TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

DotCloud releases support for Perl, aka Camel-as-a-Service

96 pointsby jpetazzoabout 14 years ago

12 comments

mmaunderabout 14 years ago
Nice one guys. Our company uses mostly Perl for our server side code. We'll keep you in mind as a provider.
shykesabout 14 years ago
As usual, the DotCloud team is hanging out here to answer questions, hand out truckloads of invites, etc.
评论 #2491819 未加载
daxelrodabout 14 years ago
What a fantastic idea!<p>I would love to know more about the discussions you had with miyagawa, and how the design for this evolved. Anything this elegant must have taken a ton of iterations.<p>Oh, and may I have an invite, please?
questorianabout 14 years ago
We are a Perl shop and this is good new for us - we need PSGI and multiple databases - This _could_ be the step we are looking for to offload our web stack...it is taking too much time to manage all that, rather than getting on with coding!
agentultraabout 14 years ago
Great news for the Perl community. Congrats! And thanks as well to dotcloud for making it happen. :)
groutabout 14 years ago
I would like one (1) invite. Or maybe two. Please?
评论 #2491921 未加载
davecardwellabout 14 years ago
Are there plans for a “Perl worker” component?
评论 #2492336 未加载
poisonbitabout 14 years ago
Codes exhausted... anyway nice to read this.<p>DotCloud++ Miyagawa++ Perl++<p>Good luck !
g123gabout 14 years ago
This entry in their FAQ after the April 21st outage brought a chuckle-<p>Where is DotCloud hosted?<p>DotCloud runs on Amazon EC2. More specifically, we run on the us-east-1 region, across multiple availability zones.
评论 #2492315 未加载
评论 #2492347 未加载
kengatabout 14 years ago
this looks really cool. please send an invite code my way and i'll kick the tires. thanks in advance.
bbbbbbbbbabout 14 years ago
it seems I am not the only to not get the point of PSGI:<p><a href="http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2011/03/why-psgiplack-matters-testing.html#comment-794" rel="nofollow">http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2011/03/why-psgiplack-matt...</a><p>It resumes quite well my opinion and concern regarding the doc.
bbbbbbbbbabout 14 years ago
huh?<p>- No Apache????<p>- why force a rather devish level PSGI module on all web applications???? oh, yeah, you've been advised by the guy who made the port...<p><pre><code> i've been using CGI::Fast under Apache for years and it has been working just PERFECTLY fine. Do not see the need to change especially when the PSGI doc is so badly written... At least the doc states that people who supports mod_perl/CGI::Fast will not see much benefit of switching to PSGI... </code></pre> - what is the Perl version?
评论 #2492230 未加载
评论 #2492669 未加载
评论 #2492320 未加载