Yes, a systemic breakdown has occurred. The very language used in patents is latin-like. Back in the days of Rome, the written language was deliberately built to enable the business of scribes, and was full of tenses, declensions etc. Write a letter = hire a scribe. Read a letter = the same. Unles you were educated. Hard to start a recolution, spread the word etc. This did not fade away until the 19th century in many languages.
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_grammar" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_grammar</a>
As some old Latin student at Eton wrote:-
Latin's a dead language,
lying in the dust,
first it killed the Romans,
now it's killing us.<p>In a similar way patent speak has become a language for an elite. This has made it very hard to hire capable examiners at the wages they offer. An examiner needs to be capable in both patent-speak and whatever technology is in the patent application.
Most people capable in tech disciplines can get far better work elsewhere.
So they need to reform the patent-speak into the common language of whatever country - making sure that correct terms are used. This would expand the examiner pool enormously.
Your link is broken my digi-friend?<p>Think you meant: <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/06/stupid-patent-month-storage-cabinets-computer" rel="nofollow">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/06/stupid-patent-month-st...</a>