TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Shelling Out -- The Origins of Money

50 pointsby dynosauralmost 14 years ago

6 comments

nonzeroalmost 14 years ago
Evolutionary psychology strikes me as myth-making, not in the pejorative sense but in that it forms an understandable, cohesive, and easily retold story around a bunch of observations. It's ironic that the article labels the rationale primitive societies give for the importance of their media of exchange as "mythologies that served more as proximate motivators of behavior than as theories of ultimate purpose or origin."<p>Couldn't we say the same thing about what people think of money today? From "money is the root of evil" to our various economic theories, we are just telling ourselves stories that, as time passes, become more comprehensive (explains earlier theories and more). If our economic theories are myths, which I believe they are, then how should we mold the narrative to inspire us toward more cooperation and less starvation and violence?
评论 #2599810 未加载
geuisalmost 14 years ago
I'm taking the time to read through the article thoroughly. So far about 50% through.<p>I take issue with some assumptions like our Neolithic ancestors were always on the edge of starvation. Hunter gatherer tribes in many parts of the world in pre-Columbian times and even today got along quite well and in many instances had as much or more free time than we do today.<p>That aside, the general direction of the paper seems to be that some concept of money or "collectibles" has been endemic with our species since very close to the beginning about 100k years ago. The author equates this as a process manifested from underlying genetic survival mechanisms.<p>It's very interested and I recommend others to read it.
评论 #2600948 未加载
nazgulnarsilalmost 14 years ago
fun fact: Szabo is partially responsible for the idea behind bitcoin. <a href="http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/12/bit-gold.html" rel="nofollow">http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/12/bit-gold.html</a>
评论 #2598308 未加载
patrickgzillalmost 14 years ago
There is really a huge amount wrong with this article.<p>For instance, fiat currency has been around for hundreds of years, it is not a 20th-century occurrence.<p>The French used assignats which were similar to our Federal Reserve Notes, the Chinese used small silk sheets the Empereor imprinted his seal onto, etc.<p>Even during the time of Thomas Jefferson there was the Continental currency, which crashed (as did all other fiat enterprises) rather spectacularly:<p>"The annihilation was so complete that barber-shops were papered in jest with the bills; and the sailors, on returning from their cruise, being paid off in bundles of this worthless money, had suits of clothes made of it, and with characteristic light-heartedness turned their loss into a frolic by parading through the streets in decayed finery which in its better days had passed for thousands of dollars."<p>Secondly, he claims that eBay's main purpose is to allow for trade in collectible items. While I am sure there are many sales of Beanie Babies online, he quotes no sources to lend support to that argument. Myself, I have only ever bought computer equipment from eBay...
utungaalmost 14 years ago
It's a really excellent piece.<p>I was very much informed/inspired by this when I made my humble attempt at a 'understanding money from a game theory / social network perspective' video <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQX3tNuC_TY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQX3tNuC_TY</a>
spinchangealmost 14 years ago
I love the "money is a formal token of delayed reciprocal altruism" bit, attributed to Richard Dawkins.