TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Kentucky wants to make it a felony to post law enforcement names online

18 pointsby us0rover 4 years ago

7 comments

jollofricepeasover 4 years ago
Seems like a way to avoid accountability. At the very least full name snd DOB should be provided to the public and or press to prevent abuse of power.<p>The order specifically states that posting ANY of the following would be a felony:<p>1. First and last name;<p>2. Social Security number or other government-issued identifier;<p>3. Date of birth;<p>4. Home or physical address, including any second or vacation address, property tax or property ownership records, or directions to or identifying photographs of any primary, secondary, or vacation residence;<p>5. Birth and marriage records;<p>6. Vehicle registration;<p>7. Photographs of any vehicle, including photographs of any license plates, vehicle registration, or VIN numbers;<p>8. Identification of any children of the individual under the age of eighteen (18);<p>9. Electronic mail address, or other personal e-mail addresses;<p>10. Home, personal mobile, or direct telephone number to the individual;<p>11. Financial account number or credit or debit card number;<p>12. Biometric, health, or medical data, or insurance information; or<p>13. School, day care, or employment locations.
jrs235over 4 years ago
4 legs good. 2 legs better. Everyone has rights. Some people just have more and better rights than others.<p>I understand the reasoning, protecting government officials from mad mobs. Names should be fine, addresses maybe not. But then it should apply to everyone. What if I accidentally post someone&#x27;s address not knowing they are a &quot;protected&quot; person?
aetimmesover 4 years ago
IANAL, but this seems like a pretty clear violation of the First Amendment. Even if this bill passes (which, ridiculous bills get proposed all the time and never go anywhere), I can&#x27;t imagine it standing up to challenges in the courts.
m463over 4 years ago
I think this might have a few benefits:<p>- better handing of personal information of everyone, on the premise it might be a law enforcement officer<p>- organized crime cannot erase witnesses (and of course lesser things like intimidation)
yeetawayhnover 4 years ago
&quot;What about my 1st amendment right to dox law enforcement officers?&quot;
austincheneyover 4 years ago
Besides an obvious slippery slope argument what is the harm in this?
评论 #25485726 未加载
评论 #25485828 未加载
评论 #25486451 未加载
jrs235over 4 years ago
This title has been editorialized and dramatized. While PII includes names, the poster changed and focused on names in order to make it more sensational.
评论 #25485678 未加载