TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ubuntu Philosophy

95 pointsby llambdaover 4 years ago

11 comments

prmphover 4 years ago
The meaning of Ubuntu all too often gets lost in vague translations such as &quot;bond of sharing&quot;, &quot;unity&quot;, and &quot;collective humanity&quot;. This is a bit unfortunate, because Ubuntu expresses an interesting and specific concept.<p>Ubuntu can literally be translated as &quot;I am what I am because of what we all are&quot;, ie., that individual meaning is bound up with collective meaning. To give some simple examples, a king is so because a kingdom with subjects exists. Were he to diminish his subjects, he diminishes himself. An elected politician draws power from the socially constructed collective rule of law and norms. We he&#x2F;she to attack these collective norms, his source of legitimate power can crumble. As software engineers, our (admittedly advantageous) socio-cultural position derives from unique place the tech industry has carved out in society. If we act in ways inimical to the sharing and openness that underpins the industry, we are attacking our own position in the long-term.<p>These examples illustrate the spirit of Ubuntu, and it is not hard to see why it implies values such as sharing, attention to collective interests, and the like. But at its core, the philosophy is something quite specific.
评论 #24265795 未加载
CraigJPerryover 4 years ago
This was front and centre of the press releases about the Linux distro at the time, it’s the only reason i know what it means :-)<p>When warty or hoary were released, Shuttleworth was mentioned on BBC news for his sponsorship efforts (although they spent as much time talking about his outer space shennanigans as they did linux). I cant remember if theres a connection between Mark Shuttleworth and Elon Musk (paypal - am i just making that up?) but they always stick in my mind together for some reason.<p>Typing all this has triggered a memory i’d forgotten - a podcast series from around this time. 4 British chaps, Jono Bacon was one of them. I can’t remember the name but it was fantastic entertainment, lots of laughter but it was a podcast about linux. Ubuntu featured heavily. They disbanded some years later.
评论 #24262002 未加载
评论 #24265706 未加载
O_H_Eover 4 years ago
For those who didn&#x27;t check the link yet, this is not about Ubuntu the linux distro, but an ideology that has its roots in mid and south Africa.<p>&gt;[Ubuntu philosophy] is often used in a more philosophical sense to mean &quot;the belief in a universal bond of sharing that connects all humanity.&quot;
评论 #24261054 未加载
djsumdogover 4 years ago
When reading Wikipedia, always check the talk page:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Talk:Ubuntu_philosophy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Talk:Ubuntu_philosophy</a><p>and always go back in time a decade:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;w&#x2F;index.php?title=Ubuntu_philosophy&amp;oldid=66847698" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;w&#x2F;index.php?title=Ubuntu_philosophy...</a>
评论 #24261761 未加载
评论 #24263153 未加载
blindmover 4 years ago
Wow TIL Nelson Mandela was used in a promotional video for Ubuntu, the Operating System we all know and love. You can watch the video here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wikipedia&#x2F;commons&#x2F;1&#x2F;17&#x2F;Experience_ubuntu.ogv" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wikipedia&#x2F;commons&#x2F;1&#x2F;17&#x2F;Experien...</a>
评论 #24264932 未加载
Kattywumpusover 4 years ago
This should be horrifying to any sane human, but we live in a time of great insanity, and much of what ought to be criticized passes by unremarked in plain sight.<p>&gt; Ubuntu asserts that society, not a transcendent being, gives human beings their humanity.<p>Let&#x27;s be clear on what we&#x27;re talking about here: <i>Your humanity.</i> Are you a human being, or aren&#x27;t you? Are you a moral entity or not?<p>In the West, we say your humanity is intrinsically, unalienably situated in your person, bestowed upon you by a higher authority even than society itself. It may at times be recognized or unrecognized by the crooked timber of human institutions, but with or without them, it exists. You are a human being even if society doesn&#x27;t want you to be, for whatever reason.<p>Compare and contrast with Ubuntu:<p>&gt; According to Michael Onyebuchi Eze, the core of ubuntu can best be summarised as follows:<p>&gt; <i>&#x27;A person is a person through other people&#x27;</i> strikes an affirmation of one’s humanity through recognition of an ‘other’ in his or her uniqueness and difference. It is a demand for a creative intersubjective formation in which the ‘other’ becomes a mirror (but only a mirror) for my subjectivity. This idealism suggests to us that <i>humanity is not embedded in my person solely as an individual; my humanity is co-substantively bestowed upon the other and me.</i><p>Again, cutting through the obstructive bafflegab:<p><i>&#x27;A person is a person through other people&#x27;</i><p><i>humanity is not embedded in my person solely as an individual</i><p>The examples given are even more grotesque.<p>&gt; When someone behaves according to custom, a Sotho-speaking person would say “ke motho,” which means &quot;he&#x2F;she is a human.&quot;<p>&gt; The aspect of this that would be exemplified by a tale told (often, in private quarters) in Nguni “kushone abantu ababili ne Shangaan,” in Sepedi “go tlhokofetje batho ba babedi le leShangane,” in English <i>(two people died and one Shangaan).</i> In each of these examples, humanity comes from conforming to or being part of the tribe.<p>In other words, three people died, but only one &quot;human&quot;. Think deeply on the implications of that.<p>Growing beyond this kind of tribal denial of humanity has always been one of the proudest achievements of the West. It&#x27;s a shame to see us sinking back into it, endorsing it, even celebrating it again. See this kind of literal dehumanization pass by without much notice at all.
