TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Go standard library benchmarks – Intel vs. M1

58 pointsby jeremylevyover 4 years ago

8 comments

steeleduncanover 4 years ago
This compares a 2020 M1 13&quot; Macbook Pro with a 2017 13&quot; Intel Macbook Pro. The 2020 machine is faster and that is great, but its also 3 years newer.<p>Is this more or less than the expected improvement in benchmarks if this were an Ice Lake or Ryzen 4000 CPU in an equivalent form factor? Are there similar benchmarks comparing e.g. a 2020 Dell XPS 13 to an M1 Macbook Pro?
评论 #25158878 未加载
jugover 4 years ago
So it basically excels at everything but cryptography where it&#x27;s terrible in comparison. I found this a little interesting because it should have custom hardware specifically for this (i.e. an AES engine which is what&#x27;s being benchmarked here), formerly in the separate Apple T2 security chip? I wonder if this test simply doesn&#x27;t use that hardware (lack of support in Go libs?) or that it does but it really is this much worse. (or a third option -- there is support but the T2 doesn&#x27;t accelerate many of the features tested and it&#x27;s more special purpose for only specific calls from macOS)
评论 #25158767 未加载
评论 #25158975 未加载
评论 #25164397 未加载
评论 #25158758 未加载
Entalpiover 4 years ago
Exciting times for CPU architectures this year with both the M1 and Zen 3 being highly competitive. The 2010s were a bit of a stagnation when it comes to performances, lets hope more the 2020s is more interesting.
评论 #25158766 未加载
reacharavindhover 4 years ago
If M1 is indeed this good at most tasks, it would be amazing if Apple were to release server grade Apple Silicon CPUs....<p>Imagine if we were able to run Linux kernel on such CPUs that didn&#x27;t care about putting in the low power cores or GPU cores and optimised even more for performance. One can only dream so wild.<p>Some HPC shops would build racks and racks of those.
评论 #25159021 未加载
评论 #25159024 未加载
评论 #25159378 未加载
haunterover 4 years ago
Misleading not sure why this is on the front page. That&#x27;s a 2017 i5 Kaby Lake CPU. Either make a through review, or comapre against the latest not just a random old CPU
评论 #25159045 未加载
评论 #25159781 未加载
fockover 4 years ago
So, I read correctly, these are microbenchmarks, ran 5 times each (it&#x27;s not specified)? Also anyone notice the extreme performance difference for non-CPU-bound things (like: DNS-lookup).<p>I&#x27;m still unconvinced and wait for some good old BLAS...
评论 #25161238 未加载
评论 #25159094 未加载
agnivadeover 4 years ago
Nice job.<p>A better way might have been to run the Go1 benchmarks instead. That contains a pre-selected set of benchmarks that tests a variety of workloads.
romanoderomaover 4 years ago
benchmarked against Core i5-7267U released 3th of January 2017, 4 years ago.