TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Netflix is creating a problem by cancelling TV shows too soon

444 pointsby arberavdullahuover 4 years ago

98 comments

sequoiaover 4 years ago
Plenty of shows can be good with just one or two seasons, and more is worse. Freaks &amp; Geeks: 1 season, amazing. Ditto UK The Office. Fleabag: 2 short seasons, amazing. The OA: AMAZING first season with a complete coherent ending, then they had to make a bizarre, scattershot second season. Ditto Killing Eve (how many damn times can she get killed lol). Downton Abbey: PLANNED for 3 seasons (pre, during, &amp; post wwI) but it was so popular they just rambled on for ages until it looked like the scripts were being pulled directly from tumblr (&quot;beloved character came back from america! for a wedding episode! plus: PUPPIES!!&quot; literally).<p>So I don&#x27;t totally get the &quot;cancelled too soon&quot; argument. The OA should have not run to even 2 seasons.<p>There&#x27;s a trend of not producing art or even something original, but producing &quot;content.&quot; For example someone asked me if The Mandalorian is good. &quot;It&#x27;s star wars Content&quot; I replied. &quot;If you like star wars, and want Content, you&#x27;ll like it.&quot; Is the plot novel? Is it original or compelling? No, but boy it&#x27;s fun to see yoda puppet and more Content from the SW universe you&#x27;ve come to know and love!<p>A lot of these series may have run their creative course &amp; while megafans want more &quot;Content&quot; it&#x27;s the same thing as something being cancelled too soon, and most people aren&#x27;t megafans.
评论 #24780407 未加载
评论 #24781502 未加载
评论 #24779753 未加载
评论 #24780838 未加载
评论 #24783184 未加载
评论 #24781430 未加载
评论 #24780326 未加载
评论 #24780019 未加载
评论 #24779610 未加载
评论 #24781629 未加载
评论 #24779991 未加载
评论 #24781434 未加载
评论 #24781335 未加载
评论 #24788281 未加载
评论 #24782751 未加载
评论 #24779959 未加载
评论 #24782178 未加载
评论 #24781701 未加载
评论 #24782831 未加载
评论 #24779649 未加载
andybakover 4 years ago
Just like with the resentment over Google shuttering things - this is a classic case of ignorning second order effects.<p>Yes - not enough people are watching to justify the cost.<p>But cancellation has a whole raft of hidden costs:<p>1. Reluctance of viewers to invest time in the next thing that comes along<p>2. Users defecting to rivals out of anger<p>3. A negative effect among those demographics that tend to influence others the most<p>4. Loss of creative talent - edgy directors and actors won&#x27;t want to risk your platform<p>I&#x27;m sure there are more but they all circle around a common theme. Loss of trust.
评论 #24776598 未加载
评论 #24776232 未加载
评论 #24780837 未加载
评论 #24778969 未加载
评论 #24776520 未加载
netcanover 4 years ago
I&#x27;ve been wondering about the &quot;economics&quot; of long running serials for a while.<p>If you have a new series, all potential viewers are potential viewers. If you have a season 3, the only potential viewers are season 2 watchers. A genuinely huge show like breaking bad or GOT might break this dynamic, as people eventually catch up on old seasons and make the pool bigger. In normal circumstances though, new seasons have limited potential. They also have no upside. Season 4 is not going to be a blockbuster if 1-3 were average.<p>Maybe it makes sense to shoot single seasons, with multiple seasons being a rare circumstance thing. Just tell a story that fits in 6-12 hours.<p>Seems like it would be good for creativity, the opposite of cinema&#x27;s recycling problem. Who says new shows are worse than new seasons. It even seems like a bolder choice to me. No guaranteed audience, but unlimited audience.
评论 #24780804 未加载
评论 #24775984 未加载
评论 #24776426 未加载
评论 #24775954 未加载
评论 #24776154 未加载
评论 #24782482 未加载
评论 #24784563 未加载
评论 #24775974 未加载
评论 #24775948 未加载
评论 #24776180 未加载
评论 #24776011 未加载
评论 #24778282 未加载
评论 #24779126 未加载
评论 #24775952 未加载
评论 #24775887 未加载
评论 #24781395 未加载
rubyn00bieover 4 years ago
Netflix is sowing its own demise through shitty content and the worst fucking content discovery system ever.<p>First Netflix UI is anti-consumer and regularly hides things or makes them difficult&#x2F;impossible to find. Worst algorithm driven interface after Amazon. It’s truly awful for discovery as you can’t ever be sure what you’re seeing is all that’s available. I fucking hate it.<p>This wouldn’t be such a problem if they didn’t grade shows success on their initial views... but they do. So things are hard to discover so I don’t watch them immediately or can’t find them again if I wait a week or two.<p>I have stopped watching any and all Netflix originals because they will be judiciously cancelled save animated titles because it seems cheap enough for them to produce or something like the Witcher where they hopefully can’t fuck it up so badly it gets canceled before a decent run.<p>Then again I wait and save the last few episodes shows I really like instead of binging them but that only hurts them more and hastens their cancellations. So then I don’t watch them, this too hastens their cancellations.<p>So when watching Netflix shows you have two options:<p>1.) Is the show epically well funded AND staring big name actors from cinema? Okay, maybe won’t be canceled. E.g. the Witcher.<p>2.) Is the show so cheap to make they’ll do it just because they need to add content? E.g. Castlevania<p>IMHO, Netflix is willfully creating the rope from which it will hang itself.
评论 #24777480 未加载
racl101over 4 years ago
Netflix is becoming a graveyard of junk shows.<p>This is why, for the most part, I don&#x27;t start watching streaming service exclusives until their sophomore season is complete and they haven&#x27;t been cancelled.<p>Of course there are few exceptions like Cobra Kai or The Mandalorian where it&#x27;s evident that the concept is pretty solid and that the show is bonafide hit from the first 10 minutes.<p>But yeah, like for every Netflix hit there&#x27;s like 10 or more less than promising shows.<p>It&#x27;s really becoming a graveyard. And when you realize that you can&#x27;t even give them a shot because you know that even if they&#x27;re decent there won&#x27;t be any resolution or closure in the form of a series ending then it makes you not wanna even start to watch them.<p>Seriously, they should fund less shows but really make sure they&#x27;re quality shows. They should act like HBO in short.
评论 #24776712 未加载
评论 #24776599 未加载
评论 #24780971 未加载
评论 #24778118 未加载
bashtoniover 4 years ago
That&#x27;s a very American perspective. In the UK a series is usually only 6 episodes and few shows last more than two or three series.<p>Compare the original UK version of the Office and its American facsimile and I think you&#x27;ll see it&#x27;s much better to go out on a high rather than drag on endlessly. If the Simpsons had ended after a couple of seasons it would have been one of the best shows ever, instead the brain dead drivel they churn out for it now just continually diminishes its early greatness.