评论 #24265004 未加载
评论 #24265278 未加载
setgreeover 4 years ago
FWIW, Ubuntu is a &#x27;core value&#x27; of City Year, an Americorps organization:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cityyear.org&#x2F;about&#x2F;history-values&#x2F;values&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cityyear.org&#x2F;about&#x2F;history-values&#x2F;values&#x2F;</a><p>And CY is the type of organization to trumpet its values early and often to its own participants (which I was in 2010-11).
igiturover 4 years ago
Maybe this is a good place to mention that the correct pronunciation of Ubuntu (both the philosophy and the Linux distro) is &quot;ooBOONtoo&quot;, not &quot;you-bun-too&quot;, which I often hear.<p>IPA pronunciation: ùɓúntʼù
ngcc_hkover 4 years ago
Quite a horrible philosophy. It is really totalitarian in nature. Marxism and nazi going together. Obviously it seems ok to unify and pardon. But read this. Horror. Individual can opt in but not mold like a clay. Whilst we should interact but not find ourselves in the group only. Individual is the base. Or at least some of us trying and should not be joined only pray of a group even though you label the group as humanity.<p>What if my minority group is a different kind. What is I want myself, my family and my county only. Yes we can have a country or a culture and there is an us. But that us should not forced upon me, my family or my town to conform. Or my little race my little county ... another china just too small currently but another china. That might be a link between Africa and<p>“ &quot;Ubuntu&quot; as political philosophy encourages community equality, propagating the distribution of wealth. This socialisation is a vestige of agrarian peoples as a hedge against the crop failures of individuals. Socialisation presupposes a community population with which individuals empathise and concomitantly, have a vested interest in its collective prosperity. Urbanisation and the aggregation of people into an abstract and bureaucratic state undermines this empathy. African Intellectual historians like Michael Onyebuchi Eze have argued however that this ideal of &quot;collective responsibility&quot; must not be understood as absolute in which the community&#x27;s good is prior to the individual&#x27;s good. On this view, ubuntu it is argued, is a communitarian philosophy that is widely differentiated from the Western notion of communitarian socialism. In fact, ubuntu induces an ideal of shared human subjectivity that promotes a community&#x27;s good through an unconditional recognition and appreciation of individual uniqueness and difference.[12] Audrey Tang has suggested that Ubuntu &quot;implies that everyone has different skills and strengths; people are not isolated, and through mutual support they can help each other to complete themselves.&quot;[13]<p>&quot;Redemption&quot; relates to how people deal with errant, deviant, and dissident members of the community. The belief is that man is born formless like a lump of clay. It is up to the community, as a whole, to use the fire of experience and the wheel of social control to mould him into a pot that may contribute to society. Any imperfections should be borne by the community and the community should always seek to redeem man. ...”
op03over 4 years ago
more grist - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;riskmagazine.nl&#x2F;article&#x2F;2018-09-30-ubuntu-vague-philosophy-or-valuable-concept" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;riskmagazine.nl&#x2F;article&#x2F;2018-09-30-ubuntu-vague-phil...</a>
omginternetsover 4 years ago
&gt;Ubuntu can literally be translated as &quot;I am what I am because of what we all are&quot;, ie., that individual meaning is bound up with collective meaning.<p>In philosophical terms, Gilbert Ryle would argue that &quot;Self&quot; and &quot;Other&quot; are in the same <i>category</i>, just as up&#x2F;down, anxiety&#x2F;contentment, life&#x2F;death, black&#x2F;white are are different instances of the same stuff.<p>If you&#x27;re a zen Buddhist (or a fan of Alan Watts), you&#x27;re already familiar with this idea as well. Self can only be understood in opposition to non-self, life in opposition to death, light in opposition to dark, etc.<p>A corollary: there isn&#x27;t really an ontological difference between self and other (or life and death for that matter).<p>Historical Note &#x2F; Tangent: Ryle uses the notion of category to do away with Cartesian dualism. It is very much the reason the mind&#x2F;body problem is largely considered to be a pseudoproblem these days: mind and body, by virtue of the fact that they are defined in opposition to one another, are ontologically the same stuff -- they&#x27;re in the same category.
评论 #24262389 未加载