TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

BadEconomics: Putting $400M of Bitcoin on your company balance sheet

167 pointsby nikiviover 4 years ago

60 comments

frankenst1over 4 years ago
Like most posts critical of Bitcoin it ignores that<p><pre><code> - Bitcoin becomes less volatile over time - Bitcoin was less volatile than TLSA, AMZN or AAPL in 2020 (3-month realised volatility) [0] - Bitcoin becomes less risky over time (since despite increased incentives to &quot;hack&quot; it, no exploits happened) </code></pre> It also repeats typical nocoiner fallacies like &quot;it has no intrinsic value&quot; and &quot;gold is used for jewelry&quot;, ignoring that the ability to independently verify the money supply and being able to transfer money across political boundaries without censorship is probably the most important intrinsic value one could hope for in a MoE&#x2F;SoV.<p>New in this post was the author&#x27;s stance to trust the Fed to keep inflation predictable:<p><pre><code> &quot;as long as the Fed isn’t run by spider monkeys stacked in a trench coat, the inflation is likely to be within reasonable bounds&quot; &quot;well-run currencies like the USD, GBP, CAD, EUR, etc. all lose their value at a low and most importantly fairly predictible rate&quot; </code></pre> However, the Fed increased M1 money supply by ~20% just in the 2 months following that blog post and by ~70% in the total of 2020 - an increase unprecedented in the history of the US dollar. 2 of the 3 dollars in your pocket have been created out of thin air in 2020.<p>Believing that inflation rates in the next years won&#x27;t spike as a result requires an amount of trust even more artificially inflated than the USD today.<p>[0]: Daily %-change of TSLA,BTC,NFLX,AAPL,AMZN: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;mE7bSI4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;mE7bSI4</a> (TSLA is green)
评论 #25634183 未加载
评论 #25634877 未加载
评论 #25633904 未加载
评论 #25634703 未加载
评论 #25633982 未加载
评论 #25633884 未加载
评论 #25637090 未加载
评论 #25634679 未加载
评论 #25634592 未加载
评论 #25634265 未加载
评论 #25637384 未加载
评论 #25636370 未加载
评论 #25635990 未加载
评论 #25634135 未加载
评论 #25637082 未加载
评论 #25635561 未加载
评论 #25634437 未加载
评论 #25634864 未加载
评论 #25640248 未加载
评论 #25636884 未加载
评论 #25635862 未加载
评论 #25636496 未加载
评论 #25636211 未加载
评论 #25634124 未加载
评论 #25636907 未加载
评论 #25634972 未加载
评论 #25636775 未加载
评论 #25635570 未加载
评论 #25635597 未加载
评论 #25634139 未加载
评论 #25636919 未加载
评论 #25636816 未加载
评论 #25633854 未加载
DethNinjaover 4 years ago
What is with all those articles on HN front page about bitcoin?<p>Is this because BTC price has risen sharply recently?<p>You don’t have to be genius to understand what is going on: USA printed trillions and gave most of it to already rich people. What are they supposed to do with that money? Only option is buying more real estate, buying stock of their companies, or investing in BTC.<p>Keep in mind that these trillions hasn’t flow into these assets yet but it will keep flowing and you will see these asset prices increasing.<p>In essence, if you don’t own any real estate, company stock or BTC then you will essentially own nothing because thieves already sucked all the fiat to its own end.
评论 #25633754 未加载
评论 #25635443 未加载
评论 #25633818 未加载
评论 #25634854 未加载
评论 #25635565 未加载
评论 #25637037 未加载
评论 #25634309 未加载
评论 #25633780 未加载
snowwolfover 4 years ago
&quot;As of December 21, 2020, the Company holds an aggregate of approximately 70,470 bitcoins, which were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.125 billion&quot;<p>Current value January 4, 2021 - $2,238 billion<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.microstrategy.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;company&#x2F;company-videos&#x2F;microstrategy-announces-over-1b-in-total-bitcoin-purchases-in-2020" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.microstrategy.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;company&#x2F;company-videos&#x2F;micr...</a>
评论 #25633653 未加载
评论 #25633866 未加载
评论 #25636863 未加载
评论 #25633229 未加载
washedupover 4 years ago
I don&#x27;t understand why people keep trying to compare Bitcoin to traditional fiat money when it is an entirely new asset class that we have never seen. It is sorta like money (or can easily be converted to &quot;real&quot; money), an asset, store of value, protocol, and secure network all at once. Trying to simplify it into a narrower definition of currency is like trying to fit a tesseract shaped object through a sphere shaped hole.
