Interesting. I still prefer the clarity of the map of mathematical structures I ran across in the late 90s from Max Tegmark... Perhaps it might interest some of you who are reading this discussion: <a href="https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe.gif" rel="nofollow">https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/toe.gif</a><p>(parent webpage if you want more context: <a href="https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/crazy.html" rel="nofollow">https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/crazy.html</a>).
Semi-literate nonsense - I think it only shows the "little knowledge" of the mapmaker.<p>What about dynamical systems? Theoretical computer science? Mathematical Logic? If you want to have a look at the classification used by the American Mathematical Society, here is what their "map" looks like (151 pages):<p><a href="https://mathscinet.ams.org/msnhtml/msc2020.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://mathscinet.ams.org/msnhtml/msc2020.pdf</a>
I'm not usually one to poke fun at these things but my friends who study formal logic/model theory/category theory/homotopy type theory/etc. will be excited to learn that they are not in fact doing mathematics.
I like boring diagrams.<p><pre><code> - Static with zero animations
- Connections are always visible (no need to hover over)
- Logically laid out, not randomly placed and drawing connection lines all over
- SVG or PNG format, I can copy it and save it on disk</code></pre>
I prefer this one: <a href="https://tomcircle.wordpress.com/2017/02/15/map-of-mathematics/" rel="nofollow">https://tomcircle.wordpress.com/2017/02/15/map-of-mathematic...</a>
At this point it looks more like trolling. No mention of the operator theory. No general analysis no general algebra. ZERO math applied to physics (discretisation, stats).
At first I thought this was a random student attempting something. Would have never guesses that this was actually from quanta.<p>Here is the discussion from /r/math: <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/l4zhxh/the_map_of_mathematics" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/l4zhxh/the_map_of_mat...</a>
This is great. It's appeared before in HN, and I'm glad to see it again.<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22328516" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22328516</a>
I like this poster: <a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OmJ-4B-mS-Y&feature=youtu.be" rel="nofollow">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OmJ-4B-mS-Y&feature=youtu.be</a>
That's really cool, but after poking around, I can't find set theory, logic, and graph theory. Am I just missing it? It seems kind of tainted toward physics.
The educational youtube channel Domain of Science has a pretty wide-scope Map of Mathematics, depending on your background <a href="https://youtu.be/OmJ-4B-mS-Y" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/OmJ-4B-mS-Y</a>