TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: What sources do you ignore?

12 pointsby nondeveloperover 4 years ago
When I’m browsing HN I tend to automatically ignore submissions based on their sources. Examples:<p>Medium and lately Substack: Often formulaic, low-effort, or self-promotional.<p>Aeon, Nautilus, Atlas Obscura: Long-form writing with little informational payoff, attention-bait.<p><i>The Atlantic</i>: Culture war click-bait.<p><i>The New York Times</i>, <i>Bloomberg</i>: Paywall, even if there is an outline.com or archive.[domain] link.<p>Conversely, I tend to check out submissions from personal blogs and more scientific&#x2F;technical sources like <i>Scientific American</i> and IEEE’s <i>Spectrum</i>.<p>Does anyone else do this?

7 comments

wallflowerover 4 years ago
&gt; When I’m browsing HN I tend to automatically ignore submissions based on their sources<p>In a world of infinite choices, I believe that making deliberate choices is a good exercise, whether you do it via a strict whitelist&#x2F;blacklist domain filter or some other means.<p>Many times, I don&#x27;t actually read the article and just read some of the comments. Instead of filtering by the domain where the article is hosted, I use the title and its underlying theme or subject as the filter for which article comments I will read. I&#x27;m not interested in every single subject posted on HN so I just look for the subjects that I am interested in. Reading the actual article can take time. For me, I find skimming some of the discussion in the comments as a quick proxy on what the article is actually saying or the value of the article.<p>With all filtering, there is always the risk of false negatives where you skip something that you would have found of value or really interesting.<p>I agree that some of the most interesting articles are from non-mainstream sources. For example, the recent article about weaving.
评论 #25234160 未加载
bot41over 4 years ago
Quora (poor content, dark patterns), Medium (slow loading, poor content), facebook&#x2F;insta (poor logged out experience), twitter (poor ux)
commonturtleover 4 years ago
I ignore 100% of Medium, it&#x27;s always low quality. As you say Substack is also heading in that direction. I like Atlas Obscura, even though it&#x27;s just factoids and not information that I&#x27;ll ever use.<p>Ignore most news outlets: NYT, Atlantic, Bloomberg, WSJ, Techcrunch, Vice, etc.<p>Will read: personal blogs, Substacks (for now), niche publications (e.g. Lapham&#x27;s quarterly), twitter links.
quickthrower2over 4 years ago
Yes very similar. Also on the other end, quantamagazine submissions are a definite read!
young_unixerover 4 years ago
I don&#x27;t open links to TechCrunch, Vice, Medium, Twitter.<p>In the case of Twitter I make an exception when the submission title is extremely enticing, in which case I copy the URL and open it in that Thread Reader thing.
Pick-A-Hill2019over 4 years ago
I skip all Twitter links. To each their own, but the few of them that I have checked out have been mostly flame-bait, unsourced claims etc etc). I skip Reddit links too but for different reasons.
评论 #25236558 未加载
评论 #25230047 未加载
collywover 4 years ago
Wikipedia for anything with a political slant.