Here's something I learned: don't be wishy washy. Avoid pandering to the person you're emailing - it takes up words and sounds pathetic.<p>I've done this in the past and been the recipient. It just goes bad.<p>Busy people work on short terse communication, unless they are actively in a conversation with you. And, in general, they will appreciate the first few emails you send them being of the same - condensed and full of content.<p>Never worry about being rude by not saying please every other word.<p>On another note, I mildly dislike this one:<p><i>Show your target respect by responding to everything immediately. Just because the VC you're emailing might not get back to you immediately, doesn't mean that you have the same privilege. Ron Conway famously makes immediately email responses a pre-condition for investment.</i><p>I'm a busy guy, I get a LOT of work email each day. And yet the people we work for seem to see slow response as an indication of laziness :S Even though it takes them a week to respond. Yes, you're important to me, you are potentially worth a lot of money to me and I really want to keep you happy. But give me a fracking chance!<p>So, investors, cut founders a bit of slack :)
I've had some success with sending email that has a short and long version (or if you include the subject itself, 3 levels). Ask your main question in the first sentence or two, enough to provide context, detail, and what you want.<p>At the end say "[more detail below if needed]". Draw a line in the email ===== and include more detail below that they can dip into if necessary.
i get a ton of email from people who want stuff. i try to reply but it's a barrage.<p>Some stuff that makes it easier:<p>- understand that I am likely to read your email on an iPhone. keep it brief, don't write an essay.<p>- if i reply and say something like "interesting, please send an executive summary" or "i'd love to see a demo" then do that or offer something equivalent/better. i do not want to meet you to see your demo, etc etc etc.<p>- don't ask for extremely unlikely things and expect a reply<p>- it takes me a week or two to get to low-priority stuff. don't email me and ask for a detailed response within an hour. if you do have a deadline, tell me so, so i can prioritize appropriately. i'm looking at you, journalists.<p>- if you are pitching a startup, don't pitch investors who have clear and obvious conflicts.<p>- if you are offering an advisory role, be up front about offering equity or something.<p>that said, i try my best. that guy who had acquisition questions a few months ago on Ask HN? i got him to someone who got the deal done.
As a former founder and now VC, I am thrilled about this post. It's so true. There is nothing I like more than learning about startups and helping entrepreneurs and founders. If that wasn't the case I would find some other line of work.<p>That's why I'm so sad when people view my inability to get to email in a timely fashion as a proxy for my interest or the type of person I am.<p>I just get a ton of email and it's impossible to respond to it all, much less in a timely fashion. I'll try my best to get to it all, but if for some reason you haven't heard back in awhile try again and again. If nothing else I'll notice your determination and provide some feedback.
I agree this advice does not only apply to emailing VC's. It applies to emailing ANYONE in the course of doing your job: interns to CEO's.<p>5 sentences often is too much. If you can get it down to 3 sentences (or even 1 or 2 with judicious subject line) that is better. Just state the situation and what action you request.<p>For christ's sake, above all, don't resort to voicemail.
<i>Include a Short, Professional Signature
My standard signature includes my name, company, blog, Twitter, and LinkedIn. If I want a phone call or fax or meeting, it'll include phone number, fax, address.</i><p>Four lines is not short. Nobody cares about your blog, Twitter, or LinkedIn.<p>I sign my emails either "--Jon" or "Regards, Jonathan Rockway" depending on who the intended recipient is. If you want to read my blog, just type my name into the nearest search engine.
Question, relating to email etiquette.<p>Do people send "thanks" emails at the end of a discussion? Sometimes I'll have a discussion with someone online. Sometimes there's no more to say, and I always wonder if I should send a "thanks" email. No content, but just something to close the loop and a minor show of gratitude. But it seems wasteful. In a verbal converation it's a no-brainer to just say, "thanks for the time", but in email its not clear if its better to do it or to just end the convo by not sending another.
I just weighed in on this in a slightly different way... how to email people for the first time: <a href="http://chriscoyier.net/2011/05/04/how-to-write-an-email-to-someone-for-the-first-time/" rel="nofollow">http://chriscoyier.net/2011/05/04/how-to-write-an-email-to-s...</a>
As I said in the comments, isn't there a little irony in an essay on concise communication that opens with <i>seven</i> mostly content-free paragraphs? Much more effective, I suspect, would be to rely on the title as a hook, launch right into the prescribed methods, and argue the case in each one.<p>As it is, how to actually email busy people is an entire window scroll away.