评论 #25633303 未加载
评论 #25633750 未加载
评论 #25634077 未加载
评论 #25633291 未加载
评论 #25633556 未加载
评论 #25633579 未加载
评论 #25635666 未加载
评论 #25635792 未加载
评论 #25635785 未加载
评论 #25638179 未加载
globileover 4 years ago
HN hug-o-death: Cached version: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;webcache.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;search?q=cache:JPTbrrAfCX0J:https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.singlelunch.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;10&#x2F;21&#x2F;badeconomics-putting-400m-of-bitcoin-on-your-company-balance-sheet&#x2F;+&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=es" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;webcache.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;search?q=cache:JPTbrr...</a>
gruezover 4 years ago
I skimmed this and everything presented in this article has basically been argued to death already. eg.<p>* bitcoin is volatile<p>* bitcoin is deflationary<p>* bitcoin doesn&#x27;t have intrinsic value<p>* blockchains are inefficient compared to centralized ledgers
评论 #25633697 未加载
评论 #25635491 未加载
评论 #25633725 未加载
ElKristover 4 years ago
When comparing BTC to GOLD<p>&gt; First, gold is hard to fake and impossible to manufacture.<p>&gt; Second, gold (...) doesn’t rust or tarnish.<p>&gt; Last, gold is pretty<p>to conclude<p>&gt; On the other hand, BTC lacks all these attributes.<p>I pretty much reach the opposite conclusion with the same premises
评论 #25637185 未加载
评论 #25639847 未加载
评论 #25633907 未加载
评论 #25634013 未加载
jpsalmover 4 years ago
Can someone explain this to me?<p>The year is 2150 or whatever -- bitcoin is fully mined. There is a metric asston of mining hardware out there that needs to be running to secure the chain -- presumably all coming from transaction fees.<p>Not only to transaction fees have to scale to cover the entirety of block rewards but they must continue to grow over time to compete with increased hardware efficiency in hashing.<p>Does it not follow that:<p>a) transaction fees rise to recoup not only current cost of mining hardware, but R&amp;D and deployment of new hardware over time to keep the chain secure. As people realize this they convert their bitcoin to something else to avoid bag holding.<p>OR<p>b) transaction fees cannot support the mining hardware as is, miners sell of their hardware to recoup their costs and the chain becomes vulnerable.<p>I confess I might be missing something but I don&#x27;t see how a fully mined coin is stable.
评论 #25637261 未加载
评论 #25639457 未加载
评论 #25646038 未加载
anm89over 4 years ago
Surely there is no tinge of jealousy on missing out on an asset class that has 10xd this year because &quot;it has no value&quot;.<p>So many people are quick to call this out as a bubble as if it&#x27;s a predetermined outcome, because, have you ever heard of tulip mania and this one time tech stocks, blah blah blah. Call it a bubble after it crashes, not before.<p>Well, Saylor just made a billion dollars on his convictions (seems like a bad economic outcome to me). The future could prove the bears right but so far the present says they&#x27;re dead wrong.<p>One of the funniest things to me is that very few mainstream economists could articulate the value proposition and missed out on the absurd gains of the last 10 years although assessing the value of something like this is exactly what they claim their advanced degrees should give them an advantage in doing. If they truly had a deeper understanding they wouldn&#x27;t be writing angry rants because the missed the train.<p>The awesome thing about markets is that they separate the talkers from the doers, so go write another editorial if it makes you feel better. A bunch of kids in their 20&#x27;s have made more money than this author will make in his whole life because they called it better than this &quot;expert&quot;
评论 #25638644 未加载
briefcommentover 4 years ago
Laundry lists of reasons have begun to have the opposite effect on me than what their authors were probably intending.<p>Idk how to explain it. Scott Adams puts it this way - you would probably use the very best reason if you felt strongly about it, rather than a laundry list.
评论 #25633240 未加载
ur-whaleover 4 years ago
After a quick read, I see no evidence of the author having shorted the microstrategy stock.<p>Given the accumulated evidence in the article, this seems like a no-brainer play.<p>I don&#x27;t understand.<p>Unless the whole article is hot air, of course.
