One thing unrelated to your app, but the design of your pricing table.<p>You point out the recommended plan - which jumps out - but it's very difficult to easily compare the plans. My two cents: use graphics (checks or bullets) for included features, leave out features that are the same across the board (like no setup fee), and reduce it to critical features only.<p>The rest of the site looks great, I love the design/UI.
Hosted?<p>I understand they acknowledge this, but I'd be as unlikely to use a product like this as I'd be to use a remote memory profiler. Which is pretty unlikely.<p>I can't quite tell from the launch page what level of detail is conveyed, but if you can tell what gems, method names and data sources are used that could be a competitive advantage. There are plenty of profiling and targeting applications/services that people are unlikely to want to reveal that they're using. I'd also be concerned about the increased visibility an attacker might be able to gain into a public application.<p>I saw that a "firewall" edition is in the works, and I understand the appeal of ongoing fees with SAAS, but I'm still surprised people are willing to remote out code insight to this level. At least, I haven't seen offers of hosted debuggers, profilers, compilers etc. Has gmail and basecamp really softened up the market that much?