TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Higher math proficiency test: An extended-problem-solving skill evaluation tool

42 pointsby R3G1Ralmost 5 years ago

8 comments

SamReidHughesalmost 5 years ago
I looked at most or all of the questions, before the test system went down. (Cue rant about modern software.)<p>Some of the questions are quite poorly worded, and I&#x27;m highly suspicious about one question with non-integral boundaries on a probability distribution defined over the integers. Since I didn&#x27;t get to see results, I can&#x27;t say whether they screwed up or not.<p>It seems like the question level was appropriate for students that took Calc I&#x2F;II and some course like Discrete Structures.
评论 #23939873 未加载
评论 #23942026 未加载
评论 #23939012 未加载
评论 #23941081 未加载
eindiranalmost 5 years ago
Who is this test aimed at? It mentions the math GRE, which would make me think that it targets people applying to graduate programs, but it doesn&#x27;t really have that vibe and I imagine becoming a test that graduate programs would consider is quite a difficult undertaking.
Traubenfuchsalmost 5 years ago
I pretty much couldn&#x27;t answer a single question. With a lot of time I could have &quot;bruteforced&quot; a few, maybe. Getting something better than a F? Impossible.<p>Soon I will have a MSc in Software Engineering... I simply memorized my way through college math classes, just like most of my colleagues.<p>Math always made me feel dumb. I never had intuition for it. Deeper understanding was always just out of reach. I truly loathe math.
评论 #23953453 未加载
trompalmost 5 years ago
The test fails to show you which answers (it thinks) you got wrong. Which makes is pretty useless...
评论 #23948132 未加载
ogogmadalmost 5 years ago
Haven&#x27;t read the article (it&#x27;s down) but isn&#x27;t the best test for proficiency in higher maths that you can actually <i>do</i> higher maths? Why do we need these proxies?
评论 #23938002 未加载
posix_compliantalmost 5 years ago
Data point: 70%.<p>Background: Software Engineer.<p>I found this to be challenging.
评论 #23948143 未加载
fazza99almost 5 years ago
looks like it&#x27;s been slashdotted.
anonmidniteshpralmost 5 years ago
(The link will not load for me, as of writing.)<p>The US SAT I of the late-1990&#x27;s was far too easy (I only missed one Q with a mis-selected answer, but I&#x27;m no genius and didn&#x27;t study or prep for it one iota (or epsilon, as the case maybe)). Static, multiple-guess Q&amp;A tests aren&#x27;t able to assess a broad range of orders-of-magnitude of capabilities because of their various vulnerabilities.<p>Professional Engineer and physics tests that include fewer, open-ended written-response problems that build on each other tend to be more rigorous forms of domain knowledge testing. Some Q&amp;A can be used as a first-pass filter, but it shouldn&#x27;t be relied-on how the US K-12 under NCLBA leans on excessive multiple-choice standardized testing.