评论 #25633084 未加载
评论 #25633244 未加载
mocmocover 4 years ago
I don’t know what to say. Or the person behind this is 150 years old and was living under a stone, or is someone that obviously has 0 knowledge about Blockchain
评论 #25633068 未加载
评论 #25633126 未加载
inv13over 4 years ago
I am not expert in economics, but form what I see: - Not being able to print money might sound really good first, but this could be the reason COVID haven&#x27;t done the havoc it would have without that money. Stopping businesses from collapse is crucial, no mater at what cost. Why? You really want your local super market to be totally empty? And scavenge for food? No. We just need a way to be able to prevent it. This is what helped in 2008, and currently trying to help. What this money printing is going to cause, we don&#x27;t know, but its better than dieing because of not having the ability to intervene when we have to. - We always need some way of policing this society as a whole. We cant really have nice things. There is a reason we have locks, and fences. Wouldn&#x27;t it be good if we were are just one happy family(I just laughed myself to death saying this)? No crimes, no anything. Everybody just live a happy life without any crime. That would be wonderful. But we all know that is not really what is happening. I feel like that&#x27;s the fairy tale crypto currency is selling, and that&#x27;s why it sells really good, as always, we always thrive some easy way to make a living, make money, whatever. And crypto currency checks a lot of boxes we are all want.
评论 #25634273 未加载
评论 #25633815 未加载
评论 #25636054 未加载
shadowofneptuneover 4 years ago
As someone who has never been particularly interested in cryptocurrency: what happened?<p>I remember it being a novelty in news articles around 2012, something you could use in very select cases to buy things. Idea of an online currency was interesting, but not something I spent too much time thinking about. PayPal already served much the same purpose.<p>Flash forwards to 2017 and the popularity of bitcoin is to the point where it&#x27;s affecting supplies of computer hardware. Yet, it&#x27;s not being treated as a currency at all, instead it&#x27;s an investment. Again, what happened? I don&#x27;t understand why it shifted like this, and I haven&#x27;t found any particularly convincing explanations.
评论 #25637028 未加载
capnorangeover 4 years ago
This argues that BTC is not money based on the big 3 properties, without considering that BTC has been running only for 11 years.<p>BTC&#x2F;Gold is probably the best way to store wealth across time on a 10+ year time horizon without losing much &quot;energy&quot;.<p>Historically fiat currency has been an anomaly, we don&#x27;t know yet how long it will last. Only time will tell if this is the best form of money. Either way, it&#x27;s always good we have alternatives.
评论 #25633347 未加载
评论 #25633159 未加载
评论 #25633224 未加载
评论 #25633109 未加载
评论 #25633831 未加载
评论 #25633246 未加载
throwaway41597over 4 years ago
Things I wished someone had told me about Bitcoin years ago (disclaimers, I own some and I haven&#x27;t read the article but most comments are tangential anyway):<p>- Your takeaway from the comments may be that Bitcoin is still controversial but what if Paul Graham, Sam Altam, Naval Ravikant, Chamath, Peter Thiel, Nassim Taleb, etc all joined the chat to tell you it&#x27;s a good asymmetric bet. It&#x27;s an appeal to authority, sure, but sometimes, you need the right person to tell you the truth. It was at the price they bought and it very well may be today.<p>- The current narrative is it&#x27;s digital gold (but easier to transfer, verify, hide, no inflation, etc). It&#x27;s very easy to fall for arguments that it&#x27;s useless because it&#x27;s hard to transact, too public, that it&#x27;s going to get replaced by something better, but as of today, there is product-market fit, regardless of whether it only works for the rich.<p>- This fall saw a lot of financial adoption, Druckenmiller, Guggenheim, Mass Mutual, off the top of my head. In May, it was Paul Tudor Jones. Everytime these people come, they bring hundreds of millions. These sometimes start with financial disclosures that prevent them from buying before announcing it. Microstrategy publicly asked the bond market $400M to buy BTC, got $650M within a week when price was $18k but got to buy at $23k IIRC. This frontrunning is a recipe to pump the price.<p>- There are 19M BTC in circulation, the next 2M are already somewhat owned by mining companies and their investors, past buyers were either flushed out by past crashes or are battle-hardened and convinced it can go a lot higher.<p>What I&#x27;m trying to say is that Bitcoin could go to $100k with today&#x27;s fundamentals alone. I missed out much of it because of endless ideological, semantic and technological debates, but financially, it&#x27;s makes complete sense and honestly I&#x27;m also in it for the money.<p>This is not financial advice but I feel compeled to end with a few disclaimers: Bitcoin is here to fight inflation, but if deflation occurs, it could hurt; Tether may collapse (this is a shady company selling blockchain dollars which may or may not hold billions of dollars worth of BTC on one side and $20B of liabilities on the other side); investing too much may cloud one&#x27;s judgement, the market is out to get your money.