评论 #24774728 未加载
评论 #24775868 未加载
评论 #24774713 未加载
评论 #24775799 未加载
评论 #24775638 未加载
评论 #24775724 未加载
评论 #24781994 未加载
评论 #24775779 未加载
评论 #24775610 未加载
评论 #24776689 未加载
评论 #24774756 未加载
评论 #24775914 未加载
评论 #24776934 未加载
评论 #24776293 未加载
crazygringoover 4 years ago
This is a classic dilemma which doesn&#x27;t have any clear answer.<p>Individually, I assume Netflix has the data to back up the fact that each show <i>should</i> have been cancelled -- that no matter how critically acclaimed or how devoted the fanbase, the shows simply didn&#x27;t have <i>enough</i> fanbase to justify the cost.<p>But then in aggregate, it adds up to an unintended narrative that could prove to be harmful to the bottom line: that Netflix cancels shows. So people stop watching the first season to see if a show survives into a third... stop recommending Netflix... and it&#x27;s harmful to the bottom line.<p>The thing is, there&#x27;s no obvious answer. If Netflix didn&#x27;t cancel any of these shows, it would go out of business and&#x2F;or not have the money to fund future (hopefully successful) ones. It&#x27;s the same way with Googling canceling products: it&#x27;s ridiculous and money-losing to keep around every failed product, but individually they add up to a reputation.<p>It&#x27;s a classic damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don&#x27;t. People <i>love</i> it when companies experiment and launch lots of new products&#x2F;shows -- that&#x27;s where innovation comes from. But then they <i>hate</i> it when the unsuccessful ones get cancelled, because <i>every</i> product&#x2F;show has <i>some</i> set of users&#x2F;viewers who love it.<p>But I see no solution, except for companies to continue cancelling unprofitable things, and people to continue complaining about it.
评论 #24781037 未加载
评论 #24779539 未加载
评论 #24782615 未加载
jedbergover 4 years ago
Netflix is not very good at seeing things that don&#x27;t show up in the data. If it can&#x27;t be A&#x2F;B tested, they are fairly blind to it.<p>There is no good way to A&#x2F;B test how cancellations affect signups. You can&#x27;t release new seasons of a show to just some customers in a region. And if you only release new seasons in some regions, there is no way to know if the effect was because of local cultural reasons.<p>Until there is a large movement of people who make a lot of noise about not signing up for Netflix specifically because of their reputation for cancellation, this probably won&#x27;t change.<p>And until then, ironically, this reputation will only make the problem worse. People will not watch a new show until they know it isn&#x27;t cancelled, leading to even more cancellations because of low viewership.
评论 #24781018 未加载
评论 #24778450 未加载
mattlondonover 4 years ago
Personal opinion from a brit:<p><i>US series are too long.</i><p>It is a psychological thing I guess - sitting down and perusing netflix, see something you like but then realise it is 24 hour-long episodes just in the first season. It is a turn off - I can&#x27;t commit upfront to that amount of time to something entirely unknown to me.<p>Especially since in a lot of series I&#x27;ve watched, they often lose their way and 99 times out 100 the last 2 or 3 seasons inevitably decay into a &quot;will-they-wont-they&quot; thing about two characters falling in love or whatever, and the rest of the cast and whatever made the series good originally is mostly ignored. Then they&#x27;re cancelled. So e.g. Lost, US Office, that 70s show and many more all went on <i>way</i> too long while dancing around with romance between two characters etc etc while ignoring what made the first season or two appealing.<p>Don&#x27;t get me wrong, I love binge watching something good and I am disappointed when I run out of episodes or whatever, but it is good for people to know when to end a show and leave people with good memories, rather than turning it into a death march where people are relieved to just have finished the show.<p>Give me 8 to 10 <i>good</i> episodes per season, and please don&#x27;t string it out for 7, 8, 9 seasons when there is only enough ideas for 2 or maybe rarely 3 seasons&#x27;s worth of episodes.
评论 #24776547 未加载
评论 #24777183 未加载
评论 #24776471 未加载
评论 #24776334 未加载
评论 #24776274 未加载
评论 #24777495 未加载
评论 #24777321 未加载
评论 #24776216 未加载
评论 #24776519 未加载
评论 #24776787 未加载
评论 #24776639 未加载
评论 #24776816 未加载
评论 #24778103 未加载
评论 #24776736 未加载
评论 #24779063 未加载
评论 #24777111 未加载
评论 #24778892 未加载
评论 #24776863 未加载
评论 #24777358 未加载
评论 #24778325 未加载
评论 #24780026 未加载
评论 #24776685 未加载
评论 #24776747 未加载
评论 #24777049 未加载
评论 #24776234 未加载
评论 #24777849 未加载
评论 #24776616 未加载
评论 #24776318 未加载
评论 #24778791 未加载
评论 #24776807 未加载
评论 #24776618 未加载
评论 #24776681 未加载
评论 #24778850 未加载
评论 #24776876 未加载
评论 #24776765 未加载
评论 #24778600 未加载
评论 #24777160 未加载
评论 #24777014 未加载
评论 #24778197 未加载
评论 #24781306 未加载
评论 #24778276 未加载
评论 #24776383 未加载
评论 #24776311 未加载
mszczover 4 years ago
I&#x27;m afraid that this behaviour in general, not just related to Netflix, is doing the industry much harm.<p>My own experience is that recently I just don&#x27;t want to get into new shows, at all. The story goes - I start to watch a show, I grow to like it, get all emotionally invested, the show gets cancelled halfway and I&#x27;m left out in the cold, dick in my hand, no satisfying end to a story arc, nothing. Most recent example is Counterpart which was (imo) phenomenal but got the axe after two seasons.<p>I&#x27;m not expecting the shows to run in perpetuity, just for them to run their course, tell their story. Great shows aren&#x27;t great because they last a long time.
评论 #24776152 未加载
pgroteover 4 years ago
When Netflix comes out with a new show I won&#x27;t watch it until it gets into a third season. Learned early on the investment of time doesn&#x27;t pay off as they quickly pull the shows.<p>Unsure what the future holds for netflix as more and more IP silos are popping up and eventually they&#x27;ll have to resort to their own programming in the USA to carry the load. Will that be enough versus other services having vast libraries?
评论 #24776202 未加载
评论 #24776056 未加载
shannifinover 4 years ago
I guess it looks like a problem because they can afford to throw more spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks than a traditional network, the result being more fallen spaghetti...<p>However, it is possible they&#x27;re missing out on potential viewership when they cancel too early based only on one season metrics... I rarely watch a show that&#x27;s only been on for one season because I&#x27;m that much more likely to not get story closure. Not sure how common that is, but how many people are watching shows that were cancelled before getting story closure? And how many might watch the back catalog otherwise? I guess not enough to be worth the investment.<p>On a side note, I do wish more seasons (streaming or not) would actually come to a real stopping point instead of just ending on a cliffhanger and hoping to be renewed.
评论 #24774736 未加载
评论 #24774667 未加载
评论 #24774646 未加载
op03over 4 years ago
Content has become like the toothpaste aisle - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.metropolismag.com&#x2F;uncategorized&#x2F;the-toothpaste-aisle&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.metropolismag.com&#x2F;uncategorized&#x2F;the-toothpaste-a...</a><p>And the toothpaste aisle wars, as the link explains well, usually end with consolidation around 2 players.<p>Given that Netflix has racked up quite a bit of debt to dominate the aisle, and now serious cash rich competitors like Disney, Apple (and lets throw in Amazon) enter the scene, does it really matters what moves Netflix makes? Is Netflix story done? Do Disney and Amazon end up dominating the aisle in a couple years?<p>But this story feels slightly different than the tooth paste story. There is that scene in GoT where the knight stands protecting a big secret. Challengers arrive. The knight knows this is going to be a fight to the death, as the secret is that important. And he says, &quot;Now it begins&quot;.<p>And the challenger replies &quot;No now it ends&quot;.<p>What matters is neither the knight or the challenger but the secret.
