TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Why open-source prefers Google Groups as discussion engine?

2 pointsby pankratievabout 14 years ago
Node.js http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs<p>Ruby on Rails http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk<p>etc<p>What benefits or special features do Google Groups have? Posting via email?

3 comments

huxleyabout 14 years ago
If you ask around, you'll find that most of the people running Google Groups either hate or dislike Google Groups, however when their groups were first started it had a low-entry cost: it was free of charge and Google handled most of the annoyances of running a mailing list. New groups get added because it is still simpler than running your own mailing list.<p><a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/google-groups-is-dead/" rel="nofollow">http://ejohn.org/blog/google-groups-is-dead/</a><p>One should never underestimate the power of inertia.
评论 #2548687 未加载
mindcrimeabout 14 years ago
They're free and they work reasonably well. They're not substantially better or worse than the other freely available mailing list services, in my experience. For projects that don't feel like running their own server and hosting a Mailman (or whatever) instance, they work fine.
xorglorbabout 14 years ago
It's simple. It works. It's free.