TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Signal increased limits for group calls

130 pointsby eddieozover 4 years ago

11 comments

undefined1over 4 years ago
Serious question to those cheering on the deplatforming power of the big tech monopolies:<p>Are you still going to be onboard when Signal is banned from the App stores? How about when backdoors are required?<p>Bear in mind, Signal has <i>no</i> moderation - that&#x27;s baked into the product.
评论 #25752099 未加载
评论 #25747536 未加载
评论 #25752324 未加载
评论 #25749539 未加载
kjakmover 4 years ago
It&#x27;s really interesting to see the things people want:<p>1. Stickers<p>2. Status<p>3. Stories<p>4. Chat wallpapers<p>5. etc.<p>I guess it shows the different ways people use chat apps but I don&#x27;t see any use case for status or understand why people want stories in yet another app. I&#x27;m sure they have their reasons though. Quite an interesting thread of requests.
评论 #25747735 未加载
评论 #25753697 未加载
评论 #25753275 未加载
评论 #25747501 未加载
评论 #25747630 未加载
评论 #25749318 未加载
评论 #25747829 未加载
bilal4hmedover 4 years ago
Figure out how people will continue to donate and not deviate from their original mission, given the push from new users for feature parity with Telegram and WhatsApp.<p>I cant imagine that $100mn lasting if people are doing group calls, file transfers etc. because those are expensive activities with the needs for servers, bandwidth.<p>Previously they had the luxury to coast because of that donation, now not so much.
评论 #25747416 未加载
评论 #25747378 未加载
tribaalover 4 years ago
I think Signal should bundle a simple on-screen keyboard, similar to the way banks etc... do it.<p>It always felt weird to me that while I trust Signal developers, all of the text input into the app goes through an on-screen keyboard that might or might not be secure.<p>So basically, on android, while your data doesn&#x27;t go to Facebook anymore, as far as I can tell it still goes to Google via the keyboard app. Doesn&#x27;t it?<p>EDIT: It feels to me like a missing piece, but maybe I&#x27;m wrong. Please educate me if I am, it&#x27;s a genuine question :)
评论 #25752191 未加载
评论 #25747468 未加载
评论 #25747457 未加载
评论 #25747515 未加载
评论 #25759178 未加载
评论 #25747559 未加载
评论 #25747419 未加载
bravoetchover 4 years ago
Remove the requirement for a phone number. I prefer apps that are first class citizens on other non-phone devices.
评论 #25757437 未加载
评论 #25752178 未加载
m-p-3over 4 years ago
For me, I don&#x27;t plan on fully switching to Signal unless there&#x27;s the ability to create an identity that isn&#x27;t tied to a phone number.
评论 #25752698 未加载
评论 #25752352 未加载
kitkat_newover 4 years ago
Interoperability&#x2F;Federation, please<p>A walled garden has no long term future
评论 #25753189 未加载
评论 #25747327 未加载
评论 #25747316 未加载
评论 #25747293 未加载
chanmad29over 4 years ago
Is there chat syncing across devices and backups on cards or does it defeat the app&#x27;s purpose?
评论 #25747182 未加载
评论 #25747427 未加载
nixpulvisover 4 years ago
1. Removal of phone number requirement<p>2. Feature parity for desktop app<p>3. Improved search and archival features<p>4. Full message threading?
newscrackerover 4 years ago
Flagging this for an editorialized title, which is against the HN Guidelines for posts like this where a change in title is not required.<p>The tweet says that Signal group calling limit has been raised from 5 to 8 and it continues to say (pun intended) that now you can call it even. I think it’s good to have a limit of 8 as opposed to 5, but it’d be better to bump this to double it further to cover almost everyone’s needs, though that’d require a lot more effort.<p>But Signal, as observed over the years, could do better by focusing on many other features that users and potential switchers consider critical.
eddieozover 4 years ago
Do they really need to be like whatsapp for massive adoption?
评论 #25747161 未加载
评论 #25747269 未加载