评论 #25641687 未加载
roywigginsover 4 years ago
&gt; Before money we had to barter, which led to the double coincidence of wants problem<p>this is contested:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;barter-society-myth&#x2F;471051&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;barter-...</a>
评论 #25634943 未加载
coinwardover 4 years ago
I&#x27;ve adopted Bitcoin as my preferred money and use it for savings. I noticed that usd and all other currencies are very volatile, but 1btc is always equal to 1btc. For me, Bitcoin is the least volatile option.
评论 #25635031 未加载
baobabKoodaaover 4 years ago
This website is currently returning 500, so I&#x27;m unable to read the article. This is because it is configured as a server-side rendered website, as opposed to a static website which can be delivered by a CDN. I wish people would stop doing this. The core functionality of a web page (including &quot;blog post&quot; type content) should be entirely static assets delivered by a CDN. Auxiliary functionality can be delivered by a server, an the webpage should gracefully degrade when the server breaks down.
moscoviumover 4 years ago
&quot;Before money we had to barter, which led to the double coincidence of wants problem. When everyone accepts the same money you can buy something from someone even if they don’t like the stuff you own.&quot;<p>Stopped reading right here. Anthropologists have widely discredited any ideas that &quot;before money we had barter&quot;, but it&#x27;s just shyly asserted as absolute fact.<p>If you&#x27;re going to argue something isn&#x27;t money, you should first have a correct idea of what is money.
评论 #25633806 未加载
sodafountanover 4 years ago
I think we&#x27;re actually on the cusp of some sort of hyperinflation&#x2F;stagflation this decade, so BTC is a fantastic hedge against that.<p>You can&#x27;t float the entire US economy along, shutter all of the businesses but keep people employed on government loans without ramifications. We should be in a terrible recession right now, but of course the government stepped in to prevent that from happening (mostly).<p>A functioning economy has a healthy level of financial inputs and outputs: you go to work, you spend X amount of your dollars on entertainment, food, home improvement etc. and you save Y amount.<p>The problem is when you shutter all of the businesses that just creates a massive surplus of money. That doesn&#x27;t even get into things like stimulus checks, PPP loans, etc. People don&#x27;t necessarily need more cash, people really need to produce more and start spending money again.<p>Too much economic input without enough output.<p>Needless to say the MicroStrategy investment was really smart and the author doesn&#x27;t know what he&#x27;s talking about. 51% attack? Really? So an individual actor is going to spin up computational power eclipsing the country of Switzerland just to take down bitcoin?
Zamicolover 4 years ago
I&#x27;m not the biggest Bitcoin fan, but this article is dumb.<p>I&#x27;m not a Bitcoin &quot;believer&quot; in that I don&#x27;t believe the modern Bitcoiner&#x27;s dogma. But many newcomers don&#x27;t know the history: a significant number of early Bitcoin engineers have moved on to other projects (like Ethereum) that better align with some of Bitcoin&#x27;s early goals, such as a cash alternative and an accessible economic cypherpunk system.<p>There are many cryptocurrency projects that are less dogmatic and more pragmatic.<p>&gt;&quot;Is Bitcoin money? No.&quot;<p>While I appreciate the upfrontness, the problem with this mentality is failing to conceive how the technology itself can easily overcome these minor criticism.<p>&gt;&quot;1. Medium of Exchange.&quot;<p>Even if Bitcoin isn&#x27;t, which you&#x27;d need a very narrow definition, Eth easily overcomes this argument. Eth has functional, successful, trustless, and distributed stable assets that serve as stable priced mediums of exchange. I don&#x27;t see how other cryptocurrencies aren&#x27;t money even if Bitcoin isn&#x27;t, which also undermines the intent of the article.<p>&gt;&quot;2. Unit of Account. ... We denominate BTC in terms of how many USD they’re worth, so BTC is not a unit of account presently.&quot;<p>That is severely ignorant and makes it obvious that the author has spent superficial time in the space. I cannot think of a charting tool that doesn&#x27;t allow denomination in at least one other cryptocurrency. The Eth community refers to &quot;the ratio&quot; (denomination in Bitcoin or other assets) constantly.<p>&gt; 3. Store of Value.<p>See point 1. This is a solved problem.
