I usually look at the "enemies" press and my own country's press, then subtract the difference and somewhere in there is perhaps some truth. Then I go to foreign policy/political and social/economic journal sites and search for papers on topics similar to get actual analysis and not just brief talking points.<p>For example I'll often watch the Ruptly Youtube channel but before you jump up and down screaming 'it's Russian propaganda' it is, but at the same time, all their videos are uncensored they will often take 4 hours footage of something news worthy with no pundits editing or screaming over top of it. As an example this silly story from Egypt about a robot waiter <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyuGnCZOwMo" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyuGnCZOwMo</a> notice a few things, you can hear in the background what people are saying, this is almost always drowned out by a pundit yapping on our news. You can hear the guy talking in his native language with no questionable translations. By questionable translations I mean in my country I remember a long time some Egyptian protest, and the propaganda that passes for state news in my commonwealth country had edited out the voices of the crowd claiming they were shouting something different than what they really were shouting when I looked up the same unedited footage on Ruptly. So yes, it is 'evil state propaganda' but at least you get unedited footage, can hear what people are truly saying.<p>Otherwise there are journals you can read that will often have extensive in depth papers on whatever the socio-political situation of that country is like Oxford's Foreign Policy Analysis. Here's an example, let's say some new war breaks out in Africa again. Let's say there is pressure in all our countries to deploy a peacekeeping force and there is no independent news analysis, we just have tables of pundits yelling talking points framed in local politics. How do you know if 'peacekeeping' even works? Well that's when some of these journals step in to give you some non sensationalist analysis <a href="https://academic.oup.com/fpa/article/16/3/251/5824326?searchresult=1" rel="nofollow">https://academic.oup.com/fpa/article/16/3/251/5824326?search...</a> which you would have to run through sci-hub to get access to unless you have unlimited access to these journals through university libraries or something.<p>So, tl;dr, what I usually do is my local news headlines are dominated by (event) which is always just framed in national political talking points so highly sensationalist and pushing talking points that benefit some political party. When you go looking for (event) in journals you will often find background and analysis nobody else has to help understand it, like say the political relationship between Germany and Russia and some kind of trade conflict breaks out between them. There is background for this in journals you can read yourself to see why everything is set up the way it is without being distorted by the talking heads pretending it isn't set up that way and their preferred candidate X can easily rearrange this agreement.<p>I have tried "slow news" sources, various state sources in Europe and commonwealth, commercial news, so-called 'independent' news like AP or Intercept all of it is inherently biased to frame every story in some kind of political talking points and stories that do not fit this bias are just not even reported, so you need to fill in the rest with the "enemies" news like say, a Chinese newspaper article or even Syrian or Iranian, or Venezuelan, or whatever 'enemy' news. Sometimes they have different perspectives you didn't even consider and then can directly research these things yourself if you really want. To avoid this being a F/T job, which sounds like it is, I just make an afternoon of going through some Oxford journal articles (and other universities of course, to avoid the one-sided cultural problem again) and without fail whenever (event) happens in my local news I remember an article I already read about this, dig it up and lo and behold I now understand (event) better than the screaming pundits.<p>Anybody who knows of a good university, foreign policy type analysis journal I'd be interested too, like a French or Russian one to counter all the British and American one's I read just to see things that are left out.