Not sure what they're hoping to achieve, but it will eventually show who actually owns Dominion, something that has been shrouded in mystery once the controversy started.
Can a legal professional weigh in and tell me if the language in points 1 and 2 in the introduction are typical for these kinds of lawsuits? <a href="https://www.smartmatic.com/uploads/Smartmatic_Complaint_Against_Fox_Corporation.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.smartmatic.com/uploads/Smartmatic_Complaint_Agai...</a><p>>> 1. The Earth is round. Two plus two equals four. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won the 2020 election for President and Vice President of the United States. The election was not stolen, rigged, or fixed. These are facts. They are demonstrable and irrefutable.<p>>> 2. Defendants have always known these facts. They knew Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won the 2020 U.S. election. They knew the election was not stolen. They knew the election was not rigged or fixed. They knew these truths just as they knew the Earth is round and two plus two equals four.<p>Is such snarkiness normal for lawsuit language? Honestly this reads like the begining of a tweet thread and I'm half expecting them to start using the clapping hands emoji instead of spaces.