seibeljover 4 years ago
Bitcoin is <i>voluntary</i>! Investing in MicroStrategy is <i>voluntary</i>! There is absolute no coercion to buy bitcoin or invest in MicroStrategy.<p>If you are so certain that bitcoin is toxic, short it on one of the many platforms that allow this, or if you don&#x27;t have the guts, just ignore it. No one makes you use it. That bitcoin continues to grow and gain value relative to fiat currencies is an organic decision by market participants.
H8crilAover 4 years ago
The title is inverted, it should say &quot;Putting $400M of your company [balance sheet] into Bitcoin&quot;. And it&#x27;s no different than any other corporate management decision: makes sense if your company is supposed to do such things. Almost all companies aren&#x27;t supposed to trade cryptocurrency.
crypticaover 4 years ago
&gt;&gt; Having control over supply of your currency is a good thing, as long as it’s well run.<p>Depends whose control we&#x27;re referring to. The people who control the currency control the dynamics of the economy and society. That&#x27;s all good if the dynamics work in your favor (e.g. your friends are central bankers and billionaires) but otherwise it&#x27;s terrible.<p>Also, what does it mean &quot;well run&quot;? Well run from whose perspective? Monetary policy does not create economic value; it can only help those in charge to decide who are the winners and who are the losers.<p>My personal values don&#x27;t align at all with the current monetary system. It doesn&#x27;t work for me. It works against me. I&#x27;d rather accept a currency which cannot be controlled by anyone than one which is controlled by my enemies.
Ecstatifyover 4 years ago
I think bitcoin is the new politics, we won’t be able to talk about it in work soon. It’s ok to disagree with someone, but to just attack the author is ridiculous.<p>examples:<p>“I work in this space and can confirm this guy is talking out his ass and has no idea what he&#x27;s talking about”<p>“Yeah, this author has no idea what he&#x27;s talking about and it&#x27;s stuck in a cognitive dissonance bubble”<p>“I don’t know what to say. Or the person behind this is 150 years old and was living under a stone, or is someone that obviously has 0 knowledge about Blockchain”<p>“maybe try to properly host an html page before advising multi billion businesses...”<p>“I feel like these analyses are always very well researched and set-out, but the authors lack any formal qualifications at all. Why read this when there are Nobel prize winners with polemics on Bitcoin?”
Jimmc414over 4 years ago
&quot;A single transaction takes as much electricity as 800,000 VISA transactions, or watching 50,000 hours of youtube videos.&quot; Respectfully, I&#x27;d like to call BS on those points. I&#x27;m surprised to find these assertions in a post this highly ranked on HN.
评论 #25639358 未加载
评论 #25635365 未加载
acecover 4 years ago
- Fixed supply is not a &quot;problem built-in&quot;, it a a feature - Yes, it can be used as a medium of exchange using the lightning network - The blockckain is inefficient but it was not built for efficiency but to solve the trust problem in a trust-less network.<p>and so on...
yamrzouover 4 years ago
&gt; On the other hand, BTC lacks all these attributes. Its value is largely based on common perception of value.<p>The same can be said for gold. Why would being pretty, durable and impossible to manufacture justify an intrinsic value?
freebujuover 4 years ago
The author may be right in that MSTR putting the surplus capital towards BTC was a somewhat strange and potentially reckless move.<p>He got a lot of things wrong with what Bitcoin is and how it works. For instance he claims Bitcoin to be anonymous and a criminals&#x27; haven when all BTC transactions are publicly and permanently recorded on the blockchain. While also criticising it&#x27;s inefficiencies he offers no other alternatives nor any solutions for them.<p>Unrelated though; There is no fighting against Bitcoin as the future of digital currency. The fast dinosaurs like PayPal have already started seeing the mass extinction ahead.
