As I've been studying news from the last decades I can see certain categories unfolding.
Tech that is available now and was predicted pretty precisely — eg. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/11/magazine/tech-2010-24-all-one-land-plenty-watch-that-your-lifeline-world.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/11/magazine/tech-2010-24-all...</a><p>Ideas that took a lot more time to get implemented — <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/11/magazine/tech-2010-14-feel-secure-the-surveillance-camera-that-picks-out-the-bad-guys.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/11/magazine/tech-2010-14-fee...</a><p>And, essays with ideas that seem even more relevant today — <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20000815060013/http://www.beyond2000.com/news/Jun_00/story_652.html" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20000815060013/http://www.beyond...</a>