TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ubuntu Unity usability testing results and analysis

249 pointsby keyistabout 14 years ago

22 comments

andykingabout 14 years ago
I work for a small non-profit radio station where we've got a couple of Ubuntu boxes (running 10.10, or whatever the latest version with standard GNOME 2 is). I've only done it because we recently expanded our volunteer base and didn't have XP licences to cover computers for every desk!<p>I've actually been really surprised at how well the volunteers have taken to using the machines, and how some even seem to prefer them to the tried-and-tested XP installation we've got on other computers in the building.<p>It helped that we were already using Chrome, Thunderbird and OpenOffice as our standard applications throughout the station - so when I installed the machines, I just stuck big, bold icons for each one on the desktop to make it obvious what to do. Audacity was a new one (we're using Adobe Audition on other machines) but people took to it reasonably well.<p>Comments I've received have been along the lines of <i>"There's a lot less shit on the desktop than on those other [XP] computers," "It's easier to find what you're doing, and it seems a bit faster too,"</i> and so on. For some reason, our XP machines accumulate junk on the desktop, whereas the Ubuntu boxes stay relatively clean!<p>It works for a lot of our older, less experienced members who find it difficult to find, say, the Thunderbird icon among a pile of old documents and folders on the Windows desktop, or get confused when Start -&#62; Email opens up an empty install of Outlook Express for some reason. It often feels like I spend more time helping people out when something's disappeared, they can't print, they can't find something on a Windows box than actually doing my job, so the Ubuntu machines have been a boost - they seem to just keep trooping on.<p>Of course, our users are simply booting the machine and opening up some standard applications that also run on Windows, and not going in and changing settings, or anything - I suspect that's where it would fall down in usability.<p>However, I've tried out recent pre-releases of Unity and GNOME 3 and found them pretty confusing, and I expect a lot of the users who've made positive comments to me about Ubuntu at work would too. It seems like a step backwards to me, with too many unclear mysterious icons, and bits of the UI whizzing on and off the screen while I try to work - and I'm sticking with the LTS at home, and not updating the work machines, either.
评论 #2450061 未加载
btmorexabout 14 years ago
Overall, pretty interesting. A lot of those are definitely usability bugs. I wish someone would do a comparison between mac os x, windows, ubuntu with the same tasks to see how they stacked up against each other.<p>However:<p><i>5/11 participants (P2, P3, P5, P9, P10, P11) crashed Unity during their hour of testing. And towards the end of her test, P11 opened a zombie quicklist that stayed on top of everything and didn't respond to clicks.</i><p>This ubuntu release is shaping up to be pulseaudio 2.0. I know everyone will just say "use LTS", but somehow debian testing manages to be both more up to date and more stable than normal ubuntu releases. I'm not sure why canonical can't at least match that.
评论 #2449461 未加载
quadhomeabout 14 years ago
Some of these are humbling. They reinforce how disconnected I-- a programmer-- am from the average person.<p>&#62; P1 recovered amazingly well after trying to save "Letter to Mr Smith 08/04/11", and getting the vile response "Error stating file '/home/ubuntu/Documents/Letter to Mr Smith 08/04': No such file or directory"<p>That's something I'd never consider, what with various directory separators baked into my subconscious.
评论 #2450809 未加载
评论 #2449521 未加载
评论 #2449833 未加载
评论 #2449845 未加载
dkarlabout 14 years ago
<i>Nobody understood Ubuntu One.</i> <i>4/11 people (P7, P9, P11, P12) thought the Me menu icon might be a close button</i><p>With silly corporate-ad-campaign-flavored names like "One" and "Me" it's no wonder.
评论 #2450045 未加载
Legionabout 14 years ago
&#62; <i>P7 and P11 thought that "LibreOffice Calc" was a calculator</i><p>"Calc" is just not a smart name for a spreadsheet application.<p>&#62; <i>and P7 and P9 thought Ubuntu Software Center was the Recycle Bin.</i><p>I understand that, because that <i>is</i> what the icon looks like.
