TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Inequality: The 1% solution

24 pointsby ecounysisabout 14 years ago

2 comments

ataggartabout 14 years ago
Lest the Stiglitz bandwagon go wholly unchallenged, here's a great reply by Russ Roberts:<p><a href="http://cafehayek.com/2011/04/theres-no-their-there.html" rel="nofollow">http://cafehayek.com/2011/04/theres-no-their-there.html</a><p>Since the link to the source of the (preconception shattering) intergenerational income graph he references is borked, here is a correct one:<p><a href="http://www.economicmobility.org/assets/pdfs/PEW_EMP_GETTING_AHEAD_FULL.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.economicmobility.org/assets/pdfs/PEW_EMP_GETTING_...</a>
lionheartedabout 14 years ago
&#62; I think this [Reagan-era] ideology is bad: bad for the economy, bad for society...<p>I think Regan is popularly overrated in a lot of areas, but if you're looking to analyze the impact his policies had on the economy, you have to note two important points:<p>1. Total federal tax income <i>rose</i> after the Reagan-era tax cuts. There's plenty of potential reasons why, but you've got to give serious thought to the idea that we were at an inoptimum point in the Laffer Curve before that:<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve</a><p>2. It's absolutely a fact that as people get wealthier, their spending shifts from consumption to investment. So it's pretty straightforward to see that larger fortunes <i>without falling tax yields</i> means more funds for investment.<p>Even if you don't like Reagan, you've got to give serious thought to the idea that the Reagan-era cuts played a significant part in the rapid growth of the technology sector that's come to fruition the last 20 years. That's created one of the largest increases in wealth for everyone in the United States in history.<p>But anyways, ex-libertarian here. I'd be in favor of more government spending in infrastructure and sciences. I think Reagan's domestic policy is overrated. But you've got to give some serious thought to the idea that the tax cuts led to a lot of the economic growth of the last 20 years - higher tax yields and higher private wealth leading to higher investment is really good mix for economic growth.
评论 #2455674 未加载
评论 #2455631 未加载
评论 #2455705 未加载