF-8 is the standard for representing characters as eight bits, allowing every code-point between 0-127 to be stored in a single byte...<p>Hmm... this makes it sound like UTF-8 uses one byte per codepoint and can&#x27;t encode codepoints beyond 127, when it actually is a variable-length encoding where one codepoint is encoded into 8 to 48 bits (1 to 6 bytes, although in practice 1 to 4 bytes are sufficient to encode all currently defined UNICODE codepoints).<p>The same is true for UTF-16, it&#x27;s not &quot;16 bits per codepoint&quot;, but variable length with either 16- or 32-bits per codepoint. Only UTF-32 is a fixed-width encoding.<p>Basically: all UTF encodings are able to encode all UNICODE codepoints.
评论 #22546942 未加载
hawkjoabout 5 years ago
Cool article. Another future method is the use of DNA (e.g. [1], [2]). Not good for speed, but with more development it could become a great solution for large-volume, low-access archival data.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.microsoft.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;research&#x2F;project&#x2F;dna-storage&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.microsoft.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;research&#x2F;project&#x2F;dna-storage...</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.catalogdna.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.catalogdna.com</a>
als0about 5 years ago
&gt; Optane claims performance 1,000 faster than NAND SSDs with 1,000 times the performance, while being four to five times the price of flash memory. Optane is proof that storage class memory is not just experimental.<p>This was a very bold claim from Intel. That was in 2015. It’s 2020 and I haven’t seen any benchmarks that meet this. And it’s not clear the roadmap is going to scale to that figure. Right now it’s still not quite good enough to be a main memory (but as a caching tier between main memory and disk).
jlangemeierabout 5 years ago
So sad that the mack daddy of removable storage in the late 90&#x27;s isn&#x27;t covered. Jaz disks were freaking boss for all of the 5 years they existed.
broheeabout 5 years ago
Small nit, I&#x27;m pretty sure 1980 5¼&#x27;&#x27; floppies where 360 Kbytes and not the later 1.2 MBytes.
评论 #22549950 未加载
评论 #22548114 未加载
mrspeakerabout 5 years ago
The &quot;rope memory&quot; used on Apollo seems like such a crazy and cool idea. The article has one dead link, and the reference only has a snippet more information. I&#x27;m about to go down a google-hole on it, but can anyone point me to their favorite rope-memory resource?
评论 #22565410 未加载