TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Firefox 79

379 pointsby cautionalmost 5 years ago

28 comments

shantaraalmost 5 years ago
Android version comes with a completely new design, and empty &quot;What&#x27;s new&quot; section in Google Play gave no indication it&#x27;s going be such a major change.<p>Even more importantly, it has overridden data collection preferences after the update. Check &quot;Settings &gt; Data collection&quot;. I had to disable &quot;Marketing data&quot; and &quot;Experiments&quot; toggles. Not cool!
评论 #23980230 未加载
评论 #23977707 未加载
评论 #23977451 未加载
评论 #23979595 未加载
评论 #23982723 未加载
评论 #23981231 未加载
评论 #23983231 未加载
评论 #23980328 未加载
评论 #23983985 未加载
评论 #23994024 未加载
评论 #23978626 未加载
评论 #23978654 未加载
评论 #23979239 未加载
评论 #23983368 未加载
评论 #23980523 未加载
jpdusalmost 5 years ago
For me, Fenix on Android is the worst update ever. I use Firefox as my main browser on Android since almost 10 years and my whole mobile workflow depends on the awesome Tab Queue-feature (new tabs from other Apps like Twitter&#x2F;Slack&#x2F;Mails are opened in the background).<p>With Fenix, Mozilla decided to just abandon that feature. Issues are closed, it got removed from the feature list [1] and further questions are ignored. I fully understand that you can&#x27;t keep every feature everywhere, but this was THE main benefit of Firefox (besides ublock) for me and if you look at GitHub&#x2F;Reddit&#x2F;Twitter I am not the only one.<p>Now I have to stick to an outdated browser because of an (for me) completely unnecessary, degrading update :&#x2F;.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mozilla-mobile&#x2F;fenix&#x2F;issues&#x2F;470" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mozilla-mobile&#x2F;fenix&#x2F;issues&#x2F;470</a>
评论 #23985169 未加载
评论 #23984831 未加载
评论 #23984241 未加载
agurkalmost 5 years ago
For Wayland users DMA-BUF video textures are now used when the Video Acceleration API (VA-API) is enabled.<p>I personally saw a number of regressions[0] on Debian testing for video playback on the beta releases for 79, but it largely seems to have settled down now.<p>[0] particularly this one: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=1643855" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=1643855</a><p>(Copied from my comment on the submission for the official release notes)
sp332almost 5 years ago
Firefox releases come out every 6 weeks. It helps to put something in the title that explains what&#x27;s interesting about this one.
评论 #23977202 未加载
评论 #23977195 未加载
评论 #23977338 未加载
评论 #23977575 未加载
nine_kalmost 5 years ago
Highlights:<p>- Return of shared memory between parts of the same page (including web workers). Parallel processing becomes more efficient, good for complex apps and games.<p>- Time-traveling debugger of sorts: search for &quot;restart frame&quot;.
评论 #23980334 未加载
marcopoloalmost 5 years ago
&quot;The reference-types proposal is now supported. It provides a new type, externref, which can hold any JavaScript value, for example strings, DOM references, or objects.&quot;<p>This is exciting! It opens up faster possibilities for wasm apps
saagarjhaalmost 5 years ago
I wonder if we could try something new and have all discussion related to Mozilla or Firefox as a whole, including comparisons to other browsers, privacy, and how much battery it uses on macOS in just one thread so people can collapse it.
评论 #23977718 未加载
评论 #23979442 未加载
freediveralmost 5 years ago
Every few versions I would check Firefox on macOS just to see if they make any progress with battery drain.<p>And... Firefox 79 with one active tab is taking 6x more energy than Safari with 20+ tabs.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;LyhnbKZ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;LyhnbKZ</a><p>Maybe it is better on other OSes, but on macOS nothing beats Webkit in terms of performance.<p>Not to mention the home page bloat - Firefox is starting to look like cnn of browsers.
评论 #23978607 未加载
评论 #23979157 未加载
评论 #23978971 未加载
评论 #23978589 未加载
评论 #23978596 未加载
评论 #23978634 未加载
评论 #23978613 未加载
评论 #23979799 未加载
评论 #23978802 未加载
shultaysalmost 5 years ago
Thumbnails are buggy. Auto complete doesnt work in some cases. No tab reordering, open in new tab order is weird. Home page is worse. No addons... lots of other small annoyances.<p>And worst of it, no about config. I dont like the direction mozilla is taking. Do they have any reasoning for no abour config.<p>This is quite a downgrade, I think I am switching to another browser on mobile.
matsemannalmost 5 years ago
Completely rewamped Android.<p>Feels very snappy. Upgrade was a breeze. Only one addon that didn&#x27;t work, hope full addon support is back soon.
评论 #23984021 未加载
recursivealmost 5 years ago
For me, &quot;Restart stack frame&quot; is probably the biggest impact I&#x27;ve seen in a while.
adrian17almost 5 years ago