评论 #24774843 未加载
评论 #24776110 未加载
klmadfejnoover 4 years ago
I don&#x27;t agree with the article&#x27;s premise at all. I think it&#x27;s very rare that shows get better with age. Almost all shows get significantly worse. It cites Game of Thrones as something that got better. Really? Game of Thrones got frustratingly stupid in later seasons. The first few were far superior and the author&#x27;s comment seems to be around the difficulty of shooting the pilot which is a tangential issue altogether.<p>I haven&#x27;t seen many of these cancelled titles. I do recall some complaints around Altered Carbon being killed this year. If that&#x27;s representative, I&#x27;m going to guess that a lot of these shows are just bad...
评论 #24775884 未加载
评论 #24775956 未加载
评论 #24775889 未加载
legerdemainover 4 years ago
This is a bit of a left-field comment, but... don&#x27;t episodic TV shows have a lot of the same downsides as SaaS solutions? You want indefinite entertainment that you&#x27;ll be happy with season after season after season, but the cost is an eternity of risk that the network will cancel the show and you&#x27;ll never find out how it ends.<p>The difference is that I want Photoshop to run forever, but I&#x27;m not as sure I want Walter White to get an exotic new cancer every twelve months.<p>I don&#x27;t watch shows on my own. I know they satisfy the urge to turn on the TV and just have something on, and I think that urge is mind-rotting. If I have to watch something, why not a movie? If I don&#x27;t have the energy to pay attention for 90 minutes, <i>why idly kill time watching anything at all?</i><p>Or what about short films? That&#x27;s a whole neglected format. They have Oscars and a dedicated video network for them.
评论 #24775772 未加载
评论 #24776096 未加载
评论 #24775619 未加载
musicaleover 4 years ago
Isn&#x27;t canceling your favorite show what TV networks always do? ;-p<p>I agree that it discourages you from investing time in a show that is likely to be canceled before it finishes any of its story arcs.<p>It may be more of an issue now that many shows can easily be watched sequentially from episode one independent of the broadcast or release schedule.
评论 #24774659 未加载
评论 #24775642 未加载
zmk_over 4 years ago
At some point Netflix will have to stop thinking about how to get &#x27;new subscribers&#x27; and focus on how to &#x27;keep current subscribers&#x27;. It&#x27;s all great if you can recapture the interest of burnt customers with new flashy shows, but how many times can you do that before they stop Netflix subscription and go to Disney or HBO instead?
评论 #24775811 未加载
willchangover 4 years ago
There&#x27;s a good chance Netflix is behaving rationally.<p>Shows are like startups. The payoff is a very skewed distribution, i.e. median and mean are vastly different. After one season, I&#x27;d argue you have a pretty good estimate of the earning potential for a show. Maybe you&#x27;re even off by a factor of two or three, but since the goal is to find a show with 10x or 100x the viewership, you&#x27;re better off canceling a show with median success.<p>Actually it&#x27;s probably a lot easier to predict the payoff for a show after one year, than for a startup. Startups can take multiple years to find product-market fit; shows rarely pivot dramatically.<p>[Update: I got the facts wrong with the following example, as someone nicely pointed out below! I think the general principle still stands.] Tuca &amp; Bertie, for example, was canceled after one season, but the same people went on to make Bojack Horseman, which was a much bigger hit. Bojack would not have happened if Tuca were renewed, and Tuca would never have gotten as popular as Bojack.
评论 #24780022 未加载
grenoireover 4 years ago
Isn&#x27;t Netflix effectively doing VC, but for TV shows? They seem to be shotgunning money around to people who want to make shows, and if the RoI is not at an arbitrary threshold, they stop feeding money.<p>Seems like it generates horrible perverse incentives on what kind of (generic) content is created, though.
评论 #24774924 未加载
评论 #24774538 未加载
JackFrover 4 years ago
TFA takes as its hypothesis that Netfix don&#x27;t know what their doing, that is they are somehow missing out on growing or retaining their audience by cancelling shows after one or two seasons.<p>Obviously Netflix isn&#x27;t going to act against their own interest, so they must believe the marginal cost of producing new seasons must be greater than the marginal revenue attributable to these new seasons.<p>What makes Netflix (and all streamers) different than the traditional networks is that their viewership data is orders of magnitude better. They know who watches, how quickly, where, when, which series are abandoned by viewers, which episodes are abandoned by viewers, how series X performed with people who binged series Y.<p>I imagine they aren&#x27;t just saying that series X didn&#x27;t have a big enough audience, they are figuring based on their machine learning models, series X could not build a large enough audience to justify the production costs.<p>That the art suffers for the bottom line, while tragic, is nothing new.
评论 #24777508 未加载
评论 #24776889 未加载
parineumover 4 years ago
A lot of the shows they&#x27;ve cancelled just weren&#x27;t that good, even the ones I watched.<p>They hold up 3 shows as an example, Stranger Things, Game of Thrones and Schitt&#x27;s Creek. The first two were smash hits after season 1. Schitt&#x27;s Creek was a really good show from the start but it wasn&#x27;t well known until later seasons. It didn&#x27;t &quot;hit it&#x27;s stride&quot; it built up it&#x27;s audience over time. The quality was always there.<p>The shows Netflix is cancelling aren&#x27;t even close in quality.
Thorrezover 4 years ago
&gt;In 2018, the &quot;Hollywood&quot; creator Ryan Murphy landed a reported $300 million contract with Netflix. And Benioff and Weiss reportedly closed a $200 million deal last year; the news of that contract came two days after &quot;The OA&quot; was canceled. Shonda Rhimes and Kenya Barris are also in the six-figure-Netflix-deal club.<p>Those are nine-figure, not six-figure.
评论 #24774502 未加载
评论 #24774463 未加载
jarjouraover 4 years ago
The problem isn&#x27;t that Netflix cancels shows after 1 or 2 seasons. It&#x27;s that they insist on injecting mystery box plotlines and ending seasons without resolving some of them. They do this to keep you bingeing, but the end result is a lot of annoyed fans who put in the time and invest in the show without any resolution.<p>Instead of they shift to a one-and-done model with room for more seasons, then it wouldn&#x27;t matter.<p>Now Netflix has a vast library of content, yay for them, but full of half unfinished stories. Imagine going to the library with the back half of the books missing. Would you want to read the first half of the book?
mchusmaover 4 years ago
I think length is not the right issue IMO.<p>Creatively, dramas should have a clear story to tell. If that is 1 hour, or 100 hours, that is ok. But stopping unexpectedly halfway through is bad.<p>An easy way for netflix to help is to say &quot;every story on Netflix has an ending.&quot; Which has marketing value and still allows creative freedom, and actually would appeal to creators more.<p>In practice, this means &quot;you can&#x27;t tease a next season that has not been approved yet&quot; OR &quot;you can end on a cliffhanger and is show is authorized for a 1 hour wrap up episode of the next season is cancelled&quot;.
rkangelover 4 years ago
This is an interesting complaint in contrast to films. The normal complaint with films is that there is never any new IP, it&#x27;s just sequel after sequel.<p>Cutting TV shows short so they don&#x27;t get to conclude is obviously a pain for fans, but continually having new interesting TV is no bad thing.
