TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Google Storage Now Available To Developers

221 pointsby ASUmusicMANabout 14 years ago

16 comments

jcampbell1about 14 years ago
5 years, 1 month and 28 days after S3 is publicly launched. It is just a reminder that the threat by incumbents to startups is hardly worth worrying about.
评论 #2538033 未加载
评论 #2537921 未加载
petefordeabout 14 years ago
The pricing is far less interesting to me than the differences between GS and S3. In some significant ways, GS appears to be a much more technically sophisticated product. And there are some arguably less used functionality like BitTorrent which are removed from the picture.<p>The ACL scheme is significantly more flexible on GS. In fact, one of the two major problems I have with S3 is a non-issue on GS:<p>1. All files on S3 are not world-readable when they are first uploaded. You cannot change the default permission for a file uploaded to a bucket. On GS you can set the default ACL on a bucket to world-readable.<p>2. For me, the most incredible thing GS could do right now is add a callback API. I want it to notify my application when my bucket is updated, webhooks style.<p>With both 1 &#38; 2 in place, you can build storage driven applications in the cloud that don't require constant polling. Man, that would sure be something.
zbaileyabout 14 years ago
A compelling reason for our use case to switch from S3 is their support for lots of buckets coupled with CNAME support:<p><a href="http://code.google.com/apis/storage/docs/reference-uris.html" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/apis/storage/docs/reference-uris.html</a><p>Due to Amazon's limitation of 100 buckets per account and the coupling between bucket name and CNAME, hosting files for our clients and supporting custom CNAMEs has not been possible for us. If we were to move to Google Storage, it would be.
评论 #2538026 未加载
评论 #2537595 未加载
评论 #2537799 未加载
jbyersabout 14 years ago
It's really nice to see that boto (python AWS library) supports S3 and Google Storage side-by-side. Being able to pick and choose providers behind the same API is how the cloud should be.
评论 #2537830 未加载
gburtabout 14 years ago
Can someone explain why I would choose this over S3, when S3's starting rate is 0.14 / GB and goes down from there?
akshatabout 14 years ago
At Google's scale I would have guessed that they would have had no difficulty in matching and even beating Amazon's pricing. This is surprising. Why so?
评论 #2539651 未加载
评论 #2538311 未加载
ASUmusicMANabout 14 years ago
No more invites required to use, but at first glance it appears to be more expensive than S3.
评论 #2537174 未加载
评论 #2537359 未加载
riobardabout 14 years ago
Download data: $0.15 to Americas, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa $0.30 to Asia-Pacific<p>So if a bunch of people from Japan decide to download from your app, you are screwed.
评论 #2538291 未加载
lzmabout 14 years ago
A bucket in Latin America would be a killer feature. Doesn't Google already have a data center in São Paulo?
MatthewBabout 14 years ago
I am a little confused about Google Storage Manager. Is this supposed to be a consumer facing product? AKA dropbox killer?
评论 #2537589 未加载
tybrisabout 14 years ago
Only 5 years, 1 month, and 28 days after Amazon made S3 available to developers.
baneabout 14 years ago
meh, in 3 years they'll probably just announce a new pricing structure where every reasonable use of this ends up with 1000%-2000% price hike (GAE user here, grumble grumble)
neworbitabout 14 years ago
Damn, I was hoping this was going to spur Amazon to cut prices.
reedlawabout 14 years ago
Anyone know how to copy an S3 bucket to Google Storage?
评论 #2537871 未加载
epynonymousabout 14 years ago
does anyone know if s3 is profitable?
评论 #2539312 未加载
zackattackabout 14 years ago
i thought this was just an auxiliary service to other google services.. not really a competitor to s3?