"for commercial profit" (quote from the article) should be added to the title, as it completely changes the meaning. (actual bill text is "for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain")
Yet another reason why the line-item veto should be allowed at the Federal level.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-item_veto_in_the_United_States" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-item_veto_in_the_United_S...</a>
This is a disgusting abuse of law (as usual it feels like these days). Streaming is essential to some people during these times as an outlet for relief to the stress.