ThePadawanover 4 years ago
YMMV based on what&#x27;s &quot;interesting&quot; to you.<p>Personally, this year Netflix has renewed shows like Carmen Sandiego for another season (despite the current season being cut short due to COVID) and The Dragon Prince for another four (yes, 4.) after only running for 3 so far.
评论 #24774631 未加载
nobodyandproudover 4 years ago
Like many, I subscribed to Netflix during the pandemic, and one thing the pandemic permits (especially when the cold season comes around) is binge watching.<p>With that in mind, I was sucked into The OA and I was annoyed to find out that it was halted.<p>ImHo, tell a complete story and then halt. A catalog &amp; graveyard of half-completed shows will be Netflix’s undoing.<p>Because why would I want to risk getting sucked into a story that won’t ever be completed?
DrBazzaover 4 years ago
Jumping the shark, and growing the beard.<p>Netflix don&#x27;t seem to want to get to that inflection point any more which is a shame. Santa Clarita Diet was a personal favourite (don&#x27;t hate me), and it had just hit its stride. And Daredevil too.<p>There&#x27;s a big after-market in shows too. I&#x27;ve watched many shows on DVD (and now on Netflix&#x2F;Amazon) long after they aired because I never saw them the first time round.
hevelvarikover 4 years ago
Just spitballing here, but the subscription model and streaming and the increasing competition is doing this to the industry. Providers will have to increase the velocity of their output to keep up. I will guess that each of these canceled series are being placed on the catalog shelf as the raw material for movies. Netflix may be playing the long game here, sacrificing viewer ill will in the present in order to build an IP catalog that will feed the pipeline for years to come.<p>Accordingly, since funds are limited and you can only produce n things concurrently, there is a certain sense in constantly churning out new IP.<p>I think this theory fits with the report in the article about creators getting 9 figure contracts as their series gets ‘cancelled’
jpzover 4 years ago
Sad that the Dark Crystal was cancelled - didn&#x27;t know that. It did look awfully expensive to produce though, and it was not kid friendly at all (all that sucking the soul out of cute little puppets would scare the crap out of my young nieces and nephews!)
评论 #24775653 未加载
kentlyonsover 4 years ago
Too soon for whom or for what? This is not explicitly stated and it seems much of the discussion is based on different assumptions. Too soon to make good shows? Too soon for you? Too soon for Netflix? All of those likely lead to different answers. It seems quite possible that optimizing for Netflix&#x27;s interests might leave some dissatisfied. But it is hard to call that cancelling too soon if it lets them get to their overall objectives. An interesting question is if Netflix themselves in optimizing for the short term reward are penalizing themselves in the long term? That is much harder to know.
wodenokotoover 4 years ago
&gt; The first season was an incomplete prequel story to Jim Henson&#x27;s innovative 1982 film, and it&#x27;s a shame that the story will go unfinished.<p>In this case I think it takes 2 to tango.<p>We don&#x27;t know what happened but either Netflix bought a season with (presumably) a promise of a second season if succesful, or they bought two seasons, with payment in to installations, and decided to bail halfway through.<p>I think the first setup is the most likely and in that case the producers then decided to try and take the viewers hostage, by producing an unfinished story, in the hopes that the an outcry for more can help demand for a season 2.
screyeover 4 years ago
There isn&#x27;t a single TV show that can&#x27;t tell a compelling story in 26 hr-long episodes (~2 seasons) Sure, some shows truly shine with time, but if your show is likely to get cancelled, then you should start tying off plot threads for the current arc.<p>A great example is the Boys. Each season ends with them tying off the main arc, and an expose that sets up for the next season. Season 2&#x27;s conclusion felt satisfactory, while still keeping me excited for what&#x27;s to come. The 1st season of Witcher does this really well too.<p>Netflix&#x27;s problem is the same one as network TV. It is just far more evident with Netflix because the binge format is central to it. When the entire show is enjoyed in a very small time span, the ending affects your perception of the show more strongly than if the show was enjoyed over years on broadcast TV. A similar phenomenon is visible with movies too, where a bad ending can often come to define the entire movie.<p>I&#x27;m surprised that TV contracts haven&#x27;t become more sophisticated and diverse with time. How about sign a 3 season contract with no extensions or mandate arc conclusions for shows whose fate is up in the air? Maybe create a final season as a low-budget short, allowing show runners to provide a conclusion when axed.<p>I&#x27;m no expert on the matter, but the complete lack of new ideas in the domain is surprising, given the degree to which Netflix has revolutionized the rest of the distribution business.
bretthowellover 4 years ago
Slow burn of this topic, this deeper analysis looked at Netflix’s impact on Hollywood too. This[1] is from 2019:<p>“[Netflix] now routinely ends shows after their second season, even when they’re still popular. Netflix has learned that the first two seasons of a show are key to bringing in subscribers—but the third ... don’t do much...”<p>^1 <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mattstoller.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;the-slow-death-of-hollywood" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mattstoller.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;the-slow-death-of-hollywo...</a>
评论 #24780211 未加载
评论 #24780288 未加载
MattGaiserover 4 years ago
The problem with Netflix is that if a show doesn’t bring new subscribers&#x2F;retain current ones, the show is worthless.<p>It doesn’t matter if a lot of people watch a show. It only matters if that show is a deal maker.<p>So it basically needs to become a cultural phenomenon or attract a hardcore base of fans. Anything else just wastes bandwidth.<p>I doubt Netflix can predict with any certainty which show that will be in the same way that VCs can’t pick which of 100 companies will IPO for a billion. So they just invest in 20 of the better ones.
评论 #24775839 未加载
LanceHover 4 years ago
The path of a series on traditional tv too often follows the path:<p>1. New show is popular 2. Gets renewed 3. Season 2 or 3 they decide to slow the story line and just have individual episodes where a problem pops up and is resolved with no advance of the overarching plot. 4. By seasons 4 the actors are now famous and getting too expensive to continue. Some drop out, new people come in. 5. It gets cancelled with many things unresolved.
dangusover 4 years ago
“Creating a problem”<p>For who exactly?<p>The whole article assumes that:<p>1. Viewers give a shit about quality<p>2. The article authors know more about whether a show is viable than Netfix (with its massively detailed viewership data)<p>In reality, Netflix only cares about subscriber count, and that incentive is both obvious and intuitive. A show winning an Emmy has nothing to do with whether or not it’s profitable.<p>I mean, see cable pre-Internet. The delusion that Netflix is something unique beyond what cable was has never been true. The only thing special about it is that there are no ads, which is not universal among the industry (do cheap Hulu, Tubi, and Pluto remind you of anything? Reminds me of cable!)<p>Critically acclaimed shows like Stranger Things might have been important to gain mindshare, but now everyone knows what Netflix is and those expensive efforts are probably not worth it. Personally, I spend most of my TV time watching House Hunters which (a) will never win critical acclaim and (b) is about the cheapest show to produce that someone can imagine.<p>But I don’t like watching one hour dramas that are there to be depressing and have expensive actors, sets, and special effects. I just want to veg out and watch some idiots buy the wrong house.
alan_nover 4 years ago
I hate when they cancel lesser known shows that maybe never had a wide audience to begin with (Dark Crystal, Dirk Gently, etc). Like why did they even bother to make the shows??? They didn&#x27;t even really give them a chance. I only just found out they had made Dirk Gently, which has so far been great, but it really bums me out that it might end badly. I&#x27;m only watching it because I&#x27;m already a fan.
