TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Benchmarking Firefox 83 Nightly with “Warp” Against Google Chrome on Linux

33 pointsby electricantover 4 years ago

4 comments

frankjrover 4 years ago
I don&#x27;t think benchmarking a Nightly release is valuable. The code literally changes every day, things get slower only to get faster a few days later (or vice versa). For example, the article mentions a regression in the JetStream 2.0 benchmark. There&#x27;s a ticket about this that was fixed just a few hours ago [0]. There are other performance related tickets currently open (or recently closed) [1] that should make the benchmark&#x27;s results no longer accurate.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=1667864" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=1667864</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=1613592" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=1613592</a> (look at the top for &quot;Depends on&quot; tickets)
throwaway77384over 4 years ago
&quot;Google Chrome is still delivering the leading performance on Linux.&quot;<p>Yup, same here. I use FF for everything, but occasionally have to use Chrome for something. Whenever I do, the performance difference is noticeable. But I ignore it, because I use FF out of principle.<p>These new JIT speed-ups paired with the potential for properly hardware accelerated video on Linux make me hopeful for future discussions with people who will (unfortunately, so far, rightfully) claim &quot;but Chrome is faster&quot;, which you can&#x27;t argue against....
bscphilover 4 years ago
Wow. As a non-expert about any of this technology, I must say that these comparisons are surprising. Maybe even too surprising. I wonder if maybe this could be the result of Firefox being built with different options for the nightly build than the release build. That might help explain the difference.<p>Then again, if I&#x27;m not mistaken I recall some messaging from Mozilla about Warp improving render time of heavy webapps without really helping the objective benchmarks. With such a consistent set of results it&#x27;s hard to see how that could be the case (unless the benchmarks are once again behind the times), but I&#x27;m willing to give the benefit of the doubt on this. The worst case is, if it proves to be a regression, it&#x27;ll probably get reverted. And Firefox as-is is already fast enough for my needs.
评论 #24648832 未加载
skaviover 4 years ago
Has any decent benchmarking been done on the recently released Safari 14? Apple was promising some fairly significant performance improvements.<p>I ran Speedometer 2.0 before and after the iOS 14 update and saw the score increase from 158 to 168. Unfortunately, I did not think to do the same for the macOS update.