The last section quotes the most promising bit of epidemiology I've seen on the origin of the epidemic, but alters the explanation of what happened a bit.<p>The article suggests that the gain of function was accomplished via passaging of the samples that the miners obtained, but the key point in the paper that is being cited is that the gain of function happened entirely inside the miner's lungs.<p>How did WIV get samples of this virus? Well, they harvested the thymuses of at least one of the miners, which then contained the fully passaged virus, no laboratory passaging necessary.<p>Why didn't this cause an outbreak in 2013? Initially, the virus was not infectious to humans without the kind of megadose that the miners received, and by the time it had evolved enough affinity for human ACE2 receptors, all of the medical staff involved in the care of the patients were extremely careful.<p>I'm just paraphrasing the paper that is cited in the articles conclusion. It's worth a read, and NYmag gets some of the details wrong. <a href="https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/a-proposed-origin-for-sars-cov-2-and-the-covid-19-pandemic/" rel="nofollow">https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/a-propos...</a>
This is nothing more than conspiracy mongering.<p>Despite the author's protestations of this-is-not-conspiracy-theory, it is a conspiracy theory. The pull quotes include one beginning with: "I’m just asking, Is it a complete coincidence ...". Ah, yes, the old favorite of Qanons everywhere, "I'm just asking".<p>This is just another attempt to cause a significant fraction of the population to throw up their hands in resignation, and excuse everyone in the USA from responsibility.