Same question as the last time [0]: I see the benefit of wasm extensions and I see how to enable them in &quot;manual&quot; compilation (for rustc, -C target-feature=+bulk-memory), but I didn&#x27;t yet find a documented way of using them in wider used setups like wasm-pack. I&#x27;d love to try recompiling a full project with these features, but I just can&#x27;t find out how to do it.<p>The release notes say &quot;The wasm-bindgen documentation includes guidance for taking advantage of externref from Rust&quot;, but I didn&#x27;t yet find anything about it there either.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23690406" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23690406</a>
jknzalmost 5 years ago
I would hope the key presses required to use the native search among opened tabs had changed.<p>- Ctrl-L to go to the address bar<p>- release Ctrl (otherwise, the next keypress fail)<p>- Shift-6 to type &quot;%&quot; in the address bar<p>- space<p>- [your query and hit tab&#x2F;enter to navigate results]<p>The last bullet is a close to ideal, native search among open tabs and make it so smooth to find an opened tab among dozens. But the key presses necessary to get there? Who can use that without weekly hospital stays for finger RSIs?<p>I love firefox. If someone, somewhere reads this, please please please think of simpler key presses to use this nice, already built functionality.<p>(I know non-native extensions provide similar feature. But native would be so cool and stable, especially that it&#x27;s already built).
评论 #23980553 未加载
评论 #23980049 未加载
评论 #23991181 未加载
ComodoHackeralmost 5 years ago
In 78 they&#x27;ve added a persistent Google search as a top line in URL bar drop-down list. I couldn&#x27;t find it documented anywhere neither in release notes nor in help topics.<p>Does anyone by chance knows how to remove it?
评论 #23982944 未加载
hackcasualalmost 5 years ago
A lot of good WebAssembly stuff in there. WASM threads, bulk memory ops are big performance wins, and reference types huge for DOM interoperation.
tumblewitalmost 5 years ago
Firefox 80 is scheduled to come with vaapi for X11 which will be a major release for those with distro like PopOS or those that use i3wm
lytefmalmost 5 years ago
This update has, for the first time in over 10 years, rendered Firefox pretty much unusable for me on Ubuntu: Both the URL and the search bar are completely broken - neither autocomplete nor searching via google&#x2F;DDG works. The only way to open a URL is to type it in full. Not cool. I guess I should move to ESR.
The_rationalistalmost 5 years ago
does &quot;better source map for SCSS&quot; means that devtools will show scss variables ? big if true
formerly_provenalmost 5 years ago
Doesn&#x27;t contain a fix for the tearing on Windows 10 with Hardware Graphics Scheduling.
sam_goodyalmost 5 years ago
It&#x27;s a small thing, but I have found the usage of the logical and&#x2F;or&#x2F;null to be much cleaner.<p>a ??= 3;<p>(It would be even nicer if it could mean the same thing in PHP.)
50almost 5 years ago
Sweet! This update fixes the issue where you weren&#x27;t able to play videos on Firefox 78 with the MacOS Big Sur Beta.
lrnStatsalmost 5 years ago
Anyone using something other than Firefox or chrome?
评论 #23982496 未加载
评论 #23984901 未加载
评论 #23982667 未加载
potiuperalmost 5 years ago
The summary section could use work.
johnisgoodalmost 5 years ago
&gt; Firefox 79.0 released with master password renamed to primary password<p>Jeez...
robotmayalmost 5 years ago
Have they reverted the godawful address bar change yet?
grezqlalmost 5 years ago
Firefox, current, is really slow on video rendering. Youtube on 1080p kinda freezes at times. Same video works perfectly in Chrome<p>Im on Win10, this happenened on win8.1 aswell.
评论 #23977778 未加载
评论 #23978132 未加载
The_rationalistalmost 5 years ago
meanwhile chromium has async stack traces since 2017 <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.google.com&#x2F;web&#x2F;updates&#x2F;2017&#x2F;05&#x2F;devtools-release-notes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.google.com&#x2F;web&#x2F;updates&#x2F;2017&#x2F;05&#x2F;devtools-r...</a>
评论 #23978026 未加载
评论 #23979968 未加载
marcrosoftalmost 5 years ago
I’ve tried Firefox about once a year for the past five years and always immediately go back to chromium. Scrolling is always broken out of the box on all platforms I’ve tried (Linux and macOS).<p>Edit: trying again, the macOS track pad seems ok but scroll wheel behavior is different. Firefox requires 2-3 times the scrolling distance and transitions slowly to the final scroll destination. Chrome does not.<p>Edit 2: I’m almost positive it’s smooth scrolling. Some people hate it and some like it. This reddit thread sums up: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;firefox&#x2F;comments&#x2F;5zoa1t&#x2F;do_you_use_smooth_scrolling&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;firefox&#x2F;comments&#x2F;5zoa1t&#x2F;do_you_use_...</a>
评论 #23977825 未加载
评论 #23978611 未加载
评论 #23978313 未加载
评论 #23977792 未加载
评论 #23977980 未加载
评论 #23979872 未加载
评论 #23985142 未加载