webmavenover 4 years ago
Hmm. Netflix may be shooting themselves in the foot a bit here, but frankly I much prefer &quot;too many series are cancelled before hitting their stride&quot; where the shortsighted decision is being made based only on viewership and budget, than the previous situation where cancelled shows never developed an audience due to being broadcast in a bad time slot, or because they were repeatedly <i>bumped</i> from their time slot[0] (eg. by sporting events going into overtime) with missed episodes never repeated, or by episodes being shown out of order[1].<p>At least now shows are cancelled based on their intrinsic viewership. Short-sighted cancelations are still an unfortunate problem, but this is still a huge improvement over the previous status quo.<p>A bit more concerning to me is that Netflix&#x27;s &quot;throw the spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks&quot; approach is starting to lean a bit more in the direction of &quot;same but different&quot; clones of other shows with a twist to the setup, even for shows based on existing properties.<p>But, so it goes.<p>[0] eg. Dark Skies<p>[1] eg. Firefly, where the pilot wasn&#x27;t broadcast until the end of the season.
JansjoFromIkeaover 4 years ago
Netflix&#x27;s problem isn&#x27;t cancelling shows too soon, it&#x27;s an inability to make anything that endures. They&#x27;ve had loads of shows that won raves upon initially airing but haven&#x27;t really stuck around much at all.<p>They haven&#x27;t managed to make sticky shows like Friends, the Big Bang Theory or even something more recent like Brooklyn Nine Nine that people can mindlessly rewatch over and over and they haven&#x27;t managed to make top tier prestige stuff (talking Sopranos&#x2F;Wire level here, they&#x27;ve made plenty a couple of notches below). The whole platform depends on a certain kind of novelty of the algorithm being able to churn up totally new stuff that&#x27;s okay.<p>As far as cancelling stuff goes, I get the impression Netflix moreso just doesn&#x27;t renew? HBO seem to have a formula where a cancelled show will get a special to wrap things up (e.g. Looking, Hello Ladies), always thought that was pretty savvy as it probably costs quite a bit less, makes that one episode into a bit of an event for fans and leaves the overall series a lot more enticing to people in the future.
评论 #24776979 未加载
squarefootover 4 years ago
The reason so many US series are cancelled, and not just Netflix ones, is simply that there are too many of them. Producers discovered that most series attracts more viewers during their first episodes, then numbers start either exploding if the series is deemed to become a huge success, or slowly fading year after year. Therefore they already know that cancelling a series to replace it with a new one after some strong advertising will without any doubt pay in the short time.<p>How could they solve the problem without leaving watchers with unresolved plots and those awful cliffhangers? To me there are two possible solutions: either produce less series so that they&#x27;re not competing against themselves, or offer by contract a way to resolve plots by guaranteeing that a certain number of episodes will be produced anyway after the cancellation decision. I don&#x27;t see why implementing either, or even both, could be detrimental in any way to the business, unless they&#x27;re counting profits by the cent with total disregard to their customers.
sohamsankaranover 4 years ago
Netflix gained ground in original television by funding bold new stuff that nobody else would (Orange Is The New Black, BoJack). They&#x27;ve now becomes slaves to their data despite the fact that the signals they rely on are hopelessly confounded. It&#x27;s possible that they&#x27;ve hit upon the right strategy, but I both suspect and hope that isn&#x27;t true.
AQXtover 4 years ago
My only take from the article is that some people take their entertainment too seriously...<p>&quot;Netflix is disregarding the smaller but powerful fandoms it&#x27;s creating, where people are left crying out for show renewals&quot;<p>&quot;Last summer, &#x27;OA&#x27; fans protested outside Netflix&#x27;s Los Angeles headquarters for days, with one woman even going on a hunger strike.&quot;
echelonover 4 years ago
I&#x27;ve been an amateur filmmaker for awhile - it&#x27;s one of my biggest hobbies. I&#x27;m working on a startup in the streaming space that I think innovates in a competitive way.<p>I&#x27;m still working out the kinks for our first &quot;film&quot;, and I&#x27;m going to approach investors once we&#x27;ve released it. I think it&#x27;s pretty novel and not something these companies will touch before it becomes a threat. But it very much should put fear into them as it changes the business.<p>Are there any of you that are extremely passionate about film, emotion, story, character, setting, aesthetic? Do you think the current slate of productions by Netflix and Disney mostly suck? Do you like Miyazaki? If that speaks to you we should get in touch at some point. Leave me a comment and I&#x27;ll reach out when I&#x27;m ready.<p>As &quot;proof&quot; I&#x27;m not just blowing steam, my last big project (not a startup): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vo.codes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vo.codes</a>
at_a_removeover 4 years ago
Quite a lot of hit shows just need more time to incubate than others. Most Star Trek series didn&#x27;t get decent until the third season. Looking even further back, something like Cheers would have been axed almost instantly.<p>Back when I used to give a damn about television series, I followed a lot of the inside baseball, including incidents that might lead to a series getting cancelled. Some networks were just more prone to cancellation than others. For a while, Fox was particularly eager to take a sackful of new kittens down to the creek; I recall one series didn&#x27;t make four shown episodes before cancellation. The Sci-Fi Channel (later SyFy) had a particularly brutal streak for a while.<p>It&#x27;s clear that whatever any network promises at the outset, they exist in a huge tension with the actual show creators and runners (and yet more tension with the actors). All negotations should be performed with that in mind. I wonder precisely how hard an &quot;exit clause&quot; would be to wrangle. You know, you cancel the show, we get four or six episodes, at such and such budget, and such and such filming time, to wrap things up.<p>Since about 2005, my television series selection is what I call the &quot;vulture strategy:&quot; I wait until a series is cancelled before I watched. Then I wait for the hype to die down (the carcass gets more juicy). If it is still appealing after all of that, I stick my beak in. I just cannot get invested in something that might have the lifespan of a carnival guppy that could be flushed down the toilet at the first sign of listlessness.<p>Netflix in particular has been very clumsy in the execution of its shows lately, even once I filter out the endless annoyance of its dark UI patterns. Very &quot;message-y;&quot; I got a bellyful of that with the Christian types. And that&#x27;s without them going and retroactively editing their old shows. Netflix is turning into my <i>last</i> pick when I want to look for something random to watch.
neap24over 4 years ago
There are a variety of bigger problems with the current TV show culture beyond getting cancelled early. Reliance on the cliffhanger, too much pandering to current events&#x2F;politics, overuse of the &quot;mystery box&quot; plot technique, and so on.<p>There are a few other personal gripes I have that may not be shared in this community (like, I think shows are way oversexed and have far too many grotesque and gritty elements for my taste) which have basically turned me completely off of modern television shows. For the time being, I&#x27;m watching &quot;classics&quot; and movies.<p>I&#x27;m not convinced that cancelling TV shows too soon is creating a problem. The bigger problem, for me, are the above features + an over-abundance of volume of content (the ol&#x27; &quot;Netflix will produce just about anything&quot; criticism).
rayragover 4 years ago
That&#x27;s why I prefer watch anthologies like Fargo or True Detective. Each season tells a different story but it has common things (setting, vibe, etc.) with previous one and I know more or less what to expect. And if I want to skip let&#x27;s say S02 I can watch S03 witout any problems.
crowfover 4 years ago
&gt; It&#x27;s also worth noting how many of the cancellations have been shows with women and people of color prominently behind the scenes or starring. &quot;One Day at a Time,&quot; &quot;Tuca and Bertie,&quot; &quot;Glow,&quot; &quot;I Am Not Okay with This,&quot; and &quot;Everything Sucks&quot; are just a few examples of canceled shows with both diverse characters and representation behind the lens.<p>Maybe that has something to do with it. There is a common meme &quot;manga, anime, Netflix adaption&quot;. The first two show the main character looking as designed, and the last show a black woman. It ends up, if you optimize for showing every race and gender rather than entertainment, I can see why the show would be cancelled.
