> “They are not self-driving systems,” said Supt. Gary Graham of Alberta RCMP Traffic Services.<p>> “These technologies assist drivers, but do not replace them,” said the statement from the federal institution responsible for transportation policies and programs ...<p>> Tesla’s website states, “All new Tesla cars come standard with advanced hardware capable of providing Autopilot features today, and full self-driving capabilities in the future.”<p>... full self-driving capabilities in the FUTURE ...<p>So it is a DISHONEST marketing issue that creates a wrong perception in the consumer, and that's what the government should address.<p>Create regulation that do not allow such vehicles to be marketed as "self-driving". Create some kind of certification to earn the right to advertise a vehicle as "self-driving". And define and standardize better labels for the current technologies used, and publicize it well.
I find it a little concerning that the car is allowed to drive in autopilot with the seats reclined. I thought there were warnings for taking your hands off the steering wheel? I suppose they can be ignored. But full recline is a bit OTT.
<i>"Witnesses claim the man behind the wheel and his passenger were asleep with their seats fully reclined, as their Tesla travelled up to 150 km/h on the freeway near Ponoka..."</i><p>Given this and the man's other past incidents, the Tesla was only a minor contributing factor in the guy's global stupidity and danger that he inflicts on the world daily?<p>Edit: Btw, what would be the end accident scenario here? Presuming that the car wouldn't hit any other car on the road, would it lose control on a curve that was too tight for the speed, or fail at the end of the freeway or something? Would it alarm and then come to a gradual stop? Not a Tesla owner here.
> Provincial motor vehicle acts don’t address self-driving vehicles<p>Right now, in Canada, we have to meet certain criteria and pass multiple tests to get our drivers license without which we cannot legally drive on public roads.<p>Until there is some kind of similar certification for self driving systems I don't understand why there would be any legal difference between doing this in a Tesla Model S and doing it in a '94 Miata.
The last time this hit HN the article was a bit more informative.<p>Two people in the car with both front seats reclined, “appearing to be asleep.”<p>The asleep part is almost certainly sensational drivel. This is a driver with a history of reckless driving who was screwing around with his friend.<p>But because he was screwing around in a <i>Tesla</i> it is therefore newsworthy.<p>The seats were reclined, but there is no evidence that the driver and passenger were both asleep. They “appeared asleep” because the seats were reclined.<p>This was undoubtably a stupid prank. I’ll be glad for the day when kids can’t pull stupid pranks in their cars. The trade-off is we’re unlikely to truly “own” our own cars at that time, they will operate as essentially private taxis.
Tesla sells an upgrade literally named “Full Self-Driving Capability”. The owner/driver is <i>clearly</i> liable but a strong argument could be made that Tesla should not be allowed to name things the way they do.
x (40?) years from now:<p>12-car accident triggered by manual mode<p>defense attorneys stated a poor decision due to fatigue, while prosecutors provided evidence that the driver had taken a 25-minute power nap, woke up and performed well in a class she was taking, and then proceeded to override the autonomous vehicle system in a manner which showed specific and malicious intent to cause the accident.
I’m a huge fan of Elon Musk so take this with a grain of salt, but the company has totally misled and overhyped the self driving feature. It’s almost like a wink and a nod, giving people a false perception, and that’s wrong.
Curious: Why would the Tesla be speeding, since it was in “autopilot” mode? Wouldn’t it know about the speed limits? Or dis the driver set on cruise control first?