TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Centralisation and Mastodon

17 pointsby kevqalmost 5 years ago

2 comments

dpc_pwalmost 5 years ago
Fediverse is such a poor design. It&#x27;s utterly futile.<p>The ID is tied to a host, so every time you lose your host, there&#x27;s a lot of work to do, because you don&#x27;t own your account - your host do. You basically have to start from scratch every time, so what&#x27;s the point? Better to use Twitter, at least there&#x27;s some chance they will not dissapear out of the blue.<p>Identities should be self-generated, and independent of any hosting. Fediverse hosting should just facilitate passing stuff when peers are offline. Then it wouldn&#x27;t matter if you&#x27;re on one server or other, because it wouldn&#x27;t be even visible in the UI.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ssbc&#x2F;patchwork" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ssbc&#x2F;patchwork</a> had some more interesting ideas, but AFAIK execution was rather poor.
评论 #23460867 未加载
nightpawsalmost 5 years ago
Mastodon is a difficult one. The decentralisation of users runs contrary to the natural predisposition people have toward following the crowd.<p>As the writer puts it, people need to use other instances, but (myself included as a guilty mastodon.social user) the comfort of being on the bigger boat draws people in since they think it’ll be the last to sink.
评论 #23458064 未加载