评论 #24775907 未加载
评论 #24776002 未加载
评论 #24776081 未加载
评论 #24775927 未加载
someonehereover 4 years ago
I think one thing most of these comments overlook (at least in my eyes) is that there’s too much to choose from.<p>I have Netflix but rarely watch it. My SO is more into Netflix. But for someone like me who’s a bit older, I open Netflix and am overwhelmed with the amount of shows on the screen. It’s way too much for me to figure out what I should watch. Recommendations, trending, etc.. where do I begin watching a show?<p>I think what I’m getting at is Netflix is just putting original content on their platform to see what sticks, however I don’t know what they want me to watch? How do I decide what to watch because obviously there’s a lot to offer.<p>This is just how I see it. The app sits idle on my TV for me and I hardly use it.
nicolas_tover 4 years ago
I&#x27;ve been burned by that quite a bit, it&#x27;s annoying watching a show for it to end with either a cliffhanger or some lame tacked on ending. I really enjoyed the Travelers for example but it sucked for it to end as it did.<p>Another thing I&#x27;ve noticed is that I tend to not watch shows when they&#x27;ve just been released, especially when it&#x27;s the second season of something I like. Instead, I wait until I have the time to enjoy the show but at at that point me viewing it doesn&#x27;t count in the metrics Netfix uses to decide in favor of continuing the show.<p>Right now though, I feel ambivalent about starting a new show on netflix because I don&#x27;t want to be disappointed in the ending.
CameronNemoover 4 years ago
Last time I watched a new show on Netflix, I literally said to myself &quot;I am ready to get hurt again&quot; before hitting play.<p>I really wish Flaked had a season 3, but I still enjoy the two seasons we got. I guess we just have to accept what we have sometimes.
arnvaldover 4 years ago
Netflix has this problem that, unlike its large competitors, they have only one source of income, and they have relatively little of their own content - Amazon and Apple can throw money at streaming because they make tons of money from other sources, Disney and HBO have years worth of content that people will happily go back to and watch with their kids.<p>So I understand Netflix&#x27; situation, they keep losing licensed content so they need to keep making up for it with quantity of new shows, but damn, knowing that a show was cancelled without a proper ending is a big &quot;no&quot; for me when I choose which series to watch.
me_me_meover 4 years ago
What Glow was cancelled?<p>I can see why they would have low viewership for OA, its unusual and bit disturbing at times. But Glow??<p>It was high quality soap opera about low quality wrestling soap opera.<p>Maybe netflix is not to blame but the people who want Stranger things 3 or 4
评论 #24776617 未加载
bartreadover 4 years ago
From my point of view the problem manifests in this way: I simply don&#x27;t bother to invest the time to watch new shows until it&#x27;s clear that they&#x27;re going to get a proper run that allows them to finish well (Breaking Bad, Justified; even Sons of Anarchy, which was a real slog for the last 3 seasons, ended well).<p>I&#x27;m tired of investing time in shows that Netflix simply drops: The Expanse (though now thankfully picked up by Amazon), Designated Survivor, and Shooter (although that was total crap, especially after season 1) spring immediately to mind, but there have been plenty of others.<p>I also won&#x27;t bother starting to watch shows that I know Netflix have cancelled before they&#x27;ve concluded (e.g., Glow), because what&#x27;s the point? And this is starting to severely erode the value of Netflix&#x27;s library to me.<p>Things that have worked incredibly well on Netflix are shows that tell self-contained stories within a single season, like Narcos or Fargo, or shows that tell have a self contained but are able to tell it in a longer form than feature film would allow. The canonical example of the latter for me is Godless, which is one of the best shows on TV, I think. Genuinely fantastic.<p>And this last point leads on to another, which others have made: US TV series are too long, typically 18 - 24 episodes per season, multiple seasons, often too bloated with filler episodes, and often suffer from ridiculous over-plotting after the first few seasons, which comes off as aimless thrashing around: Prison Break (season 3 onwards: just utter nonsense), 24 (SPOILER ALERT: I mean, seriously, WTF was that Tony Almeida betrayal storyline all about in, I think, the final season - multiple sharks were jumped and I&#x27;m <i>still</i> pissed off about it).<p>On the flipside UK TV series are often too short: 6 half-hour episodes is still quite typical, so you&#x27;re only really getting into a show and then suddenly the season ends. With that said, for some shows this has been made to work really well: Line of Duty, or the earlier seasons of Luther.<p>I do feel like, for many shows, a happy medium would be 10 - 12 hour long episodes. You could then afford to make a much more polished product, whilst still probably investing quite a bit less.
评论 #24778181 未加载
评论 #24777795 未加载
whywhywhywhyover 4 years ago
Honestly really struggling to justify paying for Netflix anymore, think there has been maybe one thing I enjoyed watching on it the past 4 months and I look through the listing every single day.<p>I also don&#x27;t think the way they make shows is very smart, it&#x27;s all optimized for trying to cause a binge watch in the realm of 10+ hours. I did watch the first 4 hours of that OA show and honestly the level of content felt about enough for a 90 minute movie just stretched out at a glacial pace and I just couldn&#x27;t stand the navel gazing required to drag it out into a 10 hour long series.
intrasightover 4 years ago
I do now prefer the &quot;mini-series&quot; approach. Like &quot;Good Omens&quot;. Take a good book and turn it into a mini-series. There are so many good books about - no need to create crappy multi-season series.
dougmwneover 4 years ago
I much prefer single season series or series that weren&#x27;t confident in their renewals. The writing is just completely different. A single series season can tell a coherent story that makes real progress and drives it&#x27;s characters to change and resolution. It&#x27;s satisfying in the way that watching LOTR extended edition can be.<p>A series planning on being on the air forever can start with a clever premise, meander on and on in no rush to get anywhere. It endlessly teases to reveal secrets, change characters, or resolve plot. But the princess is always in another castle.
fullsharkover 4 years ago
A lot of these cancellations are due to COVID right? Basically that was a hard reset on TV production, seems odd the article doesn&#x27;t mention that till the end and only as a factor re: future cancellations.
bryanlarsenover 4 years ago
If the OA and Glow have such dedicated fans, can&#x27;t another network pick up the show for an instant boost in subscribers?<p>If the contract doesn&#x27;t allow it, show creators should make sure subsequent contracts do.
评论 #24776098 未加载
yepthatsrealityover 4 years ago
Part of the issue is that people pay for an algorithmic recommendation streaming service. Prior to Netflix streaming offering, people searched and chose movies to watch in the mail based off recommendations from their social circles. When there is no discovery option, Netflix is forced to &quot;guess&quot; what it&#x27;s customers want rather than know. They&#x27;ve completely removed the social aspect of enjoying shows to the point where people say &quot;have you seen x?&quot; &quot;yes&quot; and that&#x27;s the end of the conversation.
