TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

LHC: Better safe than sorry.

21 pointsby Stubbsalmost 17 years ago

6 comments

pmjordanalmost 17 years ago
"Physics" and "conclusive" used together? HA!<p>Besides, if the universe is destroyed, nobody will be around to complain about it.
评论 #229332 未加载
Hexstreamalmost 17 years ago
Considering all the things (none come to mind, sorry) we formerly thought we shouldn't do (because of false beliefs) that turned out to be beneficial in the end, I'd say we should go with the experiments.
mechanical_fishalmost 17 years ago
The good news is that, if we find that it's possible for a civilization like ours to build a machine that can destroy the universe, we'll finally shed some light on that pesky Fermi Paradox.<p>Perhaps I should print up some T-shirts for the occasion: "Humanity: We're Number One!"
ivankiriginalmost 17 years ago
Love it. The precautionary principle is 100% anti-science
评论 #229284 未加载
pavelludiqalmost 17 years ago
it's a better idea to use it to fight aliens than to shoot pigeons with it <a href="http://xkcd.com/401/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/401/</a>
telalmost 17 years ago
It's a bit of satirical DH5. Nice.
评论 #228866 未加载