评论 #2449495 未加载
评论 #2449755 未加载
评论 #2450315 未加载
vessenesabout 14 years ago
This was my favorite -- DESIGNERS, THIS IS WHAT AD BLINDNESS LOOKS LIKE IN AN APP: Don't design stuff like this in, people don't notice it anymore.<p>" Only 2/6 noticed an XChat Gnome notification, despite (1) a notification bubble appearing, (2) the Ubuntu button going blue, (3) the messaging menu envelope going blue, and (4) an emblem appearing on XChat Gnome's launcher. "
评论 #2450364 未加载
评论 #2449531 未加载
divtxtabout 14 years ago
How far we've come!<p>I remember about 10 years ago, with the rise of XP and the advent of OS X, expecting Linux desktop to fall ever further behind on a usable &#38; full-featured desktop.<p>Here we are discussing the usability tests of big UI innovations.<p>I'd like to thank everyone who got us here! (<i>cough</i> including Redmond <i>cough</i>)
akavlieabout 14 years ago
I run with a laptop (display on, but rarely used) connected to an external monitor. Linux assumes the laptop is the default, and changing the external to primary is next to impossible.<p>Unity puts everything important on the laptop display in this configuration. That alone is a deal breaker for me.<p>Note that Ubuntu Classic works perfectly in this setup. My panels go to the external monitor when it's plugged in, and move back to the laptop immediately when it's unplugged.<p>Unity (as it's currently designed) would pose some serious issues in a dual-display setup even if I could move it to the external monitor. As the launcher is stuck on the left, I'd be constantly overshooting it (laptop display is to the left).
评论 #2449813 未加载
评论 #2449532 未加载
ruberglyabout 14 years ago
I wonder: 11 people seems like a rather small sample size; does Canonical typically do any testing with larger samples?<p>I'm surprised that only 5/10 people tried to open another Firefox window by clicking the launcher icon. Personally, I think clicking the launcher icon not opening a new window is silly, but that's because I'm used to Windows 7 and not OSX.
评论 #2449459 未加载
评论 #2450371 未加载
评论 #2450447 未加载
hasenjabout 14 years ago
Here's what I think should happen before final release:<p>- Make the launcher always on by default<p>- Remove the recycle bin icon (I really don't get the point of it)<p>- Remove the applications icon (redundant with the Ubuntu button). Perhaps add a "System" lense view instead (system settings and all that).<p>- Add an "expose" icon (super-w). And perhaps hide the workspaces icon by default.
评论 #2450176 未加载
ambiguityabout 14 years ago
It would have been nice to have a test group that used the classic Gnome 2 desktop. This would give the Unity scores a bit more context.
评论 #2449458 未加载
评论 #2449407 未加载
评论 #2450598 未加载
calpatersonabout 14 years ago
It's a shame they're doing this at so late a stage. I understand that 11.04 is now in feature freeze and Unity will be released as is
评论 #2450035 未加载
评论 #2452548 未加载
acabalabout 14 years ago
If almost 50% of the users managed to crash the GUI with routine tasks <i>in the span of a single hour</i>, that's a sure sign that it isn't ready for prime-time yet, regardless of what anybody's opinions on features or functionality are.<p>I personally think this is almost definitely going to end up as another Pulseaudo-style debacle that'll jade even more Ubuntu users. This kind of stuff is exactly why I never recommend Linux to friends, even though I personally use it on my day-to-day machine: because it's just not (crashwise) stable enough for Grandma, and Shuttleworth has a very bad habit of making his end-users his beta-testers. Grandma isn't going to loyally log in to Launchpad, report a bug and reboot; she's going to complain to me, and then I'm going to reinstall Windows 7, which for all its faults at least doesn't crash once every two hours.
