TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Amazon Elastic Container Service now supports Amazon EFS file systems

106 pointsby ifcologneabout 5 years ago

11 comments

txcwpalphaabout 5 years ago
I see a lot of notes about EFS&#x27;s performance in the comments. I figured it&#x27;s at least worth noting, for anyone considering using ECS with EFS, that just last week EFS had its read throughput on its general purpose tier increased by 400%.<p>That probably won&#x27;t solve all EFS performance issues, but it&#x27;s a pretty big boost and a nice announcement to come alongside ECS support.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aws.amazon.com&#x2F;about-aws&#x2F;whats-new&#x2F;2020&#x2F;04&#x2F;amazon-elastic-file-system-announces-increase-in-read-operations-for-general-purpose-file-systems&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aws.amazon.com&#x2F;about-aws&#x2F;whats-new&#x2F;2020&#x2F;04&#x2F;amazon-el...</a>
finaliterationabout 5 years ago
This is great news!<p>Yes, these containers are supposed to be stateless, but I was tasked with converting an app at my previous job over to using ECS on Fargate and we hit so many issues because of the limits on storage per container instance. We ended up having to tweak the heck out of nginx caching configurations and other processes that would generate any &quot;on disk&quot; files to get around the issues. Having EFS available would have made solving some of those problems so much easier.<p>I&#x27;ve also been wanting to use ECS on Fargate for running scheduled tasks with large files (50gb+) but it wasn&#x27;t really possible given the previous 4gb limit on storage.
评论 #22818035 未加载
评论 #22817682 未加载
评论 #22818708 未加载
jbogganabout 5 years ago
Oh man, awesome. We had a rather janky workload where ECS would spin up an EC2 that would then mount an EFS volume and then write a file over to S3. This is going to make that so much easier and cleaner.<p>If you&#x27;re wondering why you&#x27;d ever have to do something like that, the answer is SAP.
koolbaabout 5 years ago
This is going to make a <i>lot</i> of container workloads that were possible, but inconvenient to setup, suddenly trivial to deploy. Very nice!
mark242about 5 years ago
This is the single biggest blocker to running something like Postfix in ECS. This is a huge, huge win.
评论 #22818568 未加载
zapitaabout 5 years ago
How&#x27;s the performance on EFS? Has anyone used it in production that is willing to share their experience?<p>We evaluated it for a relatively simple use case, and the performance seemed abysmal, so we didn&#x27;t select it. I&#x27;m hoping that we made a mistake in our evaluation protocol, which would give me an excuse to give it another try.
评论 #22817763 未加载
评论 #22817846 未加载
评论 #22817909 未加载
评论 #22819142 未加载
geerlingguyabout 5 years ago
Technically it supported it before, but you had to configure everything manually (or with your own automation). Having it native is a lot nicer, and brings provisioning of NFS-style volumes up to par with the current Kubernetes experience.
WatchDogabout 5 years ago
This is going to make running teamcity or jenkins from fargate, much simpler.
rkwasnyabout 5 years ago
EFS performance is just horrible. Running containers on it is asking for problems.<p>My advice, stick to EC2 + EBS, it works.
djsteinabout 5 years ago
FINALLY!!! edit: thanks a lot ECS team
nnxabout 5 years ago
Hope this is added to Lambda soon. EFS scalability would shine with Lambda.