KingOfCodersover 4 years ago
Hasn&#x27;t this been clear since the Amazon leaks some years back? Each season needs to attract new subscribers compared to something ad-driven where a season needs to have viewers.
评论 #24780130 未加载
darkersideover 4 years ago
I think it&#x27;s clear that the problem isn&#x27;t cancelling TV shows, it&#x27;s that Netflix cancels them unexpectedly.<p>I&#x27;d prefer a model where, after one season, a number of seasons is determined with input from executives, writers, cast and crew. Then everybody marches in lockstep towards a satisfying conclusion at that target.<p>You don&#x27;t end up with the 8 season long show that drags on, no end in sight. And you don&#x27;t have a cliffhanger series ending.<p>Can someone run this up the flag at Netflix please?
bluedaysover 4 years ago
I watch tv shows more than pretty much anyone I know and lately I don&#x27;t even bother watching a show unless it already has several seasons. So this is a terrible business decision. I mean there&#x27;s a reason &quot;binging&quot; because a phenomenon. I&#x27;m not going to binge a show with one season.<p>Worst news I got from this article was that The Dark Crystal got cancelled. I was looking forward to more shows so I could check it out, guess I never will now.
ReptileManover 4 years ago
Isn&#x27;t the problem with shows being so insanely expensive to produce?<p>Everything lately is very polished with extremely high production values. We have&#x2F;d this problem with AAA games in the industry. Art and asset budgets slurping the whole available resources.<p>If creators want to have long term deals they should probably learn to stretch a dollar a bit more.
评论 #24775013 未加载
dannykwellsover 4 years ago
Compare Netflix to HBO, and you&#x27;ll instantly see the difference in how they are run. Netflix prioritizes algorithmic made content, HBO artist-driven content. Not coincidentally, HBO is much better at committing to shows long term. Even with a fraction of the content, I would take HBO over Netflix any time.
patagoniaover 4 years ago
It&#x27;s a feature, not a bug. I&#x27;m sure that Netflix has the analytics to back up this decision. Just as we reap what we sow when it comes to social network gamification and profiteering and elections, we are seeing the results of content creation, subscription based pricing, and detailed analytics. Netflix does not endeavor to create great content. Netflix endeavors to create content to increase subscription and engagement rates.<p>I spend more time watching the first 5 mins of some &quot;Netflix&quot; original and then turning it off because, unsurprisingly it&#x27;s no good, than I do watching really great films. Because Netflix is just throwing spaghetti at the wall and without content curation or selective and informative promotional material, I give these new titles the benefit of the doubt and watch them. Since I watch past the first 3 mins or whatever Netlix requires for it to be considered &quot;watched&quot; I&#x27;m considered &quot;engaged&quot; and those titles go on my &quot;watched&quot; list then influence the algorithm and on and on. Meanwhile a couple hours goes by, more content is created, and the cycle repeats. Netflix 1 - Me 0
musingsoleover 4 years ago
Lot of media experts in here who know for a fact that Netflix&#x27;s decisions are terrible for business. Don&#x27;t they know about second order effects on their customer base!? I suppose it just a matter of time before they got the way of Blockbuster (you know, the corporate giant Netflix starved).
Gysover 4 years ago
&gt; Netflix won&#x27;t release viewership numbers, but it&#x27;s clear its strategy is prioritizing quantity over quality<p>That is very subjective. I watch netflix and most shows mentioned in this article seem what he&#x2F;she calls ‘quantity’ to me: from the first moment clear that there will no ending whatsoever
kazagistarover 4 years ago
I watch anime, and its great. Most shows only ever get one season. When they get more, its usually with a hiatus between seasons these days. The quality of US TV shows has finally risen in recent times, but they still haven&#x27;t learned the value of a short run that ends permanently.
tijuco2over 4 years ago
*it&#x27;s clear its strategy is prioritizing quantity over quality<p>perfect! They a launching a movie per month with a famous actor and shallow stories. I think Netflix and Google make a good parallel. Google is infamous for cancelling products that many people use too, like the beloved Google Reader.
m3kw9over 4 years ago
By season 3 you can generally tell if the creators are trying to milk the current viewers or if they really have more cohesive story to tell. I’m sure Netflix looks at that as a negative, those type of shows burn people out and correlates with decreased viewership numbers.
the_otherover 4 years ago
Optimising for attention, not art.
projprojover 4 years ago
One of the first things I do when looking at a new show to watch is try to find out if the show ends and was cancelled on a cliffhanger. Wikipedia is okay for this, but I&#x27;ve been wishing for a dedicated website with that info.
kelvin0over 4 years ago
&quot;Statements from executives have described the cancellations as the result of a cost analysis that tells Netflix a <i>longer-running show won&#x27;t lead to new subscribers</i>.&quot;<p>How about the cost analysis of loosing current subscribers?
flerchinover 4 years ago
They&#x27;re really good with their data and analytics. They&#x27;ll know if you&#x27;re cancelling your subscription. I did.<p>Otherwise all your complaining still got them at least $8.99 a month, and they saved on production costs.
nogbitover 4 years ago
More mini series are needed. The UK has this in spades and executes well. They have an end written before the first episode starts. 3 episodes or 10, but not the same drivel season after season.
coryfkleinover 4 years ago
Could be that Netflix is strategically cancelling several shows in a single wave.<p>In the same way that a company will do a single large lay-off all at once rather than several demoralizing smaller ones.
oregontechninjaover 4 years ago
I don&#x27;t care if series are short so long as the wrap up and properly end the story. It&#x27;s like America&#x27;s version BBC, great shows that run for half a season to short.
throwaway_dcntover 4 years ago
Maybe this is a game of poker. They cancel some shows as a bluff to next generation of creators that they should avoid asking for large raises for their shows past 2nd season.
simonwover 4 years ago
I&#x27;m still heart-broken about Santa Clarita Diet. First season was good, second and third seasons were absolutely brilliant. And then it was cancelled on a cliff-hangar.
评论 #24778581 未加载
pier25over 4 years ago
What&#x27;s the point of investing in a show very few people want to see?<p>Netflix has all the metrics. I doubt they cancel shows just because they can.<p>Of course there will always be some disappointed people.
edm0ndover 4 years ago
RIP season 2 of The Dark Crystal. Netflix axed it.<p>I thought it was a brilliant revamp and collaboration in between Netflix and the Henson group. It even won an Emmy.
theonlybutletover 4 years ago
I can&#x27;t stand it when a show carries on for two long. If it seems like a show will carry on past season 1 or 2 I won&#x27;t watch it.
carabinerover 4 years ago
HBO Westworld... Season 1 incredible, magical. Season 2 unraveled but was still interesting. Season 3 was just boring, nothing.
评论 #24785373 未加载
IshKebabover 4 years ago
&gt; &quot;Game of Thrones&quot; wasn&#x27;t an overnight phenomenon<p>Uhm, it pretty much was. Season 1 was hugely popular.
评论 #24775903 未加载
sg47over 4 years ago
Whoever canceled Norsemen should be fired. This is something I&#x27;ve decided to start saying.
AzzieElbabover 4 years ago
Every time I read something about Netflix, my first thought is - fk! I am still paying for it
VoxPelliover 4 years ago
I guess this is just Netflix trying to be the Google of streaming services?