These are some good advices, and they're not limited to VC. In the academic domain researchers and professors also have a lots of email to deal with, maybe not as much but we also have to consider that reading email is even less their job than a VC (and they have enough freakin administrative tasks that take on their working time). As a matter of fact, I've <i>always</i> had quicker (and often better) responses when I wrote email that more or less follow the rules described in the linked post, for instance when looking for an internship, or requesting a specific paper.
>If you can fit the entire question into the header, just do it and include #eom at the end, which means 'end of message'. Yes, it feels weird. Do it anyways.<p>This I cannot agree with, however. I receive a fair amount of email, and I just cannot stand when people do this. It annoys me to no end and will most likely earn an instant-delete to the email.
If it doesn't all fit in the subject line, put what you're asking for in the first sentence. This makes the purpose of your email immediately clear, and if the recipient is interested in the details they can read the next four lines. A busy person will appreciate you getting to the point and not beating around the bush.
I've found that sending emails when you know they'll be at work (so they'll notice it) is tremendously useful -- say 9am, 2pm, 5pm. People will tend to answer immediately incoming messages before a long queue of messages from the previous day that need attention.<p>A little shameless self-promotion, that's exactly one of the use-cases we envisioned for our company's product, Momentomail ( <a href="http://www.momentomail.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.momentomail.com</a> ).<p>My co-founder and I actually do this with each other, schedule messages so they'll be received sometime in the morning when we're both likely to be working through our mail queue from the end of the day and night before.
I actually almost invariably use the same template for all my communications; 3 straight to the point paragraphs, leaving the details to further discussion (if need there is). Start with the context, followed by the matter at hand and finally the expose the solution, proposal or action required by the recipient. Work in most cases.<p>I also use the Boomerang plugin for Gmail to schedule my emails to be sent at 9:30 AM, local time of the recipient (you want to be at the top of the inbox when he grabbed his coffee and starts going through his emails).
Sometimes, if you've recently met the person, it's just good to send a "nice to meet you" follow-up with no ask at all. You're very likely to get a response, and once the response has been made, you can make the simple ask (once they've responded once, they're probably more likely to respond again).<p>This is akin to the "one-line hook" in online dating: <a href="http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-messages/" rel="nofollow">http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-messages/</a>
I'm trying to work out emailing for sponsorships for projects that we're running. It's generally cold-calling, but not a shotgun approach - we work pretty hard to come up with companies who would have something to gain from the project.<p>I'm going to try some of these tips, but would an email with 'Seeking Sponsorship' in the subject get caught in your personal spam filter?
Here's my tip: give me something actionable. The e-mails that sit around unanswered are those with wishy-washy requests that require me to think about what the person <i>really</i> wants. The ones that get fast, useful answers are direct and obvious. The "five sentences or fewer" item will get you most of the way there.
For someone just getting involved with this space, these tips definitely seem helpful. Seems like this is a bit contingent on prior contact and not first-time intro. Should it be in person > then e-mail? A bit confused...
I find it works best to keep each email short and direct. Provide a title which has real content. Keep on topic. NEVER mix two topics in an email; inevitably all but one of the topics will be ignored.
One of the reasons i keep it to 5 lines mails is that most of the top shots I know are reading their emails on devices like the blackberry. Short and simple, even telegraphic gets you responses.
How do you pitch someone while seeking a job/project in 5-6 lines of email? Especially when you are going in as a team rather than sending individual resumes!
This advice more or less matches my experience with busy people, although there are some people who just won't read your email no matter how you write it.
i used to use <a href="http://five.sentenc.es/" rel="nofollow">http://five.sentenc.es/</a> as a guideline.<p>i tried to use <a href="http://three.sentenc.es/" rel="nofollow">http://three.sentenc.es/</a>, but as i am not a native english speaker, it's hard for me to be compact AND understandable at the same time.
the shortness is very important...before I used to spell everything out thinking it'd help them make their decision...and my response rate was horrible.<p>now it's just a simple...would your company be interested in X...and if they say yes...thats when I send the rest of the details
in cases like this, i always tell people to write like a news article: open with your conclusion!<p>nobody wants to read through as you try to explain all the reasons for your conclusion. if you can't draw them in in the first line, you've lost them