评论 #2452785 未加载
评论 #2453145 未加载
steevdaveabout 14 years ago
I work with Ubuntu for work ( we make ARM devices ) so every so often I have to run Natty to test if it is usable yet. If you have a "decent" <i>OpenGL</i> graphics card, then depending on when you install it may or may not work. I currently have an issue with working with the dock or launcher or whatever name they are calling it. Right clicks are being passed through to the desktop so I can't remove or add anything to it.<p>If you don't have an OpenGL based video card ( no ARM machine does, they all use a subset of OpenGL called OpenGL ES ) then upon logging in, you get a long dialog explaining that you need to logout and choose classic desktop. And it has an exit button. When you click said exit button, after a bit it loads the classic desktop, however the xsettings manager doesn't get started (or it might, just depends on if it feels like running it seems) and gnome becomes very ugly.<p>There is no mention of Unity-2D which is a version that is QT based. And it suffers from the same issues, xsettings may or may not launch and then you have a ton of dialogs about apps crashing in the background ( this is with either Gnome "classic" or with Unity-2D ).<p>Ubuntu made great strides in making the Linux desktop accessible for everyone, but this latest release shows just how much further they need to go.<p>Keep in mind that at the time the decision to write and use Unity was made, the Gnome 3 desktop was in an absolute mess. A lot of work has happened since then and it would be even better if Mark Shuttleworth could swallow his pride and just scrap the Unity project and work with upstream like before.<p>I mention the ARM bit at the beginning of my statement if only out of frustration due to the fact that our company provided Ubuntu developers with over 50 machines that are in either a desktop configuration or netbook yet it still doesn't run anywhere close to where it should on them.
评论 #2455408 未加载
pbhjpbhjabout 14 years ago
What this story is missing is a couple of screenshots from the particular implementation used.<p>Anyone?
评论 #2453652 未加载
PetrolManabout 14 years ago
I installed 11.04 and when I was first setting everything up (because the video drivers weren't installed yet) I played around with Gnome and actually ended up with a setup that looked a lot like Unity. The difference was I had a lot more control over the panels which I really liked.<p>Then, once the drivers were in place, I switched to Unity and was initially really wowed by the way it looked. I really like the idea behind the side menu but right now it is a bit finicky. Sometimes it will partially open when I move my mouse to the edge and other times it works just fine. I absolutely hate the launcher menu (might not be the right term - app drawer or whatever else might be more fitting) simply because it makes it a chore to find applications.<p>I've also found Unity relatively unstable. I've had it simply lock up and I haven't found a way to get around it other than resetting my computer.<p>Even stuff like the way moving a window to the edge of the screen and it taking up a portion works seems inconsistent. I can sometimes get 1/3, sometimes 1/2 and sometimes 2/3 but I honestly haven't spent enough time trying to figure out why it works in different ways. Nor do I feel I really should have to... UI should be relatively intuitive.<p>Anyway, I think Unity is promising but it is really rough right now... really rough.
mitkoabout 14 years ago
On the other hand this testing doesn't include <i>any</i> other ubuntu user. Of course you'll have some learnability gap. I see also a lot of windows people having trouble to figure out in their first few hours in OS X. While Unity definitely needs some polish, it already makes it more <i>efficient</i> to manage my desktop experience on my netbook running Ubuntu. The guys at Cannonical are trying to do major innovation and provide some consistency with the old UI.
steevdaveabout 14 years ago
Where is P6? Was there one and their comments were so bad that they didn't add it to the list? Numbers missing in a list like that really bug me. It also causes me to wonder why it never comes up. I haven't read the thread since a lot earlier and being as I know a few people around the Ubuntu camp I asked them and no one seemed to have any idea why P6 was not on the list.
tcarnellabout 14 years ago
Great post! I started using Ubuntu Unity on my netbook, however, I had first installed Ubuntu Desktop and added Unity later so I can switch between them at loging time.<p>I think that Unity is great! Really encapsulates the spirit of a netbook - a small, versatile and fun communications device. I have an asus 1005pe - which I can also highly recommend.
nrbafnaabout 14 years ago
I am really surprised one thing didn't come up. It's about the super+(?) shortcut.<p>If you press them very quickly, say 'super+D', then it will take to desktop and open dash as well. To be safe, you have press 'super', wait till numbers appear on the icons in launcher and then press 'D'
评论 #2449654 未加载
评论 #2452870 未加载
评论 #2449929 未加载
dhruvbirdabout 14 years ago
wow! this is how usability tests should really be done! :-)
omouseabout 14 years ago
Needs more participants who aren't students or teachers heh. Interesting results though.