TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

I am closing down the Cordless project

80 pointsby sim_card_mapover 4 years ago

13 comments

lights0123over 4 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=25184751" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=25184751</a>
ev1over 4 years ago
This has been well known for a while; they block all third party clients and libraries outside of using their official bot API.<p>Having been on the receiving end of over 50k compromised accounts attacking my server (with verified phone enabled); largely stolen oauth&#x2F;access tokens from real users, I can also see why they would do that as a platform owner.<p>On the other hand, as a rms-thoughtpattern, this is awful.
评论 #25684989 未加载
评论 #25685218 未加载
mxschoover 4 years ago
Discords around financial or economic topics (e.g. cryptocurrencies, Steam trading) are heavily abused by scammers that use large numbers of bots to attack or phish users. I could see an argument where Discord wants to keep control over how they are fighting such abuse, and banning all non-granted API access could be one part of that.
rvzover 4 years ago
This isn&#x27;t really surprising since Discord owns the whole API and it was only a matter of time this would happen which is why I have little hope for third-party clients for GitHub, Twitter, Reddit, YouTube etc, since they have official clients for them. [0]<p>Either the API gets blocked for third-party clients, or you purchase a high price for it.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22609319" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22609319</a>
neulandover 4 years ago
This project seemed innocuous enough. And it&#x27;s a shame Discord killed it. As long as services are centralized, platform owners keep doing things like this.
samdixonover 4 years ago
I wonder how long until Discord starts blocking things like Matrix or IRC Bridges. That or the Bot API may already be useful enough to say something &quot;works&quot;, but is so functionally useless that you have no reason to use it. (e.g. you can bridge to a channel, but not bridge instant messages)
dborehamover 4 years ago
AOL Instant Messenger wars returned.
tomaszsover 4 years ago
Isn&#x27;t Didcord on-premise? How could he be banned? Hopefully someone will be able to answer. Please don&#x27;t downvote only because you think the question is stupid.
评论 #25685695 未加载
ColinWrightover 4 years ago
Can someone please do an ELI5 for this? I have no idea what it is, what it relates to, or why it&#x27;s important, other than:<p>* It&#x27;s about &#x27;bots, and<p>* It relates to Discord.<p>Thanks.
评论 #25685586 未加载
passerby1over 4 years ago
Reminds of a similar ICQ policy.how does discord enforce this? Do they use a similar tactics like a frequent protocol changes?
评论 #25685189 未加载
bzb6over 4 years ago
As their terms of use have said since day 1. What’s the news?
评论 #25685356 未加载
pearjuiceover 4 years ago
Discord bans users for not adhering to the terms of service is a better title.
ddevaultover 4 years ago
This kind of behavior should be illegal. Remind me again why anyone here is using proprietary chat software? Just use IRC, or if you simply must use something else, use Matrix.
评论 #25685523 未加载
评论 #25685390 未加载
评论 #25685332 未加载
评论 #25685501 未加载
评论 #25685345 未加载
评论 #25685357 未加载