TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Apple Says Kernel Extensions Won't Be Supported on Future Apple Silicon Macs

41 pointsby dmmalamover 4 years ago

5 comments

jnwatsonover 4 years ago
I&#x27;ve written a MacOS kernel extension. The API is a underdocumented mess. I understand why they would want to remove it, even it is just to eliminate the API burden, but, that means the last resort to add functionality that Apple hasn&#x27;t deemed appropriate is closed off.<p>That&#x27;s truly unfortunate.
cglongover 4 years ago
Want to highlight the most upvoted comment on the article:<p>&gt; At the end, their goal is that MacOS is just iPadOS with Terminal and Xcode.
评论 #26187491 未加载
评论 #26188555 未加载
stmwover 4 years ago
While I understand the argument for removing kernel extensions, I don&#x27;t think I can agree with it. It should be possible to run your own software at the kernel privilege level. There are usecases where that&#x27;s essential, and for the long term it ensures that the whole system does not become overly closed.
评论 #26189426 未加载
Klwohuover 4 years ago
There are operating systems specifically made to allow for tinkering with the internals. Mac OS, and Windows are not among these. Over time, each has allowed the user to control fewer aspects of the system. And there&#x27;s nothing the users can do to stop it. What are they going to do, switch to Linux or BSD? Hah. Anybody who hasn&#x27;t bailed already is stuck forever with their platform of choice, I would say.
评论 #26189484 未加载
cozzydover 4 years ago
So... is Apple going to develop drivers for all possible peripherals?<p>For USB you have libusb I guess (not sure if that covers all us cases), but Thunderbolt is a full-on PCIe bus isn&#x27;t it?
评论 #26188481 未加载