评论 #25636433 未加载
tseingover 4 years ago
I often encounter arguments that conflate the volatile price of Bitcoin with its utility. Price is a meeting of supply and demand, and we&#x27;re discussing an asset that is roughly only a decade old. Of course the price is volatile, but that does not reflect anything <i>intrinsic</i> about the utility of Bitcoin itself. If gold never existed, and just suddenly starting raining from the sky occasionally, we would also have trouble meeting minds on the effective price of this sky rock.
atemerevover 4 years ago
Bitcoin is money, of course. I can buy a pizza or whatever for bitcoins (it will be rather inefficient though, so there is a great way of doing this indirectly -- Bitcoin-backed credit cards). In my country, I can pay taxes with cryptocurrencies (on municipal and cantonal levels). It is volatile, of course, but there were (and are) quite a lot of currencies no less volatile, and nobody have argued that these are not money.<p>This article is like those from 2017, all over again.
MichaelBurgeover 4 years ago
Don&#x27;t futures completely solve the &quot;Bitcoin price is volatile&quot; problem for large actors?<p>Short Bitcoin futures to lock in your current rate; or buy some puts &amp; sell calls to constrain it to a range without spending anything extra.<p>And your counterparty is CME rather than some fly-by-night cryptocurrency exchange.<p>Doesn&#x27;t help with buying a pizza(a single futures contract is 5 bitcoin, or $150k at current rate), but that seems solvable.
null0pointerover 4 years ago
Are the supply and demand curves supposed to be reversed?
评论 #25636129 未加载
enahs-sfover 4 years ago
&gt; Some form of 51% attack succeeds<p>Given the current state of the market, this seems implausible to succeed.<p>Total BTC in circulation: 18.6m Current BTC price: $31,697 51% of 18.6m: 9,486,000<p>to outright buy that would cost ~$300bn.<p>not accounting for lost coins, the fact that such a supply is inherently distributed throughout the market and such an attempt would almost certainly move the price much higher.<p>Zuckerberg and Bezos should pool their cash and take a stab at it, though.
评论 #25637713 未加载
zander312over 4 years ago
maybe try to properly host an html page before advising multi billion businesses...
latchkeyover 4 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;fintechfrank&#x2F;status&#x2F;1346102729140297730?s=21" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;fintechfrank&#x2F;status&#x2F;1346102729140297730?...</a><p>Three Arrows Capital position in GBTC tops $1 billion. As per a filing with the SEC, the firm&#x27;s holdings represent 36,969 bitcoin.<p>1,240,000,000&#x2F;36,969 = average price is $33,541.<p>The fomo is real.
EVa5I7bHFq9mnYKover 4 years ago
Bitcoin is first and foremost about power and control. You can receive and spend it without anyone&#x27;s permission and even without anyone knowing that you have it. It&#x27;s value increases as those in power are trying to impose greater and greater controls over our lives.
hykoover 4 years ago
I think the article misses the point completely: this is bad practice because the company has no business buying up random assets using other people’s money. That would be equally true if they bought $400M of fine wine, real estate, or gratitude crystals.
meehowover 4 years ago
IPFS copy in case of error 500: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ipfs.2read.net&#x2F;ipfs&#x2F;QmVYyc1zi8FtAAd63uCrxrunUgzvZztdGkuiUW5vsNzYXG&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ipfs.2read.net&#x2F;ipfs&#x2F;QmVYyc1zi8FtAAd63uCrxrunUgzvZztd...</a>
ekianjoover 4 years ago
&gt; Even if you erased humanity and started over, the new humans would still find gold to be economically valuable<p>Ridiculous point to make. Gold is valuable for some applications, but in no way is its current value related to its utility in industry and all.
luka-birsaover 4 years ago
I KNOW Bitcoin is really bad&#x2F;evil&#x2F;ponzi&#x2F;fake, but can&#x27;t you guys just leave the people to do mistakes on their own?<p>&#x2F;sarcasm off<p>Funny how people tend to disregard this comment and keep doing just fine. For over a decade.
joshuaenglerover 4 years ago
This was actually an incredibly incompetent post that misunderstands WHAT Bitcoin actually is, while at the same time spewing word salad to make it sound like a well-researched opinion.
