TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Google really doesn’t want Honeycomb on phones

36 pointsby ivoflipseabout 14 years ago

7 comments

blubabout 14 years ago
I'm also inclined to think that this is a pragmatic move by Google.<p>Sometimes you have to "close" the source for a period of time to satisfy commercial restrictions and all is well when it is opened again.
评论 #2368033 未加载
评论 #2368451 未加载
Pewpewarrowsabout 14 years ago
No, they don't. They want Ice Cream (the 3.1 version that combines the tablet and phone "forks" of Android) on it. They don't want people trying to hack Honeycomb onto a phone when they know it's going to turn out horribly.
评论 #2368709 未加载
ajaysabout 14 years ago
FTA, quoting Andy Rubin: “To make our schedule to ship the tablet, we made some design tradeoffs. We didn’t want to think about what it would take for the same software to run on phones. It would have required a lot of additional resources and extended our schedule beyond what we thought was reasonable. So we took a shortcut. We have no idea if it will even work on phones.”<p>I'm no Apple Fanboi (I'm a Linux fanboi, if anything), but this shows what a phenomenal job Apple has done with iOS.
评论 #2368983 未加载
ffumarolaabout 14 years ago
If they are truly only closing it temporarily for usability and user experience reasons (e.g. 3.0 won't work well on most phones right now), then I have no problem with it.
评论 #2369267 未加载
Zakabout 14 years ago
Cheap crappy manufacturers are rushing to get the latest version on their phones even if it doesn't work well, while big-name manufacturers use horribly outdated versions that don't work as well as the current one? It seems like only Google cares about actually delivering a good experience to the user.<p>Can someone with insight in to the industry explain this?
评论 #2370981 未加载
willvarfarabout 14 years ago
Until Android is open-source in the public development sense there will always be hope and hype for a properly-free open alternative.<p>What the world really needs is for some small competitor to Google in some space to make a very public attempt to get some tech into the tree. For example, for one of the smallest mapping companies to try and make an API for in-app mapping-services.<p>Then Google will wake up.
评论 #2368078 未加载
trotskyabout 14 years ago
I'm surprised to find out that none of the reused components are GPL besides the kernel. Is the whole tree otherwise licenses like Apache that don't require releasing the sources?
评论 #2368380 未加载