Ad free-ish at the Sac Bee:<p><a href="https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirus/article241349341.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirus/article241349341.htm...</a><p>If 56% of CA is infected in 2 months then we aren't being told something about this virus.
Can someone submit an article on this topic from a news source that doesn’t completely cover up the story with ads, popovers when you have ad blocking turned on, etc? This website plus Mercury news do the same bullshit.
WOULD be infected if people kept partying. With containment measures and medicine in the pipeline this scenario can be prevented as other countries show.
Isn't it predictable that incidence of infection will be proportional to population density? If so, isn 't the Northeast megalopolis most at risk?
We (the public) are being misled about either the virulency, the morbidity rate, or both, with regards to SARS-CoV-2. The real numbers simply do not match the models.
This is completely unacceptable. If this happens tens of thousands will be dying on the streets and in hospital parking lots. Meanwhile other areas are able to suppress the virus, collectively buying ourselves time to develop therapeutics and vaccines. Major Asian countries are succeeding.