EVa5I7bHFq9mnYKover 4 years ago
And the most awful thing is that they now have $900M of Bitcoins on their company balance sheet. Bitcoin does that: you invest 5% of your portfolio and boom its now 80%. Real creepy.
aqme28over 4 years ago
Would anyone have written this article if it was $400M of TSLA? The company made a risky investment with its spare capital. That&#x27;s not a crazy thing for a company to do.
Devastaover 4 years ago
Honestly, when you look at the massive energy consumption compared to the tiny transaction volume, Bitcoin should be banned.<p>Whatever about other cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin is climate arson.
评论 #25634260 未加载
bearbinover 4 years ago
Site appears down, there is an archived version available: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;yT3Pp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;yT3Pp</a>
x87678rover 4 years ago
It has been a very good strategy so far. Stock is up 3x in a few months. Hopefully MicroStrategy can spin off the software part of the business and just buy bitcoin.
janandonlyover 4 years ago
I am curious why all articles that are positive about Bitcoin are shunned from HN but negative articles “somehow” make it to #1.<p>Manipulation much?
knodiover 4 years ago
I&#x27;m not about to trade off a bank for ledge indexing service. BTC is the digital Tulip craze.
duxupover 4 years ago
I&#x27;m seeing &#x27;500 Internal Server Error&#x27; at the moment from that URL.
Triv888over 4 years ago
LoL, the first page of comments on this post only show one top-level comment...
redhot2323over 4 years ago
Lets say you are right and was bad ec0n0mics...<p>Your shorting vested interest wins?<p>Not today...
artursapekover 4 years ago
Sounds like someone missed the bull run, aaahahaha
richardARPANETover 4 years ago
Author is mad he didn&#x27;t buy Bitcoin sooner.
abigger87over 4 years ago
“internal server error” yup about correct
greenhackerover 4 years ago
Have fun staying poor
reedf1over 4 years ago
I feel like these analyses are always very well researched and set-out, but the authors lack any formal qualifications at all. Why read this when there are Nobel prize winners with polemics on Bitcoin? It ends up reading like man-waves-fist-at-cloud on how economics aught to be, rather than how it is.
评论 #25633121 未加载
评论 #25633072 未加载
评论 #25633059 未加载
locengover 4 years ago
Is any of these large amounts of money someone&#x27;s individual money they&#x27;ve earned that they&#x27;re putting into these schemes, or is it part of financial complex&#x2F;capture - where decision making has trickled up to a small few - so few people to manipulate&#x2F;convince into such decisions?<p>&quot;Bitcoin is almost as bs as fiat money&quot; - Elon Musk; I haven&#x27;t seen any pro-Bitcoiner try to spin this quote as a positive yet, though I&#x27;m sure I&#x27;ll laugh at whatever mental gymnastics are presented. Good luck betting against Elon&#x27;s understanding of the holistic, exponentials.
christiansakaiover 4 years ago
Satoshi Nakamoto (whoever he&#x2F;she&#x2F;they) would not believe what he&#x2F;she&#x2F;they see today:<p>- Bitcoin is not used for transaction, due to it is not scalable - But used for store of value, which plenty of people find reason 1 is not a bug but a feature<p>Suddenly Covid19 hits. People go crazy over masks, lockdown, trust in government at all time low. Government attempt to fix the damage done by pumping more money. Economy destroyed, money printer go brrr makes all asset class bubbles. Institutions are out of asset class to invest and &quot;hey we got too much money, where should we throw this? look there is this thing called Bitcoin we forgot about it, let&#x27;s just gamble it away, 5% of our portfolio, if we lose it we lose it, but if we made it we gonna go to the moon&quot;<p>Institutions then joining in, prompting more retail skeptics to reason &quot;if institutions join then this gonna go to Jupiter, and at best land on the moon, I&#x27;ll join up, I need to pay my mortgage&#x2F;student debt, or get out of whatever screwed economic situation that happens in this 2020 pandemic just like most millennials out there, I have no other choice, go big or go home&quot;.<p>Welcome to the (USA only) Circus. Soon there will be Bitcoin Mining Employment Act because all of us will only mine Bitcoin, no other economic activity matters.