TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Object Detection at 1840 FPS with TorchScript, TensorRT and DeepStream

162 pointsby briggersover 4 years ago

8 comments

mozak1111over 4 years ago
I see this and I immediately think of &quot;trash sorting&quot; at ultra high speed. If one can combine this with a bunch of accurate (laser precision) air guns, to shoot and move individual pieces of trash you can sort through a truck load of trash in a matter of seconds, perhaps in the air while they are being dumped! compare this approach with how we are currently doing it [0] - Somebody should get Elon Musk on this project right away!<p>[0] - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=QbKA9uNgzYQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=QbKA9uNgzYQ</a>
评论 #24818851 未加载
评论 #24818539 未加载
评论 #24820028 未加载
评论 #24818503 未加载
评论 #24818976 未加载
cm2187over 4 years ago
Out of curiosity, what are the possible use cases for object detection at &gt;100 fps? I assume it would have to be objects that move very fast, i.e. nothing ordinary that I can think of.<p>[edit] actually stupid question. I assume it&#x27;s more about throughput than fps, i.e. be able to process lots of streams on the same machine, for instance for doing mass analysis of CCTV streams.
评论 #24817585 未加载
评论 #24817282 未加载
评论 #24817664 未加载
评论 #24817301 未加载
评论 #24818377 未加载
评论 #24817978 未加载
评论 #24818454 未加载
评论 #24823538 未加载
评论 #24818456 未加载
评论 #24818780 未加载
评论 #24817437 未加载
评论 #24818775 未加载
评论 #24817951 未加载
评论 #24818100 未加载
janimoover 4 years ago
How portable are these techniques to other architectures? Could &gt;100 FPS be realistically achieved today using only CPUs or mobile phones?
评论 #24821762 未加载
评论 #24818223 未加载
评论 #24817624 未加载
gcanyonover 4 years ago
A weird question, but since there&#x27;s another article on HN right now about programming language energy efficiency <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24816733" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24816733</a> any idea whether going from 9fps to 1840fps consumes the same power, 200x the power, or somewhere in between?
评论 #24817460 未加载
评论 #24817880 未加载
Grimm1over 4 years ago
Good work getting TensorRT running we had a real pain in the butt recently when working with it and just opted to go with ONNXRuntime, their graph optimizer and their TensorRT backend -- may not be as fast as straight TensorRT from comparisons I&#x27;ve seen but it got us to a competitive inference and latency so we&#x27;re happy with it.
评论 #24822522 未加载
moron4hireover 4 years ago
Any word on latency? I didn&#x27;t see anything in the article. I guess, since this is a synthetic test just pumping a single image file through repeatedly instead of an actual video stream, then it wouldn&#x27;t realistically be measurable. But if latency is particularly low, this would be a boon for AR systems.
评论 #24818173 未加载
评论 #24818772 未加载
stabblesover 4 years ago
&gt; There is evidence (measured using gil_load) that we were throttled by a fundamental Python limitation with multiple threads fighting over the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL).<p>Can anyone comment on how often this is a problem and if this problem is truly fundamental to Python? Could it be solved in a Python 3.x release?
评论 #24817767 未加载
评论 #24817243 未加载
indeyetsover 4 years ago
Name clash again… I thought about <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;deepstream.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;deepstream.io&#x2F;</a>