Razenganover 4 years ago
I will never forgive them for cancelling The Dark Crystal :(
darepublicover 4 years ago
Please bring back mindhunter for a new season
dzongaover 4 years ago
netflix originals are bad. like most of them super bad. they either suffer from bad writing or bad directing or both. some originals might have good actors, but nowdays you just expect netflix shit to suck. hope they invest more in writers. like actually pay writers and nurture talent. but it might be an industry symptom - writing on most shows these days sucks. hbo keeps producing good shows, hulu has some good shows, prime too. netflix nada.
asimpletuneover 4 years ago
Am I the only person here that loved the OA?
NetOpWibbyover 4 years ago
_cries in Altered Carbon_
mcguireover 4 years ago
But what about all those wonderful Chinese and Korean movies and shows??!?
LargoLasskhyfvover 4 years ago
Hm. Late to the party, nevertheless I can&#x27;t resist to give my two cents to the phenomenon which is btw. not even new, or limited to Netflix.<p>First I didn&#x27;t grow up with much TV, because there were many more interesting things to do as a child, like playing in the forest. Later on I haven&#x27;t been a fan either, and finally discarded my TV in 1996 and went into cinema instead. But again, not that much.<p>For a time I substituted that with a Hauppauge WinTV in one of my PCI-slots, and had the surreal experience to watch the second plane crash into the Twin Towers in NYC live on CNN after IRC exploded with: <i>&quot;TURN ON CNN NOW!1!!&quot;</i>. Removed the card maybe a few weeks after that, because TV became toxic then, as in <i>News are bad for you</i>, and wasn&#x27;t worth the energy anymore.<p>Did a strict media diet for a few years then, until I couldn&#x27;t resist because of Battlestar Galactica, and got lost into Lost :)<p>From then on I partially catched up, but still very selective.<p>Anyways, what follows is an incomplete list of things which either never made it further than the pilot, or got canceled mid-season, or could have been longer IMO.<p>Earliest thing which comes to mind are several attempts from Gene Roddenberry with<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Genesis_II_(film)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Genesis_II_(film)</a> in 1973<p>followed by<p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Planet_Earth_(film)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Planet_Earth_(film)</a> in 74<p>and [3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Strange_New_World_(film)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Strange_New_World_(film)</a> in 75<p>Similar for [4] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Logan%27s_Run_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Logan%27s_Run_(TV_series)</a> around the same time.<p>Then the reimagined<p>[5] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Survivors_(2008_TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Survivors_(2008_TV_series)</a><p>where I can recommend the original <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Survivors_(1975_TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Survivors_(1975_TV_series)</a> if you are into realistic Non-Zombie Post-Apocalypse stuff and can get it in good quality.<p>[6] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Last_Train_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Last_Train_(TV_series)</a> from 1999 What are they going to do after? How? Where? WTF?<p>[7] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Jericho_(2006_TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Jericho_(2006_TV_series)</a> This was one of the most annoying cancelings mid-season!<p>[8] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Outcasts_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Outcasts_(TV_series)</a> from 2011 could have been more.<p>[9] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Terra_Nova_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Terra_Nova_(TV_series)</a> also from 2011 could have been much more.<p>[10] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Revolution_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Revolution_(TV_series)</a> 2011<p>[11] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Falling_Skies" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Falling_Skies</a> 2011<p>[12] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Defiance_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Defiance_(TV_series)</a> 2013<p>[13] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Rewind_(2013_film)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Rewind_(2013_film)</a> Never made it into a series. WHY?<p>[14] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ascension_(miniseries)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ascension_(miniseries)</a> 2015<p>[15] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wayward_Pines" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wayward_Pines</a> 2015<p>[16] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Occupied" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Occupied</a> 2015-2017 This one is <i>special</i> and maybe didn&#x27;t get much attention because politically incorrect with the ongoing Crimean ... how to put it, occupation, crisis? Anyways, very watchable! (I&#x27;m delighted to discover there is a third season out there now. Yay!)<p>[17] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Colony_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Colony_(TV_series)</a> 2016-2018 How do the aliens look? I mean <i>WTF</i>? What a let-down :(<p>[18] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Strain_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Strain_(TV_series)</a> 2014-2017 Not really canceled, but could have been more.<p>[19] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hard_Sun" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hard_Sun</a> 2018 Could have been so much more...<p>Maybe it&#x27;s because budgets of production companies have been tighter since the<p>[20] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932008" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80...</a> ?<p>Also more and more competition with more and more immersive games, sometimes rendered so photorealistic that players just dive in to explore the gameworld by sightseeing, and have fun <i>interacting</i> with things like in an old point-and-click adventure, just <i>seriously upgraded</i> and optionally in groups, networked :)
o_class_starover 4 years ago
Bean counters shit up everything. This started in traditional publishing in the 1990s and it&#x27;s responsible for the oppressive mediocrity of the &quot;high literature&quot; scene in the US. Money people never, ever know their place. They don&#x27;t understand that <i>culture</i> is more important than they are, and it shows.<p>It started with the chain bookstores. Used to be, getting in was the hard part, but once a writer got published, he stayed published. His editor would keep supporting his books until he broke out. Chain bookstores wrecked this. They&#x27;d pull an author&#x27;s numbers, see that the first book was a flop, and pass on the second. They also introduced the 8-week rotation, which meant that reader word of mouth (a slower process) got disenfranchised, forcing publishers to pick winners (lead titles) and losers before the books were even launched.<p>This changed the incentive structure. Instead of having to get one person, who knew literature, to believe in his work, an author has to convince a whole committee of people. If the editor can&#x27;t sell the book to the money people, it gets no marketing or publicity and it dies.<p>Then there are the literary agents, who don&#x27;t even read 99 percent of the work sent to them. That&#x27;s done by unpaid college-age interns. So, instead of writing a book readers will love, your focus becomes writing a book that people will think their bosses like. It&#x27;s a totally different game.<p>I&#x27;m not surprised this is happening to Netflix. We tend to have a pro-data bias in technology. We don&#x27;t realize that when the money people get their hands on data, that unless we are extremely editorial in the context in which they interpret and use that data, it&#x27;s going to be a disaster. They don&#x27;t have altruistic motives and they don&#x27;t work nearly as hard as we do to understand complexity-- it&#x27;s best to think of them as a different species.
评论 #24776104 未加载
评论 #24774808 未加载
评论 #24775662 未加载
评论 #24775134 未加载
评论 #24777226 未加载
评论 #24774815 未加载
评论 #24776624 未加载
评论 #24775676 未加载
评论 #24781049 未加载
评论 #24778997 未加载
评论 #24775906 未加载
评论 #24777036 未加载
评论 #24775733 未加载
评论 #24776690 未加载
评论 #24776190 未加载
lumberingjackover 4 years ago
Change my mind altered carbon failed because all they did season 2 was virtue signal liberal BS I made it through three episodes I&#x27;m a former Democrat just couldn&#x27;t take it virtue signaling was retarded
galkkover 4 years ago
It&#x27;s certainly a skill to drop hints of existence of racism and sexism into everything. It&#x27;s especially funny in case of Netflix, the company that notoriously pushes it&#x27;s agenda into almost every show.<p>&gt; It&#x27;s also worth noting how many of the cancellations have been shows with women and people of color prominently behind the scenes or starring.